Articles and Interviews by John Robles From Nov. 09, 2012 Feb. 08, 2013
8 February, 22:27
Want to be a US diplomat? Got a million dollars? Call Obama
If it happened in Russia or any other country the U.S. Government and the
western mass media would be screaming corruption, foul, nepotism, cronyism,
bribes, and transparency! What I am talking about is the “selling” of top
diplomatic posts by none other than the U.S. president. Although the U.S.
does not “sell” such postings openly, “wink-wink,” two respected researches
at the University of Pennsylvania have very carefully compiled a “price
list” for diplomatic postings.
In their report titled: “What Price the Court of St. James’s? Political
Influences on Ambassadorial Postings of the United States of America” the
authors of the study, Johannes W. Fedderke and Dennis C. Jett, looked into
the issues surrounding the appointment of career diplomats as opposed to
political appointees to ambassadorial positions worldwide. Their conclusion
is that the price for obtaining the juiciest postings, such as London U.K.
or “The Court of St. James,” in terms of political “campaign” contributions
is between a whopping $650,000 and a staggering $2.3 million.
Other than the facts that selling diplomatic positions is an obvious act of
cronyism and bribery is supposed to be illegal, the main problem here is
that for the over 30% of such diplomatic postings held by current and past
political appointees chosen in this manner, no experience was, nor is,
necessary. That’s right. You don’t have to have had one day of diplomatic
training to be the head of a US mission abroad, as long as you are a
“political” appointee chosen by the president: which might explain a lot
about people who are in such posts worldwide, including here.
The American mass media has reported on the findings of the reports but are
reporting it as if it just another normal occurrence and par-for-the-course
rather than expressing outrage and calling for an investigation. According
to most US mass media, this is pretty much normal and has been done by all
“modern presidents before Obama”, this said the New York Times.
In the report the authors state that they did not have access to all US
Presidential Campaign contributions, but, and this is an important “but,”
they did have access to the campaign contributions of all political
appointees to diplomatic posts. It was on this data that they formed the
basis for their findings. The authors stated that they could not formulate
figures on over all correlations between contributions and postings,
something which is worthy of further research due to this lack of “all”
data.
The authors suggest the US State Department carry out oversight on the
qualifications and training of such appointees, however this is unlikely to
take place. As we also know many of these overseas posts are not only filled
by political appointees but by CIA undercover operatives and the like as
well. Something that career Foreign Service employees must find insulting
and demeaning as well.
According to the authors of the report the most sought after posts are in
Western Europe and in the Caribbean and most of these are filled by
presidential appointees. We could then assume that other postings, in
countries of strategic or military interest, or “hot spots” if you will
(such as Russia), are filled by CIA or other intelligence or military
specialists, leaving those qualified, dedicated, trained and experienced
foreign service personnel, who have worked most of their lives to obtain
high level positions, to bake in places in Sub-Saharan Africa or South Asia
or any other God-forsaken-hell-hole no one else would want to be posted in.
Not to say certain places on Earth are hell holes, every place is wonderful
in its own way, but there are places one might prefer over others.
The authors argue that “standard models of rational institutional design
posit that appointments to public administrative office should be on the
basis of merit related to the deliverables associated with the post,”
something that I am sure the American taxpayer would want as well,
especially in places such as Moscow, where people have been posted who have
had “no” diplomatic experience or training whatsoever. However Russia is not
a location the authors would consider attractive.
The report is very well laid out and the rationale behind the conclusion is
very well thought out, researched and backed up with solid data and
analysis. In conclusion the authors state that “… political appointees are
more likely to obtain posts in high- income countries that are members of
The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), that
popular tourist destinations, are located in Western Europe, and that carry
lower hardship allowances, than are career diplomats. We have also shown
that the greater t he personal or bundled campaign contributions to a
presidential campaign, the more lucrative the posting the contributor can
expect in terms of per capita GDP, tourist volumes, hardship allowances, and
the more likely the posting will be in Western Europe, and the less likely
it will be in Central and South Asia or Sub- Saharan Africa. Finally, we
have established an implicit price list for a range of ambassadorial
postings. The price for the Court of St. James appears to lie between
$650,000 and $2.3 million.”
If this were to be said of any other country in the world the international
outrage would be profound, but in America, hypocrisy is par-for-the-course
and every office, including that of the President is for sale, if the price
is right.
The views and opinions expressed above are my own. I can be reached at
jar2@list.ru.
Read more: http://voiceofrussia.com/2013_02_08/Want-to-be-a-US-diplomat-Got-a-million-dollars-Call-Obama/
7 February, 16:43 How Did They Allow CIA to Become Death Squad? Medea Benjamin
CodePink director and co-founder Medea Benjamin spoke with VoR about the
recently exposed US Justice Department white paper rationalizing and making
legal the execution of Americans. She talks about the illegality of drone
assassinations, recounts her recent trip to Pakistan, where CodePink peace
activists apologized to the Pakistani people, who she says were more than a
little shocked to hear Americans saying "Your lives and your children are
worth as much as ours." CodePink is one of the most active and most publicly
heard peace groups which has been protesting the illegal use of drones and
the assassination machine that the US Executive Branch and the CIA have
become.
Hello! This is John Robles, I’m speaking with Medea Benjamin. She is the
co-founder and director of the peace group Code Pink in the US.
Robles: Hello
Medea! How are you?
Benjamin: I’m
doing fine, thank you very much.
Robles: It’s
a pleasure to be speaking with you again. Thanks for agreeing to speak with
us. You’ve read the white paper authorizing the assassination of US
citizens. The document starts out stating: US citizens who are “senior
operational leaders in Al Qaeda”. How many people like that do you know of
in the world?
Benjamin: I
don’t know any people like that in the world. I do know that of the
thousands of people that have been killed by drones only 2% of them are seen
to be high target people. So, it is very confusing to know what the
Government means when they say “high target people” and who is to determine
that. And especially, since the whole program is secret, I don’t think that
we can rely on our Government to have the right intelligence to know who is
a high target that deserves to be killed without any kind of possibility of
being captured or having a chance to a trial.
Robles: Right!
The language at the beginning says the high level operational leaders or
senior leaders of Al Qaeda who are US citizens. I think that’s a way to get
this in the door and then they can expand it to include anyone they want.
Would you agree with that?
Benjamin: That’s
the view of this, that if we allow this kind of legal underpinning that is
so open-ended and we allow Government officials to define it in secret, then
we are opening a door to anybody being labeled that.
Robles: “To
be an informed high level official”: Who makes that determination? Who would
that be?
Benjamin: Well,
certainly we know now that on “Terror Tuesdays” President Obama meets with
his counterterrorism chief John Brennan and other members of the national
security team and make these kinds of decisions, and they’ve been doing this
for years already. And so, really, we are leaving this either to a president
or to people that have not been elected by the American public.
And certainly, even the people in Congress who are supposed to have
knowledge of this, people who are on the Intelligence Committee and supposed
to be doing the oversight, certainly have not had access to this
information. So, it is an unprecedented power grab by the Executive Branch.
Robles: I
would say a high level official would be, maybe, anyone from the Attorney
General to the Secretary of State. Would you agree with that?
Benjamin: It
could even be lower than that, I mean it could be a Deputy Cabinet Minister.
Who knows? It is not defined.
Robles: So,
basically this white paper gives anyone with that classification the right
to order the assassination of anyone. Well, as long as they are a, quote: “a
senior operational Al Qaeda or associate” or something. They can classify
anyone as being associated, even if it is just someone who maybe sells, or
sold Osama Bin Laden a hotdog.
Benjamin: Remember
that all of this is secret. So, even if the definitions were clear, even if
we felt that they had narrowed it down more, it is all done in secret which
means that we never know who is doing the deciding. And I think the
underpinnings of the whole thing are so undemocratic.
Reminder
Robles: Do
you think this is a way to retroactively legalize what they have been doing
for years already?
Benjamin: The
Government says that it has been doing this killing based on legal memos
that the Department of Justice had put out before the killing of Americans
in September 2011, under the Obama administration. But this document has
still not been released.
So, the fact that it exists is meant to give them a legal cover, but the
fact that this legal cover is hidden, even from the people in the
Intelligence Committee, who are supposed to be doing the oversight leaves it
in this Orwellian kind of catch-22 that we have to speculate. Even with this
white paper, it isn’t the 40 page legal memo that exists that not only
should the Intelligence Committee and other people in Congress have the
right to see, but the American people should have the right to see it.
Robles: Of
course! You’ve been active in drones. A couple of months ago you were in
Pakistan…
Benjamin: We
took a group of 34 people to Pakistan to protest the drone strikes and tell
the people of Pakistan that we were disgusted by our Government’s policies,
that we apologize for the deaths of so many innocent people and for the
lawlessness of our Government. And it was quite amazing because we went up
to the tribal areas, we talked to victims of the drone strikes and their
family members and it was the first time that they had any positive
interaction with Americans: Americans who are saying that your lives are as
valuable as ours, your children are as valuable as ours. And we were well
received and on the major news every day because it was so unusual.
Robles: Back
to this white paper, not much of a reaction from the US populace. Why does
it seem that Americans aren’t very concerned about this?
Benjamin: I
think the big thing is that the American people didn’t know much about it
until this last year. And really, just these last months there hasn’t been
very much in the media. And the only thing the American people have been
told is that this is a positive alternative to US troops on the ground that
is expensive and that puts our soldiers’ lives in jeopardy. And so when they
see it in those terms and they hear that it is so precise and it doesn’t
kill innocent people, they have a false image of the drones.
So, I think it is important that we educate people as to the numbers of
innocent people who are killed, the illegal nature of these drones, the
ethical and moral issues that come into play when you are killing from an
air-conditioned room in an air force base in the US, killing people
thousands of miles away, that you have no understanding of who they are and
how they behave.
And then finally to understand the dangerous precedent that is being set
with so many other nations now getting a hold of drones and what kind of
chaos and lawlessness we are setting up by our example.
Robles: The
due process clause. Normally, even if they find that you are eligible for
execution, I mean normally, shouldn’t a person have the right to defend
themselves? And this white paper actually negates that right.
Benjamin: I
think Americans should be shocked when they hear that our Government now
says that we don’t have the right to a judicial process. The due process is
something so vague that it can mean that the President and his aides sit in
a room in the White House on “Terror Tuesdays” and put your name on a “kill
list”.
Robles: Anything
you want to finish up with? It’s all yours.
Benjamin: I’m
excited that there is more awareness and that we have been building a
protest movement at the bases where the drones have been operated. And we
will be very vocal at the hearing tomorrow with John Brennan. We know there
are questions that our senators won’t ask him, that we will ask, and we also
have questions for our senators as well, as to how they let this get to this
point and how they allowed the CIA that is supposed to be an
intelligence-gathering organization to become a death squad.
You were listening to an interview with Medea Benjamin the co-founder and
director of Code Pink.
Read more: http://voiceofrussia.com/2013_02_07/How-did-they-allow-the-CIA-to-become-a-death-squad-Medea-Benjamin/
6 February, 12:59
Heightened
Tensions in the DPRK as
War of
Words
Escalates: Pyongyang to
Respond
Aggressively
Surrounded by enemy forces, besieged by sanctions, demonized by the Western
propaganda machine, the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea says it
will fight back and
that anyone who encroaches upon its dignity and sovereignty with any form of
"sanctions" will not be able to avoid deadly retaliation. The media is rife
with speculation as to what that retaliation may be but one thing is
certain, unless pushed into a corner, the DPRK will never launch a first
strike. That would be literal suicide.
In response to new sanctions and more threats from the West North Korea has
said that they would be forced to take more serious measures than a simple
nuclear test. Although there was no exact description what those measures
would be, the West has ramped up the anti-Korean propaganda to new levels,
forcing the North to issue numerous responses.
The Russian Federation has urged North Korea to show restraint despite the
heightened level of confrontation evident in the latest escalation of
tensions between North Korea and South Korea, the United States and their
allies.
North Korea continues to be pushed into a corner with dozens of statements
being released by various officials and committees of the People’s Republic
of North Korea. The Secretariat of the Committee for the Peaceful
Reunification of Korea (CPRK) issued a press
release on
the second of February full of extremely strong language against the South
and the United States.
The language of the CPRK’s statement titled, “DPRK Will Retaliate against
Provokers: CPRK Secretariat” was unusually strong. In the statement they
called Chon Yong U, chief of Diplomacy and Security in Chongwadae, Ryu U Ik,
the Minister of Unification, confrontation maniacs of South Korea who along
with others had said that "the north should choose one, either survival or
nuclear weapons" and "stronger sanctions that the north can hardly hold off
have to be imposed".
The almost open threat by the South to destroy the DPRK was a sign of the
increasing assertiveness of the South, something that has been stoked by the
US Forces in the region and the new sanctions that have been imposed on
North Korea by the United Nations.
With regards to the statements made by Official Seoul the CPRK stated the
following: “The U.S. and the south Korean regime do not hesitate to make
such outbursts as calling for not ruling out even military ‘sanctions’.
Warmongers are inciting war fever while touring units in the forefront
areas.”
The CPRK called intensified confrontation a “racket on the part of the U.S.,
the Lee group and other hostile forces” and that, “… the UN "resolution on
sanctions" against the DPRK is a product of the deliberate and planned
intrigues to escalate the hostile steps against it to bar it from building
an economic giant, and to isolate and stifle it. But they are seriously
mistaken.”
In equally threatening language the CPRK echoed calls made by other official
representatives for unspecified moves in response to what it sees as
deliberate actions to destroy the DPRK and a hint at just how bad the new
sanctions may be affecting the North Korean people: “The "sanctions" of the
enemies further hardened the will and strength of all service personnel and
people of the DPRK to defend their just cause and build the most powerful
nation, a highly-civilized socialist nation under the banner of justice.”
“The DPRK is fully ready for both economic and military "sanctions", and
anyone who encroaches upon its dignity and sovereignty even a bit with any
form of "sanctions" will not be able to avoid deadly retaliation.”
Again what that retaliation is, is not clear.
According to South Korea’s Yonhap News Agency, citing media
reports from
the DPRK: “North Korea will "ruthlessly strike" back if the United States
launches preemptive attacks on its nuclear facilities.”
Yonhap quoted the Minju Chosun, a newspaper published by the North's Cabinet
and the Korean Central News Agency (KCNA) as saying: "If the United States
and warmongers attack and try to weaken us, such expectations will be a huge
miscalculation…” and “…if North Korea is attacked, its military and people
will rise up and mercilessly repel the perpetrators and start a victorious
war of national unification."
Meanwhile amid reports that a third North Korean nuclear test is soon to
take place Sky News reported that
a strange video appeared on You Tube, showing a North Korean dreaming of an
attack on the United States of America. According to Sky News “The video was
released via a website linked to the North Korean state news agency.”
The official DPRK news agency KCNA issued a statement which read: "The DPRK
has drawn a final conclusion that it will have to take a measure stronger
than a nuclear test to cope with the hostile forces' nuclear war moves that
have become ever more undisguised."
The South has reported that the DPRK may stage a double nuclear test but has
not provided details to support the claim and the South Korean Ambassador to
the United Nations said a North Korean nuclear test "seems to be imminent."
North Korea which is struggling under intense sanctions and whose people are
paying the price for, the “sanctions” imposed on the country, sees the
development of its nuclear program as a right and a necessity. A right, the
same as any country has, to develop cheap and efficient nuclear power, and a
necessity, to protect its sovereignty and its territory from attack and
invasion by the South and the United States, two countries who continually
hound and provoke it.
North Korea knows that one of the few things stopping the West and the South
from launching a full scale invasion is the fact that they are afraid that
the DPRK may in fact have a nuclear weapon which it may use to defend
itself. After the disarming or Iraq, Libya and other countries which were
then invaded, the DPRK knows that it cannot afford to stop its nuclear
program, it is the main deterrent they have.
The DPRK also knows and has been very careful in not making initial
provocative statements but continues to respond aggressively to threats from
the South, it is also aware that any first strike would be suicide as it has
seen the US building up its forces all over the region.
In the latest scandal the West is following the same old script we have seen
time and time again, namely: while provoking and carrying out aggressive
in-your-face- policies, imposing sanctions and building up military forces
near a country’s borders, this time the DPRK, the West claims the DPRK is
the aggressor and must be dealt with.
North Korea is wise enough and mature enough to refrain from any act of
aggression against the South and the West, but it must walk a fine line
between showing it has might and can defend itself and making sure it does
nothing that can provoke an open military confrontation, hence the
aggressive statements in its own defense.
While South Korea enjoys a relatively prosperous existence and is
comfortable that it has the United States to defend it, the North sees
itself as more and more being pushed into the corner and the people as well
as the sate are ready to fight to the end in what for them is a do or die
situation. Sanctions are not softening the resolve of the DPRK, but the
opposite is quite true. The DPRK is growing harder as South Korea is growing
softer.
With the United States attempting to consolidate its power and bring the
entire region under its sphere of military and economic influence, the DPRK
is country that they believe has to go. As does any country that follows
independent and robust foreign and internal polices and as with any
communist country.
The DPRK has the right to defend itself and to defend its sovereignty, but
it is complete nonsense to believe that they would launch any kind of a
first strike.
Read more: http://voiceofrussia.com/2013_02_06/Heightened-tensions-in-the-DPRK-as-war-of-words-escalates-Pyongyang-to-respond-with-unpredictable-nuclear-strike/
6 February, 12:03
Nobel-Peace-Prize-Winning “Assassination Incorporated”: White Paper
Justifies
Even
the
Killings of US
Citizens
A US
Department of Justice white paper,
justifying the killing US citizens is currently in the spotlight worldwide.
However the paper does more, it gives “high-level officials” the right to
order the killing of anyone, anywhere and under any circumstances and frees
them of any responsibility as long as they have determined the person
assassinated posed an imminent threat. Meaning the US can now kill anyone,
if they think they “might” do something, and it will be in justifiable
“self-defense”.
Normally self defense, especially when lethal force is applied, requires an
imminent and real physical threat. If you throw a punch I have the right to
punch you back or if you point a gun at me, I have the right to shoot you.
The US has now decided if an official “thinks” you are “planning” to throw a
punch, they can kill you, in self-defense, before you even make a fist.
It is therefore a stretch of logic to say that an imminent threat exists
when there is no real or tangible physical evidence to back that threat up.
According to the US Department of Justice, any person deemed to be a “senior
leader” of al-Qaeda or an “associated organization” is constantly planning
to attack America and is a target, but soon, if this is allowed to stand,
anyone deemed to be in any way connected to al-Qaeda, or an associate, will
be deemed an “imminent threat” and subject to extra-judicial execution.
So basically, on a personal level, if you follow their logic: if you merely
“believe” someone is planning to commit an act of violence against you or is
an imminent threat to your safety, you can kill them and it’s okay.
The first paragraph of
the DOJ white paper attempts to convince the reader that the scope of the
findings and the paper itself only applies to “senior operational leaders of
al-Qaeda or an associated force”. It also lays out the three conditions
which must be met to consider the assassination of an American legal, “in a
foreign country, outside the area of active hostilities”.
The attempt to explain that the paper relates to only senior leaders is
obviously a distraction from the fact that such a finding can and will be
easily updated and expanded to include other categories once such conditions
are adopted and legalized.
The use of the words “associated force” is troubling because possibilities
for interpreting that term are many and so far reaching that it could, if
one wanted to, include almost anyone. For example: a journalist sympathetic
to al-Qaeda, a banker who inadvertently transferred al-Qaeda funds or even a
doctor who treated a supposed al-Qaeda operative. The DOJ attempts to define
that term as co-belligerents under the laws of war.
In practice it would be more likely that any US citizen associated with any
group anywhere in the world that the US does not like and that the US brands
as “al-Qaeda associated” will be targeted for assassination. The language
and conditions are so broad that almost anyone could be deemed to meet the
criteria.
The three criteria that must be met for the US to carry out what is no more
than an extra-judicial execution of an American citizen are as follows: 1.
An informed high-level official must make the determination, 2. Capture is
infeasible but the US continues to monitor whether it becomes feasible 3.
The operation is carried out under applicable law of war principles.
Again problems, first of all an “informed high-level official” could be
anyone from the Attorney General to the president. This is also a problem
because it grants single individuals the right to issue assassination orders
as opposed to a court or another body. The term “capture is infeasible” can
be, again, used so broadly that almost any circumstance could fall within
that category and defining such is subjective. The last is telling and
troubling, troubling because there has never been a formal declaration of
war against al-Qaeda and telling because the authors know the “rules or laws
of war” do not apply, so they use the word “principles”.
Lastly the term “… outside the area of active hostilities” makes it legal to
target Americans anywhere in the world, including in the U.S.
Paragraph 2 states
the President has the authority to defend the country and that there exists
an armed conflict “with” al-Qaeda under international law. Therefore they
argue the assassination of a US citizen who has joined al-Qaeda is “not
unlawful”. The DOJ states that such an operation would be “consistent with
international legal principles of sovereignty and neutrality” with the host
nation’s consent or after “a determination that the host nation is unable or
unwilling to suppress the threat…”
Again the DOJ does not use the word “war” to describe its al-Qaeda-based
“War on Terror” and they give the President complete authority to kill
whoever he deems is a threat. The DOJ says assassinating a US citizen is
“not unlawful” again avoiding the word “legal” because in reality such an
act of extra judicial execution is illegal.
The DOJ stating “consistent with international legal principles” again is
disingenuous and eschews the use of the term “international law”. Stating
that with the consent or without if the host nation does not want to allow
it, basically allows the US to now “legally” violate the sovereignty of any
country (something they are already doing) in order to assassinate anyone
they view as a threat.
Paragraph 3 states
that citizenship and due process are not factors when they are “balanced
against the United States’ interest in forestalling the threat of violence
and death to other Amerticans… That arises from an individual… who is
plotting against the United States.
Basically if the government says you are a threat, even if you are a
citizen, they can kill you and there is nothing you can do about it. The
next paragraph continues along the same vein stating that the killing of US
citizens who are “senior operational leaders” is neither illegal under laws
barring the killing of US citizens abroad nor a war crime.
Section I, paragraph 5 starts
out by repeating “… the US is in an armed conflict with al-Qaeda and its
associated forces” again the words “at war” are not used and as throughout
the document the term: “The US is in an armed conflict “WITH” al-Qaeda and
its associated forces” is repeated. In a cursory reading the use of the word
“with” instead of, for example: “against”, might not seem important, but
when one dwells on the fact that the US has been “secretly” working “with”
and funding al-Qaeda in places such as Libya and Syria, as they did in
Afghanistan against the Soviet Union when the USSR was asked to assist the
government of Afghanistan, the term is indeed important. 9-11 is of course
mentioned.
Paragraph 6 attempts
to classify someone who is connected to al-Qaeda as a “part of enemy forces”
and thus is subject to death.
Paragraph 7 is
interesting because it seems to contradict paragraph 2 and say the US is a
“non-international conflict with al-Qaeda”. Paragraph two said: “the
conflict exists under international law”. But as we see it is not an
international conflict. The reason for this is because the US is supposedly
at war with a “transnational non-state actor”, the whole basis for the
“Global War on Terror”, which means the US can attack and strike in any
country where there exists the threat of al-Qaeda.
Paragraphs 8 to 10 justify
the US launching attacks in any country being used as a base by al-Qaeda,
which by the way, means “The Base”.
Section II Part A, paragraphs 12 to 14 give
justification why assassination targets do not have the right to due process
and state that if the government determines a threat and the three criteria
that are stated in the beginning are met, then killing Americans is okay.
Paragraph 15 repeats
the events 9-11 in detail and further seeks to justify the endless and
worldwide nature of the “War on Terror” and pre-emptive assassinations by
stating that terrorists plan and move and it is impossible to predict when
an attack will occur. So according to the US Department of Justice, it is
okay to kill them before they commit their “crime” as it is to kill
Americans, “who may pose an imminent threat”.
Paragraph 16 claims
al-Qaeda is “constantly planning attacks” thus they are always fair game.
Paragraph 17 says
if al-Qaeda is a threat then any associate or member is a threat.
Paragraph 19 justifies
the use of drones and smart bombs by saying there are no rules against them.
Part B, Paragraph 21 gives
the justification for assassination when someone is attempting to escape, in
short, allowing the US to shoot you in the back.
Part C Paragraph 23 states
that there is no proper judicial forum to evaluate the considerations. In
other words there is nowhere for the people to redress the government.
Section III, Parts A, B and C, Paragraphs 24 to 34 are
sickening to read as they attempt to provide the legal justification for the
government and officials to commit murder and assassinations under any
circumstances when they deem necessary. The way the Department of Justice
has twisted the act of cold-blooded unprovoked murder into something lawful
and in self-defense is chilling and completely and totally morally
reprehensible.
The conclusion of section III is that under the “public authority doctrine”
and if the murder is committed “in a manner consistent with the fundamental
law of war principles” such murders are “not unlawful” and do not “violate
the assassination ban” and that if the person is deemed a “threat” even if
they have not actually done anything “yet” then killing them is in
“self-defense” and the murder is a “lawful killing” and does “not violate
the assassination ban.”
The paper also concludes that even if someone is not in active combat or has
removed themselves from operations but is still considered a “senior
operational leader” they can be assumed to be actively planning and thus are
subject to being killed, and even in this case the murder cannot be called
illegal or fall under the category of assassination.
In
conclusion the paper allows the United States of America to murder anyone
they want, anywhere they want, whenever they want, under any circumstances,
and whether the person is guilty of aggression or not. And no one who takes
part in the murder will be guilty of a crime, provided of course that they
deemed those murdered, to be a threat.
Read more: http://voiceofrussia.com/2013_02_06/Nobel-peace-prize-winning-Assassination-Incorporated-White-Paper-justifies-the-killings-of-US-citizens/ 5 February, 17:00 Sweden No Longer Neutral, Drones Totally Illegal
Agneta
Norberg
In part 2 of an interview with the Voice of Russia, Agneta Norberg, Vice
Chair of the Swedish Peace Council, Member of Steering Committee in
International Peace Bureau and a member of the board of directors of Global
Network Against Weapons and Nuclear Power in Space discusses the facts
surrounding Sweden's non-neutrality and the country's involvement in NATO
and Western military expansion. Ms. Norberg gives her views on drones which
she calls "murder machines" and the development and testing of drones in
Sweden, including a new drone being developed in a joint European project.
Robles: How
does Sweden officially explain that they allow these installations? And do
you think all these maneuvers are designed to intimidate Russia or to try to
exercise sovereignty on the Arctic?
Norberg: Well,
when we drift to Arctic, I think there are two things going on here. When
they are interviewed, those who are in charge of these maneuvers, they
always answer that this is for the Arctic, they openly express this – these
maneuvers are for the Arctic and the resources which will be available when
the ice is melting.
But the NATO maneuvers are so seldom covered in the news, in media,
specifically not here in the south, I live in Stockholm, up in the north, in
the local newspapers they are covered rather extensively. And they used to
send quotes from the newspapers for me, otherwise I wouldn’t have known it,
because the media doesn’t cover it in the south, in Stockholm, where most of
the people live.
So, it is, a sort of: secretly hidden from the public to understand what is
really going on. But when they are asked, they say: this is for the Arctic.
And also one thing I think you’ve mentioned is that Sweden is neutral.
Forget that! We are not neutral! We have for long abolished the neutrality.
We are not non-aligned; we are nothing, because we are openly conducting war
games with NATO.
But there is one difficulty because the people in Sweden and in Finland are
against. It is only about 19% of the Swedish population that accept NATO,
the others don’t. So, they have that problem here.
But I can see the lust, how they try to form an enemy out of Russia, and you
should understand this: how Russia now is demonized, again. And I’m so old,
so I remember how they were demonizing the former Soviet Union, always, and
almost on daily basis. And now we are there again.
So, we have here in one of the latest (Names Swedish newspaper in Swedish) a
picture of Putin and Russia is arming, here, and how the Russian bear now
starts showing its muscles. So, at the same time, as you have these military
maneuvers and military flexing of muscles, you seldom get information to the
public here.
I was speaking in Norway last summer and they didn’t know about these
things. I’m very often on speaking tours in the north. I was in Finland last
autumn and they didn’t know about these military maneuvers either. They were
really shocked when I told them.
So, here we are again, from the Cold War days, gradually Russia is the
threat. And when I talk to Russian people they are not aware of this. It is
like when I was travelling in the former Soviet Union, they were not aware
of how you were depicted and described as a big-big threat. And I think we
are there again, hiding what the NATO is doing in our country and in the
north, and describing the threat of Russia coming. There we are again.
Robles: Would
you say it is worse than it was in the Soviet times?
Norberg: It
is about the same now. We are in square one, we are back in the Cold War
sentiment in a way. But it is even worse now because during the Cold War, at
least Sweden had a posture that we are non-aligned and neutral. Not anymore!
We have left our neutrality, we have left our non-aligned posture.
Not openly, the neutrality we have left openly, but not the non-aligned
posture. I can give you an example: they are now training in the North
America (for) war in Nevada.
They were training together with the US in 2006 in Alaska. They went with 6
or 7 war planes to Alaska and made a huge maneuver outside North Korea
together with the US.
So, we are actively joining in different parts of the world. Of course we
are in Afghanistan now.
And so I think you have to start to understand that Sweden has quite another
position now and we are a NATO country. It is only a document that is left
to be done. That’s the situation now in Sweden.
Robles: Can
you tell us a little bit about what you think the US and NATO’s plans are
for the Arctic?
Norberg: I
can see that they are making a lot of war games together up in the north.
And I also know that the US and Canada are the same, I mean they are in the
same organization. Canada has lost much of what they had before. I have a
map in front of me where I have all the installations, and the North
American-Canada Command had merged together.
So, up in the north you have a very strong militarization from Canada's
point of view and they are building up their military as never before.
And one thing that I think is important to mention is the drones. Canada is
planning for a huge drone fleet, and so is Sweden. Now we have one of the
world’s biggest drones which is ready in the North European Airspace Test
Range which is one of the biggest in Europe for training drones.
Robles: What’s
your opinion on drones?
Norberg: They
should be banished, abolished or banned because they are terrible murder…,
we call them “murder machines”. They are conducted from Nevada test site.
They sit there in front of computers and kill people in Yemen, in Pakistan
and many places.
We have a huge training area: as big as Macedonia, called the North European
Airspace Test Range in the northern part of Sweden where they train these
drones. So, we are in this arms buildup, it’s rather dangerous I think.
The newest one is Neuron. It is a cooperation between Sweden, France, Italy,
Germany, Switzerland on one of the world’s biggest drones Neuron. That is a
prototype that is now ready this year.
Robles: What
is your opinion on the legality of drones because the users face no risk?
Norberg: They
are totally illegal. You sit in a bunker, you don’t see anything, you just
sit in front of a screen and see the target. We call them “murder machines”
because these are murders. They “say” they kill Al-Qaeda.
Agneta Norberg is the Vice Chair of the Swedish Peace Council, a member of
the Steering Committee in International Peace Bureau and on the board of
directors of the Global Network Against Weapons and Nuclear Power in Space.
Read more: http://voiceofrussia.com/2013_02_05/Sweden-is-no-longer-neutral-drones-are-totally-illegal-Norberg/
4 February, 21:57 Bin Laden's Death Changed Nothing
William
Blum
In part 2 of an exclusive interview for the Voice of Russia, In part 2 of an exclusive interview for the Voice of Russia, William
Blum,
a renown American author, historian and critic of United States policy,
continues his dialogue with VOR correspondent John Robles and gives his
views on the execution of Osama Bin Laden and the official version of the
events of September 11, 2001. Mr. Blum puts forward the theory that Osama
Bin Laden may have been killed in the initial bombings by the U.S. of
Tora-Bora in Afghanistan and discussed the fact that building 7 of the World
Trade Center was taken down in a controlled demolition, possibly for the
financial gain of the owners of the building.
Hello! This is John Robles, I’m speaking with William Blum. He is the author
of several books on US foreign policy. He also sends out a monthly
newsletter called the Anti-Empire Report.
Robles : Hello
Mr. Blum! Nice to be speaking with you.
Blum: Hi!
Robles : What
can you tell us about… Bin Laden, he was actually a CIA agent with the name
of Tom Osman. He toured US military installations, bought weapons and…
Blum: Installations?
Robles : Yes,
this was under the name of Tom Osman (Tim Ossman)…
Blum: I’ve
never heard that before.
Robles : You’ve
never heard that before? At the beginning they were funding him in
Afghanistan to fight the Soviet Union.
Blum: Yes,
right of course he was fighting on the same side as the US, or to put it
another way the US was fighting on the same side as Bin Laden. War makes
strange bedfellows.
That was the first of at least five instances where the US have fought on
the same side as people that we call terrorists. The latest example is
Syria. But Afghanistan was the first of those five.
I don’t see as much in this as many other people do. Bin Laden had his own
reasons for wanting to get the Soviets out of Afghanistan and the US wanted
the Soviets out for their own reasons and so they fought together. No big
conspiracy was needed for that.
Robles : What
do you know about his execution? And what do you think about his execution,
the way he was…
Blum: Well,
some people think it was staged, that it really didn’t happen, that he died
in the first wave of attacks by the US in Afghanistan, during the major
bombings of Afghanistan by the US.
Some people are convinced that Bin Laden died then. I don’t know for sure
and I cannot know for sure. And I don’t really care, I don’t think it is
very important. I don’t think that his death is important.
In my last Anti-Empire Report, or maybe the one before, I have a piece about
how that there is no difference at all, the US Government is doing the same
things it was doing before he died, including at home. They are suppressing
civil liberties at home just as much to the extent as they did when Bin
Laden was alive. His death has not made any difference at all, in a purely
practical sense, maybe psychologically it’s made some people feel good, but
that’s something else.
Robles : What’s
your opinion on 9-11 and who was behind it?
Blum: I
can accept all the flaws and shortcomings in the official report which I’ve
read and which have been well documented by the 9-11 activists. But that’s
not the same as my accepting that it was an inside job.
I’m not saying it wasn’t, it is conceivable. But that’s such an
extraordinary charge to make against any government, that they purposely
killed about three thousand of their own citizens just to gain some
political advantage, it’s so far out that one has to ask for a large measure
of proof. One just can’t just accept that on its face.
And I don’t think the 9-11 people, the investigators or the so called
truthers have provided this level of proof of that, I have asked many of
them to tell me what happened. If it wasn’t the official story, then what
actually happened? What happened to the planes and the passengers? And who
were the pilots? And so on. What actually happened?
Robles : What’s
your opinion on what actually happened?
Blum: I
don’t know, and they don’t either. But I’m not making these wild assumptions
that there was an inside job, that the planes were being piloted by remote
control and so on.
You really have to have a lot of proof for all these theories. And even, we
don’t know that building 7, which they insist and the pictures show that it
was a controlled demolition… I agree that it looks that way. But what do I
know? I’m not an expert. And experts have said it was a controlled
demolition.
But there is also the story floating around that the owner of the building
wanted it demolished for his own personal financial reasons. And that seems
to have been forgotten about.
So, I don’t know. I cannot give ultimate answers to these questions but I
can say that I am not convinced yet that it was an inside job.
Robles : Ok,
but you are not convinced that the official version was 100% accurate?
Blum: I’m
convinced that it was not 100%, I mean there are too many things they say
which have been shown to be false and too many questions raised. I wouldn’t
expect that commission to issue any really good truth on such a sensitive
subject. But that still doesn’t tell me what actually happened.
Robles : You
were listening to an interview with William Blum. He is an American author,
historian and critic of US foreign policy. He’s written many books
concerning US foreign policy and the CIA. He focuses on assassination plots
and CIA interventions. He publishes a monthly newsletter called the
Anti-Empire Report.
Read more: http://voiceofrussia.com/2013_02_04/Bin-Ladens-death-changed-nothing-Blum/
4 February, 16:30 Against Phoney-9-11-War-on-Terror-Paradigm
James
Corbett
Download audio fileDownload audio file
In an interview to the Voice of Russia, James Corbett, the writer, editor
and publisher of the Corbett Report, talked about the ever-present threat of
a WWIII scenario developing from any number of threats. According to Mr.
Corbett, the crimes, excesses and involvement of the Bush Administration in
the events of 9/11 were an important reason for the creation of alternate
media outlets. He spoke about the suppression of the reality behind the
world's central banking systems as another chief motivator to get the truth
out.
Robles: What
would you say is the single biggest threat to the world today?
Corbett: That’s
sadly a very good question, not because there’s one identifiable answer, but
because there’re several candidates. And I think we could seriously face the
possibility of an economic collapse, because of the global system of central
banking and debt-based fiat money which has stretched to its breaking point
and really threatens the economical livelihood of hundreds of millions of
people around the world.
We could look at the ever-present threat of a WWIII scenario developing from
any number of threats; from confrontation between the West and Iran and a
scenario involving an exchange between India and Pakistan to some scenario
involving North Korea or Taiwan upsetting the balance of powers in East
Asia.
Robles: In
your work, you’ve talked to thousands of people. Could you name three that
really stood out and why?
Corbett: If
I was pressed to think of just three off the top of my head, the first that
would come to mind is Bob Chapman. He was the world’s largest silver and
gold stock broker for a number of decades before his retirement in the
1980s. But he also was a prolific publisher of: Garry Allen, amongst other
authors and researchers.
And he came to found his own International Forecaster newsletter, which was
going out on a by-weekly basis there for a number of years. And the
International Forecaster was one source of information that I looked forward
to certainly every week to find out what was happening on the global,
economic, financial, societal and geopolitical stage. Bob Chapman had a
wealth of information and experience in that.
He had been a former military navy intelligence officer after WWII, had a
lot of experience, spoke many languages and had a lot of connections around
the world. So he had a wealth of information and, sadly enough, he did
succumb to cancer last year and passed away. He was very greatly missed by a
lot of people around the world. I’ve heard from quite a few of them.
The second name that comes to mind is Sibel Edmonds, she’s a whistleblower
who was working in FBI language translation unit in the Washington Field
Office in the wake of 9/11, when they had fired a number of people because
of a backlog of information that they had to translate.
Basically, in the wake of terrorist attacks there was so much information
that they had not translated, that they suddenly realized it might be
important.
So they hired a number of translators, including Sibel Edmonds and she was
working in the translation unit, but the information that she was coming
across, combined with the reticence of some of some of her FBI colleagues
and superiors to actually look into the information that she was uncovering,
started to raise her suspicions and eventually - there’s quite a big back
story about this - but eventually she was approached by certain people who
were working for foreign governments, including the government of Turkey,
within the FBI that were basically starting to try to incorporate her into a
spying/nuclear smuggling ring that was going on within the FBI.
When she attempted to blow the whistle, she kept encountering resistance
from the superiors and the people who were put into place, supposedly to
collect the information from the whistleblowers.
She tried that for a number of years and was actually gagged by the Bush
administration with a State Secrets Privilege, which, up to that point, had
almost never been invoked in the history of the United States, only a few
times. She was one of the few, and since then it’s became something of a
norm for both the Bush and Obama administrations to use that State Secrets
Privilege to gag people from using their First Amendment right to free
speech. But Sibel did not stop and she has not stopped and she now runs a
website.
The third name that comes to mind, off the top of my head is Pepe Escobar,
who is an independent journalist. He writes for a number of outlets,
including the Asia Times online. And he’s absolutely just a complete
encyclopedia of geopolitical information.
Robles: During
the Bush years, you were one of the few voices speaking out. Did you pay
price for telling the truth?
Corbett: One
thing that particularly struck me when I started the website and was
speaking quite vocally against the Bush administration at that time and the
excesses of that administration and the crimes that had been committed by
that administration.
I was approached by many of my friends who were not skeptical about the
information I was presenting, regarding the U.S. government complicity in
the 9/11 attacks and other such things, but they were more concerned that I
would be out on some type of list, some Homeland Security list of some sort
of whatever it was.
And I was approached by a number of friends in that regard, which I find
somewhat surprising, because to me, that was the exact reason that I started
the website. If I wasn’t concerned about the existence of the lists, I
wouldn’t have started the website and started to speak out against the
entire phony-war-on-terror-paradigm that the Bush years unfortunately
brought into the global geopolitical theatre.
So this was exactly what I was fighting against. I think the perspective
that we have to have is what price we pay for covering up the truth, for
concealing the truth, for ignoring the truth, for knowing the truth, but not
doing anything about it. That, to me, is the ultimate calculation at the end
of the day, even if I’m not able to accomplish anything whatsoever in terms
of a transformation in society or even amelioration of what’s going on, even
if I accomplish nothing in regards to that, I don’t think I could look at
myself in the mirror at the end of the day, knowing this type of extremely
important information and not doing my level best to get that out to other
people. So I really do think that the greater price to be paid is if we all
are silent on these issues.
Robles: During
your career, what was the most shocking thing you have ever heard?
Corbett: For
the most shocking thing I’ve ever heard, I think I’d have to go back to the
origins of my website and what type of information I was really
encountering, when I started to get involved in this.
It was a combination of things, but one of the things that really struck me
was, first of all, the documentary called “The Money Masters” and then other
information that I encountered that backed up the information presented in
that documentary. That really outlined how central banking actually
functions and where the money supply actually comes from.
And it’s not a very large step between finding out about how money is
actually created for the most part in most of the countries: in the Western
world, at any rate. And really thinking about how much of the information
has been suppressed and really kept from the general public, combined with
the information that this was, in fact, one of the central themes of
American history and the history of many countries around the world
regarding central banks and whether there should be a central bank and how
it should function and who should control it, who gets the control of
printing the money.
This was something that was really dwelt upon by the citizens for a long
time. And there were also political movements that arose around those ideas
and you had all these political dynasties and fortunes that swell and fell
upon these great ideas of how many and the economy should be organized.
James Corbett is the editor, webmaster and producer of the
Corbett report
Read more: http://voiceofrussia.com/2013_02_04/Speaking-out-against-the-phony-war-on-terror-paradigm-Corbett/
4 February, 10:52
Assange
Receives Yoko Ono Lennon Courage Award for the Arts
In New York on Sunday, in absentia, Julian Assange, the co-founder of the
whistleblower web-site WikiLeaks, received the Yoko Ono Lennon Courage Award
for the Arts 2013. Mr. Assange received the award for his work, which
according to a WikiLeaks press release, is awarded to people who have
displayed extraordinary courage and whose work has changed the world.
On Sunday February 3rd 2013, in an event attended by approximately 150
invited guests, WikiLeaks co-founder Julian Assange was awarded the Yoko Ono
Lennon Courage Award for the Arts. The guests included the Honorable Judge
Baltasar Garzon Real and the Foreign Minister of Ecuador, the Honorable
Ricardo Patino Aroca. From the Ecuadorian Embassy in London Julain Assange
delivered a speech thanking those who support him and WikiLeaks.
Although Mr. Assange could not attend the event as he remains trapped in the
Ecuadorian Embassy in London, England, he did provide a speech for the over
150 people who attended the event.
Receiving the award for Mr. Assange were the Honorable Judge Baltasar Garzon
Real, one of Assange’s lawyers and Michael Ratner the President Emeritus of
the Centre for Constitutional Rights.
According to the press release the Ecuadorian Minister of Foreign Affairs,
the Honorable Ricardo Patino Aroca and Daniel Ellsberg, the famous source of
the Pentagaon Paper, were also in attendance and gave speeches at the event.
Julian's speech in absentia was as follows: “First of all, I want to thank
Yoko Ono Lennon for her courage and spirit in granting me this award. A fine
woman whose many actions define her. The test for all of us.”
“People often ask me how I keep going. They ask as if my work was some kind
of burden to me. Nothing could be further from the truth. There is no
greater pleasure than fighting for your principles. There is no greater
pleasure than in fighting for those who have risked all to share your
vision. And there is no greater pleasure than seeing those who you admire,
in turn, move to fight for you.”
“And while the embassy that shelters me is still surrounded by armed police,
my voice is free. Within the constraints of the UK surveillance operation
outside, I am free to see my staff and my friends. Many have fought and
continue to fight to permit this basic liberty and I am grateful to them.”
Mr. Assange then made a rare comment to the Ecuadorian people: “I want to
thank the Ecuadorian people. I want to thank President Rafael Correa and
Foreign Minister Patino for their courageous and unyielding support. Their
stance strengthens, not just my rights, but the rights of political refugees
everywhere. Support them. “
He commented on the award and thank those who work for the WikiLeaks
organization said, quote: “I dedicate this award to our courageous sources,
supporters and to my staff. Through their courage and wit they are revealing
the true nature of our global human civilisation. This is how we may reform
it. Elevate it - and make it just, beyond its humble origins. Their courage
in documenting war crimes, gross human rights violations, and the corruption
of our societies is unequaled.”
Assange was gracious enough not to forget to thank some of those who have
paid the biggest price and have provided material that has exposed more evil
than anyone else in recent history: “I want to thank all our anonymous
volunteers and all those volunteers from Anonymous. You are unseen in your
work but your work far from unseen. But I want to specifically name some.
Volunteer, Aaron Swartz, aged 26. Political activist, hounded to death,
right here in New York last month as part of the broader political crackdown
against our ideals. Alleged source, now political prisoner Bradley Manning.
Bradley is now two weeks away from 1,000 days in prison. The longest
pre-trail detention in US military history. Alleged source, now political
prisoner Jeremy Hammond, detained without trial, right here in New York, for
the last 336 days as of today. Volunteer and alleged source, now political
prisoner, Gottfrid Svartholm, detained in Sweden for almost five months.
WikiLeaks banking blockade protestors Christopher Weatherhead, aged 22 and
Ashley Rhodes aged 28. Sentenced in the UK last week to 18 months and 7
months in prison respectively.”
In closing Assange thanked his lawyers Baltasar Garzon and Michael Ratner
who are accepted the award for him, and said that along with other lawyers
in the US, Europe, Africa, Australia, and Ecuador they would fight to make
sure that the rights of WikiLeaks are respected and that they can continue
their mission.
Regarding WikiLeaks being silenced Assange said this was a fantasy due to
the courage, tenacity, love and support of friends. He said they would
continue the fight to: “document the world, understand its institutions and
hold our civilisation to a higher standard.”
Read more: http://voiceofrussia.com/2013_02_04/Assange-receives-Yoko-Ono-Lennon-Courage-Award-for-the-Arts/
2 February, 23:03
Israeli
Attack on Syria was an
Unprovoked
Act of
Aggression
The recent attack by Israel on Syria has escalated the situation in the
Middle East and has now pulled even more players into the conflict which was
and has been from the very beginning an internal Syria conflict. Syria has
been torn apart by internal strife fueled by outside terrorists and
mercenaries and to attempt to paint a picture that in its embattled state it
poses a military threat to its neighbors is both disingenuous and moreover
an outright fabrication.
The United States of America has geopolitical plans for the entire Middle
East and pre-determined objectives for all countries in the region. The
simplest and most obvious objective is the bringing about the conditions
needed to assure stable and permanent access to the resources in the region,
namely oil, which the U.S. cannot exist without. The others motivations
include everything from societal manipulation, access to markets, the
opening of resource transit corridors and even religious based domination.The United States of America has geopolitical plans for the entire Middle
East and pre-determined objectives for all countries in the region. The
simplest and most obvious objective is the bringing about the conditions
needed to assure stable and permanent access to the resources in the region,
namely oil, which the U.S. cannot exist without. The others motivations
include everything from societal manipulation, access to markets, the
opening of resource transit corridors and even religious based domination.
Experts, observers, diplomats and almost anyone who has followed the Syrian
situation would agree that it is a given that the U.S. plans for Syria
include first and foremost the removal from power of elected President
Bashar al-Assad. What the real nefarious reasons the U.S. has for its desire
to remove Assad may never be known but it is crystal clear that the aim to
remove him and even go so far as assassinate him regardless of whether he
leaves office.
No matter what happens in the region or within Syria itself the mission is
the same and has not changed since day one. Just as the goal in Yugoslavia
was to get Serbia and the facts were constructed around that goa, the goal
in Syria is to get Assad, remove the Alawites and replace them with a
pliable western puppet regime.
The initial script was organizing public unrest, destabilizing the country,
blaming the authorities for civilian deaths and for the ensuing predictable
crackdown, and the demonizing of Assad either until the people themselves
removed him or until he could be removed by outside forces and “tried” in an
international court.
The problem for the U.S. from the beginning has been that cannot just go in
openly and assassinate Assad or invade Syria. There has to be a pretext, a
credible pretext that the international community and the world will support
and believe. The problem for the U.S. is that the pretexts is has tried to
create have not panned out.
The first pretext to allow for intervention and the removal of Assad was to
have been the deaths of civilians but that did not work out. In reality the
civilians being killed in the country are a secondary problem and are of no
real concern for the West, again their deaths were to be the reason for the
removal of Assad as had been initially planned.
The next major pretext was the shooting down of a Turkish warplane which had
violated Syrian airspace, but as we saw for several reasons that also did
not go the way the West wanted.
After that came the chemical weapons claim, from the tired old Iraqi script,
but once again the West failed to convince the world community of the threat
posed by Assad and the supposed chemical weapons he was said to have
amassed.
Now we have a new pretext being tested out by the West, not exactly a new
one but an old one with yet another actor. Last summer we saw Turkey being
pulled in as the world was supposed to be convinced that Syria was a threat
to Turkey, now the country under threat is Israel.
In an interview with the Voice of Russia Rick Rozoff said:
“To believe for a moment that the Syrian Government was arming Hezbollah
fighters with weaponry for use against Israel when the Government of Syria
itself is under siege from foreign supported insurgents, including
terrorists, defies one’s credibility.” Further: “… but I think also what
needs to be seen here, is the fact that Israel has now exposed itself as
being on the very same side as extremist elements, that is Wahhabi and
Salafi elements, backed by the likes of Saudi Arabia, Qatar and other
Persian Gulf monarchies in their attack against the Government in Damascus,
against the Syrian Government.” And finally: “… it is the aggressor who is
claiming they are being threatened and have to launch “so called” preventive
attacks, it is a complete inversion of the truth.”
Yes the new invasion scenario and the reason to remove the Assad “regime” is
that Syria is now a threat to Israel and warrants a preventive invasion.
The problem is once again indicative of a disease that has hit the United
States, one where intelligence is not used to determine policy but where
intelligence is manufactured to support and make policies possible.
As we have seen time and time again and objective is pre-determined and a
goal is set, then the facts are fabricated to make that goal possible. So
the script changes, the reasons change, but the goal remains the same.
Israel is the perfect surrogate for beginning a military operation against
Syria. Israel is a country surrounded by Islamic countries, supported by the
United States at every level, and is almost untouchable politically in most
of the world, as it has been since World War II.
A policy of preventive war was evident in Israel’s attack on Syria, an
unprovoked aggressive military attack carried out to guarantee their own
security.
Preventive war was first initially practiced by the Nazis at the beginning
of WWII. A preventive war is nothing more than an aggressive war under the
pretext of guaranteeing the aggressors own security.
The Russian Federation has officially condemned the Israeli attack(s) and
called them what they were; “… an unprovoked attack against a sovereign
state and a gross violation of the United Nations Charter and unacceptable,
whatever the motives are."
Israel must answer for this act of aggression; no matter how “bad” the
Western propaganda machine says the target of their attack may be and
hopefully Syria will be wise enough and exercise restraint and not launch a
counter attack in response to the provocation, something which they are
justified in doing, but which is what the architects want in order start an
operation involving an all out invasion of Syria so their ultimate goal may
be attained: the removal of Bashar al-Assad.
Read more: http://voiceofrussia.com/2013_02_02/Israeli-attack-on-Syria-was-an-unprovoked-act-of-aggression/
1 February, 23:24 Israel Preemptively Strikes Syria Why Can’t Syria Do the Same? Rick Rozoff
Voice of Russia regulars Rick Rozoff and Alon Ben-Meir, NATO and Middle East
experts respectively, both gave their views on the air-strike by Israel on
the sovereign territory of Syria near the capitol Damascus. Their views on
the matter are almost diametrically opposed with both giving solid
arguments.
Hello! I’m John Robles, I’m speaking with Mr.
Rick Rozoff. He is the manager and the owner of the stop NATO
website and mailing list.
John Robles: Can
you give us your views on the strike by Israel inside of Syria, supposedly
on a convoy, supposedly supplying Hezbollah, with supposed weapons?
Mr. Rick Rozoff:
Yes, those supposeds are all the warranted. The fact to the matter is what
we know from the Syrian Government sources: is that an Israeli war plane
launched an attack against a military research center within Syria, on the
outskirts of the capital city of Damascus. So, this marks a dramatic
escalation of the conflict, not so much in Syria, but against Syria.
And what it does is confirm, the suspicions and the statements made, not
only by governmental officials in Iran but by a lot of us throughout the
world, that part of what is going on inside Syria right now is a warm-up
exercise, if you will, a miniature version or a preview of what is intended
for Iran. So, the fact that an Israeli war plane could strike near the
capital-city of Syria is clearly I think an indication that Israel might
harbor both the intent and the means to try something similar within Iran.
That’s the first thing.
The second of all, the brazen unprovoked attack within the borders of a
sovereign nation, is, as I believe the Russian Foreign Minister Sergey
Lavrov mentioned over the last 24 hours since the Israeli attack, a crude
and flagrant violation of international law and should be condemned as such.
And what is necessary is for there to be an international investigation to
substantiate the Syrian Government’s claim of the Israeli attack and it
needs to be taken up in the United Nations Security Council.
If the situation were reversed, I can promise you that the United States and
its allies would not hesitate a second to take the case up, to demand that a
hearing be held in the United Nations. And this is what has to happen NOWbecause
what this is, is more than just a blatant criminal violation of the national
sovereignty of Syria, but it is clearly an escalation of the conflict to the
point where if you are sitting in Tehran, as well as Damascus, you are
wondering what the next move is going to be and this is why it think it is
so dangerous.
Robles: What
would you say to people on the Israeli side, who were claiming and who will
claim that Israel was defending itself?
Mr. Rick Rozoff:
To believe for a moment that the Syrian Government was arming Hezbollah
fighters with weaponry for use against Israel when the Government of Syria
itself is under siege from foreign supported insurgents, including
terrorists, defies one’s credibility. It is very difficult to believe that
could have been the case.
And again the Syrian Government’s case is that Israel bombed well inside
Syrian borders. This is comparable to for example the deployment by Turkey
of a war plane inside Syrian air space, summer of last year. But I think
also what needs to be seen here, is the fact that Israel has now exposed
itself as being on the very same side as extremist elements, that is Wahhabi
and Salafi elements, backed by the likes of Saudi Arabia, Qatar and other
Persian Gulf monarchies in their attack against the Government in Damascus,
against the Syrian Government.
So, you have this interesting motley medley of forces arrayed against Syria
at the moment, you have the US and its NATO allies, you have Israel, you
have the most backwards and benighted governments on the face of the earth
in the Persian Gulf all operating in tandem.
So, when the United States talks about democracy or praises Israel as being
the only democracy in the Middle East and so forth, we have to understand
with the military attack of yesterday that it is aiding and abetting, it is
supporting, it is complementing other efforts by the likes of governments in
Saudi Arabia and Qatar.
Dr. Alon Ben-Meir
Robles: Dr. Alon Ben-Meir he
is a professor in international relations and affairs at NY University.
Could you give us your views and your comments on the Israeli airstrike and
of the supposed convoy?
Dr. Alon Ben-Meir: Israel
has stated all along that if it detects anything that may constitute a
threat to its national security, it will act.
In this particular case the Israelis have detected two things. One, there
was a convoy moving from Syria towards the Lebanese border, apparently a
shipment carrying the SA-17, which is a very accurate anti-aircraft missile.
Several trucks actually.
As well there was also a military research center near Damascus and I think
the Israelis have concluded that the first convoy has to be destroyed
because they do not want these kinds of weapons fall into the hands of
Hezbollah and hence constitute a serious threat to Israel.
And the other one is the concern over the chemical weapons. I’m not sure it
was an attack on one or the other, I believe it was the two simultaneously.
Robles: Do
you believe they have the right to attack within another country if they say
that the threat is to their own security?
Dr. Alon Ben-Meir: It
is not what they say. I think every country, including Russia, the United
States, al European, anyone, if they feel there is a credible threat, and I
repeat the word “credible”, it is not an excuse to attack. But if there is a
credible threat, and I think Israel shared that with the United States
before it took action, then the country has the right to do whatever it
takes in order to protect national security interests. And I have no doubt,
any country irregardless of where it is and where the threat is coming from,
is going to take similar actions.
Robles:Using
that logic, I mean, then… We know that Patriot missiles have been deployed
in Turkey, so then if we follow the same line of logic, then I guess Syria
has the right to strike these Patriot missiles in Turkey. Why not?
Dr. Alon Ben-Meir: The
Patriot missiles in Turkey is a different story. These Patriot missiles are
there in a defensive posture. Every country has many-many such weapons in a
defensive posture.
Robles: Mr.
Rozoff, if you follow that logic, then wouldn’t that give Syria, for
example, the right to strike inside of Turkey which is basing Patriot
missiles and NATO armaments aimed at Syria?
Mr. Rick Rozoff:
It is an extremely vital point you raise. Not that the two of us believe in
pre-emptive or preventive attacks or wars. This is a notoriously criminal
concept that was really practiced, to its furthest degree, by the 3rd Reich
in the late 1930s and the early 1940s, so called preventive war.
That’s correct! If Israel can claim that Syria, under a siege as it is, is
capable in any way of threatening the internal security of Israel, then with
a thousand times, a million times, more justification, Syria can claim that
it is being threatened by its neighbor Turkey, that it is being threatened
by other governments in the area, including those I’ve mentioned in the
Persian Gulf, by the United States, by its European NATO allies, who are
providing material sustenance, as well as diplomatic coverage to terrorist
groups within Syria which are implicated in the deaths of thousands, if not
tens of thousands, of civilians in that country.
And the fact that Israel has now struck Syria makes it the aggressor and not
the other way around of course.
Robles: China
is being surrounded by NATO, Russia is being surrounded by NATO, I mean
there are weapons all around both countries that pose a threat to their
national security. So, if we followed that same logic Russia and China could
launch first strikes on the United States and all NATO countries I believe.
Mr. Rick Rozoff:
With far more justification again, than anything that Israel has the right
to claim, in regard to the attack of yesterday, or the American invasions of
Afghanistan and Iraq, or murderous drone hellfire missile attacks inside
nations like Yemen and Libya, and Somalia and all-the-way-down-the-line. Yes, it is in fact a nations’ aggressor, China and Iran which are being militarily encircled by the United States and its regional and global allies. And it is the aggressor who is claiming they are being threatened and have to launch “so called” preventive attacks, it is a complete inversion of the truth.
Read more: http://voiceofrussia.com/2013_02_01/Dr-Alon-Ben-Meir-and-Rick-Rozoff-give-their-views-on-Israeli-Air-Strike/ http://cdn.ruvr.ru/download/2013/02/01/1337862726/Robles_Ben_Meir_Rozoff_Israel_Syria.MP3
1 February, 17:00 The Politics of Aggressive War John Robles
When is it acceptable for a country to engage in an act of aggressive war?
Can it be justified to engage in an act that has been recognized by the
world community and laid down in international law as a crime against
humanity? Not just my humanity but all humanity?
These are questions the world community should have been asking itself
everyday for approximately the past two decades, but it has not. For it was
approximately that long ago that one of the world’s superpowers began
engaging in acts of aggression wherever it saw fit in order to show its
strength, military might and terrorize the world into bending to its will.
Suppose for a minute you and I are that power. We are righteous, rich and
powerful and control much of the planet through our economic manipulations
and massive media and political know how. We also have bombs and weapons all
over the planet ready to wipe out any adversary and the adversaries of our
friends. We are righteous, our God is the proper god and our people are
beautiful, fairly well educated and created in our god’s image.
We have more of a right to exist on earth and consume the world’s resources
than any of the other nations, because we are the chosen, the beautiful and
the strong. They are weak, poor, envious of our power, and worth almost
nothing compared to us. What is more their god is the wrong god and they are
not as beautiful and tall and proud as we are. The world is ours, we own it
and everyone else has to bow down before us. We take what we want, from
where we want, when we want.
Above all else is our moral superiority, we have been victimized in the past
and the world must side with us and allow us to seek revenge on our enemies
who want to destroy us because we are powerful, beautiful, free and our god
is better and more righteous than their god. Our word must be good enough
for everyone. If we say someone wants to destroy us, that is the way it is.
We do not need to provide proof or receive permission from anyone to destroy
whoever we decide is our enemy.
We know that one of us is worth thousands of them because we are the chosen
and live in God’s land, a land given to us by our God. A land we cleansed of
the savages and animals that had claimed it was theirs. We also know we are
worth more than them because we were persecuted for our God and our god has
chosen us over other false gods.
Since we are the chosen, if we have the idea that you are not worthy of life
and are a useless eater, we can kill you, we can bomb you and we can take
your lands. After all you are less worthy than us, we are the beautiful and
strong and we were created in our god’s image.
So if we have “intelligence” that your country is arming my enemies we can,
at our discretion and when we please, enter any country’s territory,
including yours, and murder the people and destroy their facilities. Sure we
can. After all we are the righteous and you are a bad guy in the eyes of me
and my friends. And what is more we control the international courts and all
of the international bodies that you could use to complain against us.
What is more if we decide we don’t like your ruler we will replace him,
assassinate him or publically execute him before your eyes.
But you will never complain or do anything against us because what is more
we control you, and if we decide you are a threat we will come to you, and
destroy you. Or cripple you, or torture you, or take you to a secret prison
and make you disappear forever. We can even kill you without leaving our own
bunker on the other side of the world.
Do you doubt our power? We have satellites, internet, cameras and even
tracking devices set up in your cell phone. We know where you are every
minute. We record your every move, we know what you watch and what you buy
at the shop and we know where your children are and we can kill them if you
get out of line. For you are nothing. You are the mud people and we are your
masters.
Did you imagine you and I were that power? Did you feel the righteousness
and superiority? Do you understand who we are dealing with? If you feel a
little uneasy, queasy or even nauseous that is okay. It means you are still
human and there is still hope, if you feel rage and feel you are being
mocked it is time you took off your blinders and imagined you were the
“lesser” people and your lands were being taken and your women and children
were being murdered before your eyes and there was nothing you could do
about it.
Wake up!
The opinions and views expressed here are my own. I can be reached at
Read more: http://voiceofrussia.com/2013_02_01/The-politics-of-aggressive-war/
1 February, 17:00 The US Was Killing Russians Defending their Homeland
Rick Rozoff
The story of the Polar Bear Expedition or what was also called the American
North-Russia Expeditionary Force is told by the Voice of Russia regular
contributor Rick Rozoff. The operation took place between 1918 and 1919 and
saw at least 5,000 US troops sent into Russian territory to kill Bolsheviks
in the North of Russia. The goals were to secure weapons cached in the
North, assist Czechoslovakian forces who were fighting the Bolsheviks and
overthrow the Communist Government.
Robles: Soon
we are coming upon the 95th anniversary of an event that very few people
know about. Would you like to tell our listeners a little bit about what
that event is?
Rozoff: Sure,
I would. And that’s something that first came to my attention through a… in
a very personal way which I’ll describe in a moment. But the event, or the
operation we are talking about, is something that is proverbially known as
the Polar Bear Expedition. The formal designation for it was the Northern
Russia Expedition or the American North-Russia Expeditionary Force. And what
that was, was the deployment somewhere in the neighborhood of 5,000 US,
troops starting in September of 1918 and continuing into at least July of
1919, in northern Russia, fighting armed forces of the Russian Government of
that time, which was after the October Revolution in Russia… So it was the
Government of Lenin.
But that American troops were sent, in some instances, after the armistice
was signed, from the trenches in France, and in some cases directly from the
state of Michigan to fight near the Arctic Circle in Russia.
In 1972 the last time I saw my maternal grandfather, my mother’s farther,
shortly before he died. I knew that he had been in Pershing’s Allied
Expeditionary Force, they’ve been with the US forces in France in World War
I. And I happened to ask him, I was a very young man at the time, and I
happened to ask him: what happened after the armistice was signed and the
troops were demobilized in France. And his colorful characterization of it
was, and I quote him, he said: “They sent us to fight the Bolsheviks”.
That’s a quote I can recall, you know, 41 years ago almost.
And in fact I knew that his unit had received basic training at what was
called at that time Camp Custer, after George Custer, “General Custer”,
later became Fort Custer and it is outside the Battle Creek, Michigan.
My grandfather was born in Michigan, though spent most of his life in the
Canadian province of Ontario. But when the US entered World War I in 1917,
he enlisted in the US Army and was trained in Camp Custer. And it is from
there, from the 85th division trained at Camp Custer, that regiments were
selected to fight in Russia in 1918-1919: that’s the Polar Bear Expedition
or operation.
Over a hundred US troops were killed in fighting, scores of others died
because of disease and other ailments, probably hundreds wounded. There is
no telling how many Russian citizens were killed by the American troops
during that period.
And what happened, almost four years ago now, a documentary film was made
and shown in the state of Michigan where Camp Custer is. And amongst other
people attending the show and praising the so-called Polar Bear Expedition
was the senior senator from the state of Michigan Carl Levin who at the
occasion of the unveiling of the film, stated, and I’m quoting from a
Michigan newspaper at the time, in 2009: “It is a perfect time for us to
meet, a perfect place. There are lessons to be learned in history, there are
lessons here.”
I’m not sure which lessons senator Levin was referring to but the fact that
for the last four years the United States has renewed its claim to the
Arctic Ocean, at the expense of other nations, Canada in the first instance,
but Russia most directly, one would guess. You know, the fact that the US is
celebrating its first effort in the Arctic region, the first combat
operation against Russia in 1918 and 1919, I think is something worth
noting.
Robles: So,
this was on Russian territory, it was on Russian soil and this involved…
Rozoff: Yes,
I remember my grandfather telling me, again I have to go back a number of
years, I tend to recall him saying he was deployed in Murmansk. But what
I’ve read on the subject subsequently suggests that it’s not terribly far
from there Archangel (Arkhangelsk) and that the US troops were sent there,
the traditional understanding of it evidently is that the British War
Minister at the time, who was Winston Churchill, prevailed upon the American
President Woodrow Wilson to deploy the troops, supposedly for a number of
objectives, one of which was to secure armaments that have been stored there
during the war before the Russian Revolution and the withdrawal of Russia
from the war.
The second of all,was, really to fight the newly founded Government in
Russia, the Bolshevik Government. And thirdly to support Czech Legion, which
were Czechoslovak, for the most part Czech soldiers, who had served in the
Russian Army during World War I and then became anti government, you know,
fighters against the Government after the Revolution of November 1917.
So, I think the third factor, that is supporting the Czech Legion, is a more
plausible explanation for the involvement of the US troops and suggests that
nothing less than countering the Russian Government at that time and
ultimately overthrowing, it was the intent of the deployment of the American
soldiers.
Robles: I
see. Can you tell us any details about the operation that people might not
have ever heard about?
Rozoff: With
what reading I’ve done on the subject, it wasn’t of course the entire
division that was sent. It was, I believe, two or perhaps three, regiments
from the 85th division that were deployed.
They arrived in Archangel at the very beginning of September of 1918, and at
least, according to one account I’ve read, they were placed under British
Command with other, evidently British armed forces, in the area as well.
The British supposedly had arrived in Archangel a month earlier, early
August of 1918, and apparently the Russian forces had already moved the
armaments or the material that the British intended to seize or secure, and
that led to an expedition up river evidently, the Dvina River, with acts of
fighting between indigenous Russian forces and American troops.
And by most accounts, early on, this was winter time of course, it was maybe
in October or so, the American campaign clearly had come to a dead end, it
wasn’t successful. Their attempts to link up with the Czech troops fighting
the Government of Moscow were unsuccessful. And it was prolonged into the
summer of 1919 but ultimately abandoned.
The casualties again that I… actually I’ve seen by one account, an estimated
110 American soldiers were killed in fighting with Russian forces.
Robles: And
this was actually US troops on Russian territory killing Russians.
Rozoff: People
defending their soil, you know, their territory.
Robles: Why
were they placed under UK Command?
Rozoff: I
suspect because the fact that British soldiers have been sent to the same
area, the Archangel-Murmansk region, a month earlier to prepare, it was
easier for them to get there I guess. But we know that Britain had played a
role in the interim period between the February Revolution in 1917 in Russia
and the October one, that is during the provisional Government of the
Kerensky period, in trying to secure the continued involvement of the
Russian Government, whatever it was, whatever it turned out to be, in the
war.
And the Kerensky Government indeed, I’m sure under the pressure and perhaps
no little bribery from Britain, France and the United States did continue
Russian involvement in the war, one which cost several million Russian
lives.
Mr. Rick Rozoff is the manager and the owner of the stop NATO website and
mailing list, and a regular contributor to the Voice of Russia.
Read more: http://voiceofrussia.com/2013_02_01/The-US-was-killing-Russians-defending-their-homeland-Rozoff/
31 January, 15:29 The Srebrenica Massacre was a Gigantic Political Fraud
Renowned author Dr. Edward Herman spoke with the
John Robles
regarding
the facts surrounding the Srebrenica Massacre, the pretext for the
"humanitarian" invasion of the former Yugoslavia, and takes apart the
"official" version that has always been promoted by the West. Dr. Herman
reveals that there were in fact multiple massacres at Srebrenica, and that
the killing of Bosnian-Muslim soldiers at Srebrenica (the West's pretext)
was in response to the killing of over 2,000 Serb civilians, mostly women
and children, at the location.
Robles: My
first question is about “The Srebrenica Massacre” and the way that the
establishment manipulated the media. Can you tell us, or give us some
insights, on that?
Herman: The
Srebrenica Massacre, actually I always put it in quote marks, because
actually there were lots of massacres in the Srebrenica area, the one before
July 1995 there were vast numbers of Serbs killed by Muslim, Bosnian Muslim,
forces who went out of Srebrenica.
One estimate is that there were more than 150 Serbs villages that were
totally wiped out and one study gives actually gives the namesof 2,383 Serb
civilians who were killed between 1992 and July, 1995. So then we’d call
that “The First Srebrenica Massacre”. Then in July 1995…
Robles: Just
to be very clear, these were Serbs, that were being killed.
Herman: Yes!
We’re talking about 2,383 Serb civilians killed before July 1995. And the
Bosnian Serb Army took over Srebrenica in July, 1995, and there were deaths
and executions after that. That’s what’s called in the West “The Srebrenica
Massacre”, but, in fact, that’s really mainly a political construct.
The numbers executed there were probably in the order of between 500 and
1,000. In other words, less than half of the number of Serbs civilians
killed before July, 1995.
And the Western claim is that 8,000 men and boys were executed in the quote
Srebrenica massacre, but notice these were men, always men, all men, they
were all soldiers, whereas those 2,383 civilians killed included very large
numbers of women and children.
We’re talking about the execution in the Second Massacre of essentially army
people. And of course they had never proved that there were 7,000 or 8,000,
even men and boys killed. The bodies in the graves added up to something
like 2,500.
A lot of those bodies were combat deaths. One of the beauties of the Western
propaganda system is that all the bodies they found after July, 1995, they
count as executed, even though we know very well that a large number were
killed in combat.
Reminder
Herman: Also
another important fact about the Srebrenica massacre is that all those
killings of Serbs took place coming out of an area that was supposed to be a
“safe haven”. Srebrenica was a safe place, a safe haven. It was supposed to
be demilitarized, but it never was.
So the Bosnian Muslim soldiers would come out to Srebrenica and they would
kill Serb civilians. This is all completely ignored in the Western media.
It’s as if the Serbs came in July and started to kill arbitrarily.
In fact, the U.N. military in that area, a French Offical name Phillip
Movion, was asked by the Yugoslav tribunal, “Why the Serbs did it?”
He said he’s absolutely convinced that they did it because of what the
commander of Srebrenica’s Bosnian Muslims did to the Serbs before July 1995.
This is the UN Army head, but you won’t see that in the Western press!
In other words, the first massacre is what led to the lesser second massacre
of namely military aged people.
The whole business of the Srebrenica Massacre is a gigantic political fraud.
There was a massacre, but it was a responsive vengeance massacre, women and
children were not killed.
One of the features of the “quote” Srebrenica Massacre, that is the second
one, is that 20,000 Srebrenica women and children were bussed to safety by
the Serb army. Women and children were not killed, only military aged people
and a very large fraction of those that did die, died in combat.
So my own estimate, as I said, is that maybe there were 500 to 1,000
executions. Vengeance executions.
Robles: I’m
sorry. How many?
Herman:500
to 1,000 I would say.
Robles: 500
to 1,000.
Herman:Yes.
So there was a significant massacre, but put it in its context! This was a
war, this was an army that had seen their own civilians massacred on a much
larger scale. That is completely suppressed in the West, as if the Serbs
came in to Srebrenica and started to kill because of a blood lust! It’s
absolutely a fraud!
So, I regard the Srebrenica massacre as a tremendous propaganda triumph. The
West wanted to go after Serbia and they avoided peace. They needed this
massacre.
Robles: You
said, about 2,380 civilians, women and children mainly…
Herman:Serbian
women and children, yes.
Robles: … were
killed initially. This was the Srebrenica…
Herman:The
first massacrebetween 1992 and July 1995. These were Serb civilians. There
were also hundreds of Serb military killed in that period, I am just talking
about civilians!
Robles: The
civilians, right! And then in retaliation approximately 2,500 Muslim…
Bosnian Muslims soldiers were killed.
That’s misleading, because the thrust of the 8,000 claim is that they were
executed but those 2000-plus that were killed, a very large fraction were
killed in combat.
Robles: In
combat. Okay, I see. I see.
Herman:Yes,
and the executions were, as I say probably in the order of 500 to 1,000.
Robles: Okay.
So those were Bosnian Muslims who were found to be directly responsible for
killing massive numbers of Serbian civilians. Right?
Herman:The
Serbs actually had lists of Bosnian Muslim soldiers they wanted to get, but
I can’t honestly say they were the only ones who were executed. But
certainly, a significant number of those executed were on those lists, those
vengeance lists.
Edward S. Herman (born
April 7, 1925) is an American economist and media analyst with a specialty
in corporate and regulatory issues as well as political economy and the
media.
He’s a Professor Emeritus of Finance at the Wharton School at the University
of Pennsylvania. He’s also the author of several books, namely
“Manufacturing Consent” which he wrote with Noam Chomsky and “The Srebrenica
Massacre: Evidence, Context and Politics”.
Read more: http://voiceofrussia.com/2013_01_31/The-Srebrenica-massacre-was-a-gigantic-political-fraud-exclusive-interview/
31 January, 15:00 ‘America's Nazi scientists fulfilling dream of ruling the world’ Bruce Gagnon
In an exclusive interview with the Voice of Russia, Bruce Gagnon shares
little known facts about the militarization of space by the United States,
the development of first strike space drones and the foundation of the US
Military Industrial Complex by Nazi scientists bent on victory in World War
III. If you thought missile defense and drones were bad, you haven't heard
anything yet.
Robles: According
to your organization the US Space Command has publicly stated they intent to
control space in order to protect US interests and investments. Is space now
US territory?
Gagnon: Well,
indeed the United States likes to believe that it is its own space, and
particularly the Space Command, who on their headquarters building in
Colorado Springs, just above the doorway they have their logo that reads
“Master of Space”. So, I think that it is quite evident that the Space
Command does indeed view space as US territory that must be controlled
because they clearly understand that all warfare on the earth today is
coordinated by space technology and that whoever essentially controls space
will control the planet below, in this case on behalf I believe of corporate
globalization. And so the Space Command in our thinking has become the
military arm of corporate globalization.
And so today the US is developing a whole host of technologies to allow it
to fight war from space, through space and in space, controlling not only
the Earth but also the pathway on and off the planet Earth, the pathway to
other planetary bodies as resources are discovered on other planets:
magnesium, cobalt, uranium, gold, water etc.
In a congressional study done back in the 1980s, the Congress gave the
Pentagon the mandate to develop the technologies to control the pathway on
and off the planet Earth. So, the Space Command sees its role in a very-very
robust kind of way.
Robles: Several
questions just popped up after what you just said. First one: how do they
intend to “control the pathway”, I mean there is not only one pathway off
the planet, I mean, how are they going to do that?
Gagnon: Well,
in this particular study entitled “Military Space Forces the Next 50 Years”,
they talk about the Earth-Moon Gravity Well, that whoever controls the
Earth-Moon Gravity Well, essentially with bases on the Moon and armed space
stations between, what they said were the L4 and L5 positions in space, they
would be able to control these.
And interestingly enough, we know that it was in fact the former Nazi
scientists that were brought to the United States following World War II
under a program, a secret program, called Operation Paper Clip. These Nazi
scientists that ran Hitler’s V1 and V2 rocket programs, they were the first
to bring to the Congress of the United States, this idea of having orbiting
battle stations controlling the pathway on and off the planet as well as the
Earth below.
So, today again there is the whole host of technologies that are being
developed by the Space Command. They say at the Pentagon that we are not
going to get all of these technologies to work, but through the investment
and the research and development in these various technologies, things like
“Rods from God”: orbiting battle stations with tungsten-steel rods they
would be able to hit targets on the Earth below…
Robles: They
call those “Rods from God”?
Gagnon: Yes,
they call it “Rods from God”. The new military space plane that is being
tested now by the Pentagon, it has shown its ability to stay in orbit for a
whole year at a time: an unpiloted space drone essentially. And then with
ground stations all over the planet that the United States has established,
what they call downlink stations that communicate with US military
satellites all over the planet. This whole network has been put into place
to really give the US, as they say in one of their planning documents,
“control and domination of space”.
Reminder
Robles: More
questions: The space drone that you just mentioned, it is actually… it’s
operational right now?
Gagnon: It
is called the X37B, it’s been over the past couple of years. The testing
program has accelerated and they’ve had three successful launches of it now.
Just recently, I believe it was just at the end 2012, was the last of the
missions, the third mission actually. But prior to that they had one of them
spend a whole year in space.
The role of this X37B, or the military space plane, is somewhat in dispute.
Some people believe that it is for surveillance, to spy on various
countries, like Russia and China. Or others believe that it is actually a
first strike weapons system whose job would be to fly down from orbit, drop
an attack on a particular country.
In fact the Space Command annually war games a first strike attack on China
set in the year 2016. And in one of the articles, in one of the industry
publications, Aviation Week and Space Technology, I read a report about the
first weapon that was used in one of these computer war game attacks of
China, was this military space plane. So, indeed they are war gaming with it
as a first strike weapon.
Robles: Now,
you mentioned Nazi scientists a minute ago, I mean, it is not a very widely
known fact that after World War II, I believe it was, about 400,000 Nazis
found refugee in the United States. Can you tell us a little more on the
scientists that were developing these programs and working with the US
Government? Can you expand on that a little bit?
Gagnon: Under
Operation Paper Clip, 1,200 Nazis were brought into the United States,
former Nazi intelligence. They were brought in to help create the CIA.
Wernher von Braun, the Nazi scientist that ran the V1 and V2 operations was
brought in. He became one of the leaders of NASA and he built the first
successful rockets that were launched by the US military after the Kennedy
Administration wanted to respond to the Soviet Union’s launch of Sputnik.
Other Nazi scientists were brought in to create US Flight Medicine programs,
the MKUltra LSD-drug experiments of the 1960s in the United States, where
people were jumping out of windows and killing themselves because they were
given drugs.
The people that were running these were the former Nazi scientists who had
been doing similar tests on prisoners of war and Jews and other people in
concentration camps inside of Germany.
So, the entire military industrial complex was seeded with these top Nazi
operatives. And I’ve always maintained that when you do that: “Is there an
ideological contamination that comes along with that?” My belief is: indeed
there is.
Robles: That’s
exactly the point I wanted to make myself.
Gagnon: Major-General
Walter Dornberger was the Head of Hitler’s secret Space Development Program.
He was brought to the United States to work for Bell Aerospace in New York
State after the war.
He testified before the Congress in the 1950s. And I can quote him, he said
to the Congress: “Gentlemen, I didn’t come to this country to lose the third
world war, I lost two already.” And he again was one of the first to layout
this vision of control of space, giving the US full control of the planet
Earth.
Bruce Gagnon
is the coordinator for the
Global Network Against Weapons and Nuclear Power in Space
Read more: http://voiceofrussia.com/2013_01_31/Americas-Nazi-scientists-fulfilling-dream-of-ruling-the-world-Bruce-Gagnon/
30 January, 23:04 Assange Running for Office May Affect his Asylum
Julian Assange has decided to run for public office in his native Australia.
This information came out in a Tweet by WikiLeaks and has been confirmed in
statements to the press by Kristinn Hrafnsson, the official spokesperson for
WikiLeaks, and Christine Assange, mother of Julian Assange.
According to the WikiLeaks Twitter page and media reports Mr. Assange will
be running for Senate on a WikiLeaks Party ticket. According to Australian
media Assange stated that plans to register a WikiLeaks Party are
''significantly advanced,'' and that "… a number of very worthy people
admired by the Australian public have indicated their availability to stand
for election on a party ticket.”
In an interview with Australia’s Fairfax Media Assange
said he meets the Australian requirements to “register as an overseas
elector in either New South Wales or Victoria and will soon be making a
strategic decision about which state he would be a senate candidate for.”
Whether the public will support his candidacy is another question altogether
but according to Assange he is encouraged by a number of Australian polls,
which had been conducted over the previous years and which he says show a
high-level of unwavering support for himself and WikiLeaks. The key question
will be if that support can be translated into actual votes in the polling
booth from an Australian Electorate that has been fed a steady stream of
anti-Assange propaganda for years.
Some might argue that this is just another media stunt by Assange to cause
another media frenzy, with the very important question be raised as to how
he will be able to serve the Australian people, if elected, and he is unable
to return to Australia. According to Fairfax Media Assange said if that is
the case a nominee would occupy his Senate seat.
Other questions arise as to how running for political office in Australia
might affect his political asylum claims under international treaties and
how Ecuador will react to the fact that someone who they are protecting
wishes to run for public office in a country where he is supposedly
unwelcome and would be in danger.
The level of danger to Ecuador and to the Ecuadorian President, caused by
their sheltering Assange, was once again underlined by Mr. William Blum, a
famous American writer and academic, in an interview I conducted with him
forthe
Voice of Russia.
Mr. Blum said he was not surprised by President Correa’s claims that the CIA
was planning to assassinate him before the presidential elections next month
and that sheltering Assange was by itself enough reason for the CIA to
assassinate him.
Mr. Blum said: “The CIA attempts to assassinate people for much less reasons
than that. Assange is the public enemy No. 1 in America. The U.S. is
obsessed with him and they are afraid that he will be issuing the release of
more classified documents so they’d really like to put him out of the way,
if they can.”
There are further questions that arise with the fact that Assange and
WikiLeaks associates have stated in the past that; Australia has done
nothing to protect Assange and that he would be handed over to the Americans
for prosecution if he set foot on Australian soil.
Whether him winning a seat to public office will provide him with immunity
from persecution and prosecution is also questionable and one might contend
that Assange would be better of concentrating his efforts on perhaps running
for office in the country that has granted him asylum and has been
protecting him even though it has put that country’s president in the
proverbial “cross-hairs of a CIA drone”.
According to Fairfax Media, Assange's biological father, John Shipton, is
the person on the ground organizing the formation of the Australian
WikiLeaks Party, and has already drafted the party's constitution which is
now under legal review.
For the party to be registered with the Australian Electoral Commission they
would need "... the confirmation of 500 members who are listed on the
electoral roll", says Fairfax Media.
As Assange remains holed up in the Ecuadorian Embassy in London it is not
clear how he would be able to carry out his plans but perhaps he has several
cards up his sleeve.
According to Mr. Blum Mr. Assange might prefer to be cautious and avoid open
spaces as: “There is a drone somewhere with his name on it, and if he walks
around in the world and he is not in the midst of a big city, he’s a marked
man. There’s a rocket with his name on it inside of a drone with his name on
it.”
Whether refugee Assange becomes Senator Assange, only time will tell.
The views and opinions expressed here are my own. I can be reached at
jar2@list.ru.
Read more: http://voiceofrussia.com/2013_01_30/Assanges-running-for-office-may-affect-his-asylum-claims/
30 January, 16:37 ‘The US Government has no right to take away guns’ – interview
In an interview for the Voice of Russia, Bill Wilson, talks about why
Americans have the right to stay armed. He says a small percentage of the
population is responsible for gun violence in America and that these people
must be aggressively dealt with. According to Mr. Wilson US law enforcement
in incapable of protecting the American people and it is time for the people
to stand up and take their liberty back.
Robles: My
first question is regarding violence and guns in America. And what you and
you organization propose to do to solve the problem?
Wilson: Well,
if you look at the country as a whole, obviously we have high numbers of gun
crimes and murders committed with a fire arm. So it strikes us as kind of
counter-productive or almost disingenuous to attempt to disarm the mass of
the public which are law-abiding and are not using fire arms for crimes.
Robles: What
about these… and this is a phenomenon that is pretty much only going on, in
the world, in the United States: these
repeated mass shootings!
Wilson: First
off, the incidents of mass shootings in the United States are no greater
today “mass acts of violence” than they were 20, 30 or 50, 60 years ago. And
in point of fact the incidents have actually become less!
The idea that somehow the United States is uniquely a violent country is
absurd propaganda. You don’t see Americans killing people of a different
ethnic group just for the hell of it!
Robles: I
don’t know of any other country in the world with so many mass killings. As
far as racial murders, I mean, we could argue about that, but. What does
your organization propose? Now, I understand from what you’re saying, you
are against gun control and disarming America.
Wilson: We’re
100% opposed to anything that reduces the right of an individual to have a
fire arm. And that the government: they don’t have the right, period, to
take guns away from the American people. That right was put in the
Constitution for a reason. And that reason was that an armed citizen was the
best defense from the government itself!
Robles: That
was at a time when there was actually… I mean, they could call up militias!
Wilson: You
have the police chiefs now of major cities admitting that they can’t
possibly help citizens in time. By the time you call 9-11 and if someone is
beating on your door, or you’re in a high crime area: you better be able to
defend yourself. Now! That’s the police chief of Milwaukee!
Robles: What
if you take the guns away from everybody, so nobody has them?
Wilson: You
have these single most egregious, strict gun control laws in the country in
Chicago and in Washington D.C., and it makes no difference. The criminals
have no problem getting guns. The only thing you do with your laws is you
disarm law-abiding citizens and you make them dependent on the state for
their own protection. We believe that all of the facts prove, and
inherently, that an individual depending on the state, we have another name
for that: it’s called “victim”, that the state is unable to defend, and can
not, in fact has proven it cannot.
Robles: The
U.S. government, the police services: they are incapable of protecting the
population, in your words.
Wilson: I
believe that the state is incapable of defending the people. American
philosophy is that if we’re free individuals, we take care of ourselves.
Only look to government when either: we have to or we’re forced to.
Robles: The
U.S. has the most militarized aggressive police apparatus anywhere on the
planet. And you’re saying that they’re not capable of protecting Americans.
Why? Is crime so high? I mean: are there so many guns that average people
can’t protect themselves?
Wilson: The
large number of guns in the United States is directly attributable, I think,
to the safety of most neighborhoods.
Robles: So,
okay, your answer to the problem?
Wilson: My
answer to the problem is an aggressive all-out confrontation of gangs and of
people who are already barred by law from owning a firearm.
Robles: And
these are mostly blacks and Latinos?
Wilson: Felons:
they’re not allowed to have guns!
Reminder
Robles: Now.
You are for less government. Now, who should be carrying out this crackdown?
Wilson: I
would contend that it is a proper role for government to provide for the
common defense to go after those gangs and those elements in society that
are perpetrating 80% of the gun violence.
Robles: And
if they don’t?
Wilson: What
do you mean, “If they don’t?” Then their reaction is to take away rights
from everyone else. I think that’s the height of insanity and collectivist
goal.
Robles: Why
are they doing that then?
Wilson: Why?
Robles: Yeah.
Wilson: Because
they fear the American people and they want to disarm the American public.
Robles: Why
do they fear the American people?
Wilson: Because
I don’t think they believe the American people will fall for the
collectivist totalitarian crap that they’re spreading.
Robles: Are
you saying that the government is afraid of an uprising or something like
that?
Wilson: I
think the government is afraid of an armed populace. I think that is the key
of it, yeah. That was the purpose to the Second Amendment. That individuals,
an armed citizenry could defend its freedom from those that would take it
away. That was what the founders wrote.
Robles: Would
you say that the American government, in the last say, couple of decades,
has been taking away your freedoms?
Wilson: I
think government has been taking away individual liberty for the past 50
years, yeah.
Robles: For
the past 50 years. Do you think it’s time that people stood up, or?
Wilson: If
you think you’ll get me to call for an armed uprising that will never
happen. Do I want to the see the American people take back their liberties?
Yeah, I do!
Robles: Okay,
not “armed”! Just stand up and say; “We’ve had it! That’s enough!”
Wilson: Yeah.
I do!
Robles: You
think it’s time?
Wilson: You
know? The interesting thing John is the disconnect between the elites in
this country, the political elites, regardless of party, and the average
citizen has never been greater. And I’m not talking about NBC polls that are
manipulated by the question. All you have to do is to go to neighborhoods,
go out around the country and talk to people and you can see that there’s a
total disconnect.
Robles: They’re
afraid of?
Wilson: I
think they’re afraid of the American people being in a position to not
accept their rules or orders. Why else would the act this way? Why else
would you have people talking about disarming the public, in a total sense?
Robles: So
you think they have manipulated and blown out proportion: gun violence, to
give them a reason to take away everybody’s guns right?
Wilson: Well.
The events in Connecticut were not 72-hours-old, and what you had was a
well-orchestrated campaign from the White House on gun control.
Nowhere was there a discussion of the fact of addressing the mental health
systems in the country. Nowhere was there a discussion of school security.
Nowhere was there a discussion of the incidents of psychotropic drugs and
shooters. There was none of that!
Robles: Sure,
I hear you! Of course.
Wilson:But
there was certainly a push for “We have to take guns away from the American
people!
Robles: From
everybody right?
Wilson:Yeah!
Robles: I
see.
Wilson: Somehow
that was the instant solution. And so you’re left with the question: Why was
the immediate knee-jerk reaction backed up with a very major propaganda
campaign aimed at one thing: Let’s take guns! Let’s take them!
Bill Wilson is the President for Americans for Limited Government Bill Wilson (http://getliberty.org/), a Maryland native born in 1953, is a limited government activist, referred to by one New York Times article as, “a member of Washington’s permanent class of ideological activists.” Wilson currently presides as the president of Americans for Limited Government; a Virginia based non-profit group promoting small government. He has been active in the limited government movement for more than 30 years, working with various groups pushing right-to-work laws, term limits and school choice.
Read more: http://voiceofrussia.com/2013_01_30/The-US-Government-has-no-right-to-take-away-guns-interview/
30 January, 11:02 Militarization of the Arctic: ‘We have to rethink how war is fought’
Agneta
Norberg
As the Arctic ice continues to melt and resources slowly begin to be
available the West has decided to begin the militarization of the Arctic
zone in a bid to gain control over the precious resources. In an interview
with the Voice of Russia Agenta Norberg, Vice Chair of the Swedish Peace
Council gives her views on the issue and also comments on the militarization
of Sweden, Norway and the North and the NATO expansion into "neutral" areas.
Robles: I
was wondering if you could tell me a little bit about NATO, in the Arctic,
in particular, can you tell our listeners about the radar installations and
satellite communications equipment they have set up in Norway and in
Scandinavia?
Norberg: Well,
I’m not a technician but I can tell you that recently it was published: a
book the Satellite War by Bård Wormdal – a journalist at Norwegian radio.
And it was a very important book, it was published in 2011.
I invited him to Stockholm in October when we had a day about the Arctic and
the situation in the Arctic. And what he says is rather? You have to change
your whole idea of how war is conducted. War is conducted via satellite and
via radar installations.
And for instance, to make it clear, to understand what we should understand
is: that the war on Libya, the former year, was conducted via satellite from
Svalbard. This is very dangerous because, this island, the Svalbard Islands
are a peace area undersigned by 14 different nations but Norway has allowed
the United States of America to deploy radar installations, and in
connection with the satellite they are conducting war. This is a quite new
understanding of how war is conducted.
Robles: NATO
and the US, they claim that their missiles, that are now surrounding Russia
and their radar installations all over the world, that these are somehow a
defensive shield.
Norberg: You
have to differ between all these: the national missile defense, they call
it. The Vardo radar close to the Russian border is one installation, and
there are also those in Poland and in Turkey, and they will also be deployed
in Romania it is a missiles shield. It is one thing.
The other thing are all the other radars and satellites which are informing
the pilots and the war planes how to bomb and where to bomb. I have a globe
here in front of me and it is almost all covered by US radar installations
for different purposes. So, you have this national missile shield, which
they claim is for defense, and it is an offensive weapon. It can be used as
defensive but it can as well be used as an offensive weapon. And one of
those radars are installed just outside the Russian border in Vardo.
I’ve been rather surprised when I’ve met Russian scientists and visitors in
Stockholm, last year in October, I arranged a seminar as I mentioned about
the Arctic, and the Russian representative, he didn’t agree with me that
this was a dangerous situation. The only one who agreed with me was Bård
Wormdal, the journalist who had written the book Satellite War.
There seems to be lack of understanding about the installations surrounding
the Russian border, that is my opinion. And I think it is rather dangerous.
Robles: Why
did the Russian expert disagree with you?
Norberg: Because
he said that the Vardo radar is not dangerous, and I disagreed with him. And
also Bård Wormdal disagreed with him.
This Vardo radar, a few kilometers outside Russian border, is rather
dangerous because it is in the missile defense system, so called missile
defense system. So, I think he was not aware of this. We disagreed rather
strong on this matter and that’s why I’m very happy that you called me so I
can tell this.
Robles: There
hasn’t been much news about that. Now, as far as NATO and the Arctic in the
north and Scandinavia and Canada, can you give us some details about NATO’s
plans and their current activities, especially in the Arctic, as it is
opening up, and resources are becoming available that were not available
before?
Norberg: Then
I think I will drift back to Sweden because during the last years, starting
with 2007, there’ve been huge war maneuvers on the Swedish and Norwegian
soil, with all NATO, and specifically the American State participating in
huge maneuvers in the north.
They were called for instance: Nordic Air Meet in 2007 where a lot of
countries took part, and then in 2009, it was Loyal Arrow: history’s largest
air maneuver in the northern part of Sweden and Norway, and also Finland was
the area. And then it continued with the Cold Response №1, a winter maneuver
in the northern part of Sweden and northern Norway. And it continued in
March 2012 with the Cold Response №2 with 16,500 soldiers from 15 different
countries. And then after this you had last autumn a huge maneuver in the
north called Nordic Air Meet №2.
So, there are ongoing military war games and some Russian military has
protested, specifically against Cold Response №2.
Nobody in Sweden would have known about this unless 5 Norwegian personnel
crashed into Kebnekaise, a mountain in the northern Sweden, we would never
have known about these 16,500 troop military maneuver.
So, it is ongoing, not on daily basis, but certainly every year it is about
two huge maneuvers in the north, and even in the south, in the Baltic. And
this should be highlighted I think.
Robles: Now…
Sweden as I understand is a neutral country, one point: how does Sweden
officially explain that they allowed these installations? And do you think
all these maneuvers are designed to intimidate Russia or to try to exercise
sovereignty on the Arctic? And in that regard, what moves have they made to
try to establish their own sovereignty over Arctic areas that were in
dispute?
Norberg: Well,
when we drift to Arctic I think there are two things going on here. When
they are interviewed, those who are in charge of these maneuvers, they
always answer that this is for the Arctic. They openly express this. These
maneuvers are for the Arctic and the resources which will be available when
the ice is melting.
Agneta Norberg is Vice Chair of the Swedish
Peace Council, Member
of Steering Committee in International
Peace Bureau (IPB)
and on the board of directors Global
Network Against Weapons and Nuclear Power in Space.
Read more: http://voiceofrussia.com/2013_01_30/Militarization-of-the-Arctic-We-have-to-rethink-how-war-is-fought-Nordberg/
Obama Equates Opposition to Gay Marriage with Miscegenation Laws Doctor Robert Gagnon
Download audio file
Read more: http://voiceofrussia.com/2013_01_29/Obama-equates-opposition-to-gay-marriage-with-miscegenation-laws-interview/
28 January, 12:29
The US did not set up US/AFRICA Command as a social service agency - Rozoff
Photo: © Flickr.com/Changhua Coast Conservation Action/cc-by-nc-sa 3.0
Regular Voice of Russia Contributor Rick Rozoff discusses Syrian defenses
and how they are preventing a Western invasion, Russian-Syrian cooperation,
the pretext of the war on terror to invade countries which he says was part
of phase 2 of the US/NATO global expansion, other pretexts used to justify
military expansion, the ties between al-Qaeda and the US and the massive
expansion by US/NATO into the African continent which will, in effect, bring
all of Africa under US/NATO control.
Robles: There’ve
been reports that Russian anti-aircraft and defensive systems are the only
thing stopping a US invasion of Syria. How much credence would you give to
those reports?
Rozoff: I
think that’s a very plausible contention. And that in fact over the decades,
during the Soviet period and in the post-Soviet period, that Russia has
maintained military-to-military ties with the Government in Syria and has,
as is the Russian policy, provided strictly defensive weapons to an ally, to
a client state, to Syria.
And that I’m sure anyone in the know about this thing wouldn’t be talking
about it. But I think it is a safe assumption that Syria has an integrated
air defense system that is substantially more advanced and effective than
anything that the countries that have been in recent years the victims of
US-NATO military onslaughts have had. For example Libya and certainly
Afghanistan, Iraq after over a decade of sanctions, and perhaps even
Yugoslavia. So, one of the factors, as you mention, that may have already
prevented more reckless provocative military action by Western powers
against Syria is the fact that Syria has the ability to protect itself.
As you are aware of and this has been mentioned by the Russian officials is
the deployment of the Patriot Advanced Capability-3 Interceptors in
Southeastern Turkey may in fact, in part, be to effectively enforce a no-fly
zone over the border land, you know, the area on the other side of the
Syrian border, to prevent aircraft, as well as cruise missiles or other
theatre missiles, from being used in that area, and as such, may be
preparatory to plans to cripple or neutralize the Syrian air defense system
on a more ambitious scale. That’s certainly a possibility.
While reflecting on developments in Syria, and even more so, developments by
outside players meddling in internal affairs in Syria, and I’m talking of
course about the United States and its NATO allies and their allies in the
Gulf Cooperation Council; the monarchies and sheikhdoms in the Persian Gulf,
we have to recall that Russia does have its only military facility in the
entire Mediterranean in Tartus, in Syria, and that, affecting, as the West
and its Persian Gulf allies intend to, regime change in Damascus would
inevitably lead to the eviction of the Russian Naval Forces, or their
ability to use the facility in Tartus.
We also have to recall that Syria is the only Arab country currently that
has particularly close state-to-state relations with Russia, as it does with
Iran, same category, and that with the displacement or the replacement of
the Government in Damascus we will see the entire Mediterranean Sea basin
turned into a Pentagon-NATO stronghold. With no… Libya being knocked out
last year and Lebanon presumably going the way of Syria, so that Russian
strategic interests in the Mediterranean would be seriously hurt with the
overthrow of the Government in Syria and its replacement by a US puppet
regime.
Robles: Can
you give a prediction, more or less, or see where things are going into
Africa?
Rozoff: Yes,
along with the so called pivot to the Asia-Pacific region, which is meant to
create an alliance based on a model of NATO by the US and the several of its
NATO allies, like Britain and France who are past colonial powers in the
East Asia and the Asia-Pacific region as a whole, to encircle and contain
China much as NATO expansion in Europe is aimed to do it vis-à-vis Russia,
but we are also seeing the increased military focus on Africa by the United
States, by the entire continent, following in the wake of the creation of
the US-Africa Command. The latest, and in terms of the number of countries
included, the largest, overseas US regional military command in history.
And because nations like China, Russia, India and others are reaching out to
Africa for trade, economic and natural resource purposes, we are seeing the
US increasingly intensifying its military presence and activity on the
continent. A recent article many of your listeners may be aware of,
documents the United States is to deploy, initially at least, limited
contingents of military forces to 35 nations in Africa. Depending on how one
counts them there are 54 members of the African Union, so that’s a pretty
sizeable percentage of the total number of countries in Africa. And that’s
in addition of course to the US-NATO war against Libya in North Africa last
year.
Robles: So,
what exactly are they going to be doing in these 35 countries?
Rozoff: Most
of what we’re talking about will be covert activities. The official
explanation is “fighting al-Qaeda forces in Africa”. I cannot believe there
are 35 nations in Africa that are threatened by al-Qaeda in Africa or
anything like it.
Robles: That’s
been the whole pretext of this global expansion and this global war on
terror. When is this going to stop? How is this going to stop? I mean: how
can they just keep doing this over and over? Invade country after country
after country on the same fantasy pretext? I mean: no one is ever going to
be able to stop this until we all become slaves or what?
Rozoff: You
are raising a very interesting question, particularly as it seems to be a
real drum beat for military intervention in Mali, in Northwest Africa, and
again, ostensibly to combat al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb.
Robles: I
mean they created al-Qaeda, for Christ’s sake!
Rozoff: Yes,
that’s the irony that I think needs to be emphasized, is the fact that while
the US and its NATO allies are actively supporting al-Qaeda and al-Qaeda
-linked foreign fighters and terrorists against governments in Libya and
Syria, and who knows where else tomorrow, they are using the pretext of
fighting al-Qaeda to introduce military forces into Africa, throughout the
continent of Africa indeed. So, I think we can take that at face value, that
this is a charade, this is a pretence.
We should also of course, since we talked about earlier, the fact that the
US has pivoted to the Asia-Pacific region after having subjugated the
greater Middle East, that somebody is playing off an old script, if you
will, when they come up with these sorts of bogus excuses, because that
really belongs to phase 2, if you will, of post-Cold War global US military
expansion. So, they need a new script writer in the State Department and the
Pentagon.
Robles: Regarding?
Rozoff: The
reason why they are increasing military forces in Africa. We know for
example that last year the Obama Administration announced a deployment of
(special operations) special forces troops to four countries in Central
Africa to fight the Lord’s Resistance Army. And they were going to Uganda,
the Central African Republic, Congo, South Sudan. So, in that case it is
clearly not al-Qaeda. The US military forces have been involved in
counter-insurgency operations in Mali for several years and not against
al-Qaeda but against ethnic Tuaregs.
So, they’ll use whatever excuse, I guess is at hand, you know, fighting
pirates in the Horn of Africa, or pirates in the Gulf of Guinea, or the
Lord’s Resistance Army in Central Africa, but at the end of the day, the US
did not setup the US-Africa Command as a social service agency. They set it
up as the scaffolding for increased US military activities in Africa. And
what we’ve seen, with the confirmation of the fact that the Pentagon is
going to deploy new military forces to 35 nations, is that the US is intent
on establishing a permanent military presence throughout the length and
breadth of Africa.
John
Robles
28 January, 12:27
‘There is a drone with Assange’s name on it’ – William Blum
Assange will be assassinated if freed, expert says. In an exclusive
interview with the Voice of Russia, William
Blum,
an American author, historian, and critic of United States foreign policy
spoke about CIA assassinations (one of his areas of expertise) and some of
his past work. Mr. Blum is candid in his assessment of CIA assassination
plots against such people as Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez and Ecuadorian
President Rafael Correa. He also has some surprising things to say about
Julian Assange and Osama Bin Laden.
Robles: Hello
Mr. Blum,nice to be speaking with you.You have a very long and interesting
history… a lot of things you have written. You wrote a book about the CIA.
Can you tell us a little bit about that?
Blum:Well,
American interventions carried out via the CIA and all the U.S. military
have been my specialty for many-many years. My books emphasize those things.
As does my monthly newsletters “The Anti-Empire Report”.
As far as the backlash: the U.S. government doesn’t bother American authors
that much, because they know we don’t have that much influence, they can
afford to have us write things and point to that as proof of freedom of
speech in America. So they don’t care.
Robles: I
see. They said that you had exposed more than 200 CIA employees.
Blum:That
was in 1969 when I was working for the “Underground Press” in Washington
D.C. and I and a colleague we parked our car outside the CIA headquarters in
Virginia and for a couple of hours or so, we recorded the license plate
numbers of all the cars going into the CIA. And with that information we
were able to compile a list of names and addresses of these people, which we
published in our underground newspaper.
Robles: That
sounds very interesting! You talked about CIA assassination plots, you’re
pretty much an expert on that. Can you tell us a little bit about what you
know about the plot to remove Hugo Chavez?
Blum:Assassination
attempts? That was in 2004, the U.S. government met with the coup plotters
both in Venezuela and Washington and these people then carried out a
military coup which overthrew Chavez and the people took him to custody, but
he was freed after about two days, because of a combination of public outcry
and pressure from the remaining members of the military who were not part of
the coup. So then he actually had and still has a lot of support in the
military. He, himself was a member of it. So a combination of the military
and a public outcry forced the coup plotters to abandon their plans and
after two days Chavez was released.
Robles: Can
you tell us about your book “Rogue State: A Guide to the World’s Only
Superpower”? And could you comment on an endorsement you received, at the
time, in 2006 by Osama bin Laden?
Blum:It
was supposed to be a mini-encyclopedia of all the nefarious things done by
the U.S. foreign policy. There’s a chapter on assassination, a chapter on
bombings and so on. There are many chapters covering the gross and illegal
aspects of U.S. foreign policy. It’s compiled together many things which
most Americans, and most people in the world are not aware of.
Individual elements of each of these compilations one could find in some
public area or other but to put it together into long tables of information
was my contribution and that came out in about 2000. And then in 2006 the
Arabic version of the book, the book had many foreign translations, there
were two in Arabic and one of those two was read by Osama bin Laden and he,
in one of his periodic audio recordings, mentioned that Americans would be
well served if they read my book and get a better understanding of their
enemy.
And I can only guess that the theme in that book Rogue State which most
caught his attention and his sympathy was one chapter dealing with the
motivations of anti-American terrorists. Contrary to what we were being
taught, and still now to a large extent, were that these people were: just
hated America, or they hated Christianity, or they were just crazy, or they
were just envious of democracy and our wealth, all of these reasons, but
never even a hint that they were acting out of retribution for the decades
of very serious military and other infringements upon people in the Middle
East. All kinds of bombings and overthrows of governments, supporting
dictatorships, supporting Israel,all kinds of things I gave a long list of
the American actions which created all these anti-American terrorists, and
that is what I am assuming most appealed to Bin Laden.
Robles: What
do you know about the assassination plot to kill Ecuadorian President Rafael
Correa? Before the elections, he is supposed to be assassinated.
Blum:This
month you are speaking about?
Robles: Yes sir. Correa made this statement that they had uncovered a plot
to assassinate him before...
Blum:I
wouldn’t doubt that. I would be surprised if the CIA did not attempt to
assassinate him. I mean among other reasons, he’s sheltering Assange! That
by itself is reason to assassinate him.
Robles: Are
you saying that just the fact that he’s given asylum to Assange, that’s
enough for the CIA to assassinate him?
Blum:The
CIA attempts to assassinate people for much less reasons than that. Assange
is the public enemy №1 in America. The U.S. is obsessed with him and they
are afraid that he will be issuing the realease of more classified documents
so they’d really like to put him out of the way, if they can.
They were all set to invade the Ecuadorian Embassy in London, when the
British government was finally talked out of it by their own people: That it
would set a terrible precedent, that the U.K. Embassies all over the world
would not be safe then. That was the reason that they called off the
invasion plan.
They’re very serious about Assange. I mean he has to go. He’s the most
marked man in the world.
Robles: You
think so? You said he’s enemy number one of the United States.
Blum: As
far as being put out of the way? Yeah. I would say that if the US had a
choice it would get him out of the way before anyone else.
Robles: So
you think it’s pretty credible his fears of being assassinated by the CIA?
Yeah?
Blum:There
is a drone somewhere with his name on it, and if he walks around in the
world and he is not in the midst of a big city, he’s a marked man. There’s a
rocket with his name on it inside of a drone with his name on it. So I can
not imagine that would not be the case. The CIA has, if you delve as much as
I have into the history of assassinations and so on, that is totally
expected.
Robles: So
as an expert you are saying that it is totally expected?! Wow! Okay
Blum: If
he’s walking around free somewhere. Yeah.
Robles: Sure.
I see. I see. Hey Bill thank you very much! I really appreciate you speaking
with me!
William Blum is the author of several books on US foreign policy. He also
sends out a monthly newsletter called “The Anti-Empire Report”
24 January, 17:57
Taking apart and rebuilding government policy is hacktivism – interview
Photo: EPA
Craig Rouskey, micro-biologist, citizen scientist and organizer with Occupy
San Francisco spoke about his move from activism into Hacktivism and
explained some of the principles involved in Hacktivism and why it may be
more effective in the changing world.
Robles: You
decided to move away a little bit from the Occupy activism and into
Hacktivism. What are some of the reasons for your decision to do that? And
is that a sign that the Occupy Movement is in decline?
Rouskey: No,
I would say first a couple of things. First, the Occupy Movement is still
going pretty strong. We still have a huge number of people participating in
a housing justice and other issues. I myself, I’m still continuing the
on-the-ground activism in the community with a group which is a rights
focused group where we are working on local community issues in San
Francisco, in the community. So, there’s been a lot of spin-out groups of
the Occupy that are focused on specific communities.
Robles: A
little bit about the Hacktivism,Now you are moving a little bit away from
the normal activism into Hacktivism. In your opinion, what are some of the
ways you can be more effective in that arena? And are you afraid of the
severe consequences that Hacktivists face even for doing simple things like
a DDoS attack?
Rouskey: I
want to be very clear about some things. First of all, Hacktivism is an
iterative concept, it changes whatever iteration. In its first iteration,
Hacktivism was a lot of computer work, where people were breaking into
systems to liberate information, which I think is a noble goal. I think it
is important that information that people paid for up front, especially like
scientific research, I believe that that should be liberated.
I think everyone should have access to that, especially the tax payer. We
paid for that information and that research up front and we should have
access to it downstream. With that said, the kind of Hacktivism I do, is
actually taking apart systems, whether that’s actual physical tools or
whatever, and rebuilding them in ways that are more advantageous for people.
So, some of the Hacktivism that I would consider Hacktivism is the
evaluation of public policy, breaking down public policy and reforming it in
a way that is actually useful and more advantageous to the community. So, it
is not all computer work. I’m horrible at coding, I could never be like a
computer hacker.
Robles: I
think a Hacktivist can just be someone who has a blog and speaks out and
gets information out to people, I mean… I think I agree with you there are
different levels. You don’t have to be a cracker or a hacker to be a
Hacktivist.
Rouskey: Right,
exactly! I would say that the general principles of Hacktivism or the people
who call themselves Hacktivists generally focus on freeing up information. I
think they believe that having access to information or the tools to acquire
information is a goal that we have been working towards.
I would also say that there is a general theme of decentralization which was
also a main theme in the Occupy Movement, and it remains a central theme in
the Occupy Movement.
And I think the other important thing is that there is like a lack of
hierarchy among hacktivists. It is not about your degree, it is not about
your age, your sex but anarchist decentralized principle to it, which I
think is beautiful and important.
Robles: Craig,
thanks a lot. I really appreciate it.
23 January, 21:44
Foreign child adoption as sound “investment” and business for Americans, or
why Dima Yakovlev Law is necessary to protect Russian children
© Photo: «Вести.Ru»
As the media and the public debate the Dima Yakovlev Law the real reasons
for the law are being lost in the debate, namely the abuse of Russian
adoptees by American adoptive parents and the fact that American officials
are not allowing Russian officials access to children who are Russian
citizens in order to verify that they are being cared for in an appropriate
manner. Russia seeks to protect its most defenseless citizens, it is as
simple as that.
With the passing of the Dima Yakovlev law many Russians are debating the
issue of adoptions and sadly another rift, albeit small has appeared in
Russian society due to America’s actions. What is being lost in the debate
here in Russia as sides point fingers at each other, namely the Western
backed “opposition” who come out on every occasion to belittle any decision
are action that protects Russia’s sovereignty and those who are interested
in the well being of Russian children, is the real reason for the Dima
Yakovlev law: the deaths and murders of Russian adoptees at the hands of
their American foster parents.
Pseudo political correctness western style and Russian orphans
Many have said the law was in answer to the U.S. Magnitsky Act, however this
is far from the case. The real reason was the continued abuse of Russian
adoptees by American adoptive parents and the obfuscation and interference
by the US authorities in granting Russian Officials access to Russian
adoptees in order to check their well-being. It is important to recall that
all Russian adoptees are Russian citizens until their 18th birthday and
Russia is simply seeking to protect the rights of its smallest and most
defenseless citizens.
Why Americans adopt foreign children
To start off I think it is important to look at why Americans want to adopt
Russian children in the first place. One reason is because they did not have
to go through the extensive background checks and even the US checks that
exist are more lenient when it comes foreign adoptions.
Another and perhaps more significant reason is the simple fact that most
American adoptive parents are white and many openly state of their dream to
have a blonde blue-eyed white child, problematic in the US where parents may
have only children from other race groups to choose from or where the
competition for the child of their choice is too great or the wait could
take years.
“Parents” such as these are not interested in charity or providing a child
with a good life but are in reality simply engaged in the act of “buying
goods” to fulfill whatever motivations they have for pursuing the “purchase”
in the first place.
The argument they may use that a white child is easier to integrate into a
white family may seem valid on the surface but true familial harmony has
nothing to do with racial make-up, unless you are a racist of course.
For adoptions agencies and child “brokers” engaged in the business of
selling and buying children for their clients, having a source of cheap
white children was a “God-send”. Like anything where there is a demand there
is always someone ready to capitalize on that demand and fill it, and for
them Russia was ideal.
One “Christian” organization in Russia openly states that the cost of a
Russian child was $5,000, almost nothing when Americans are ready to pay
from $35,000 to $120,000 for a white blue-eyed child. The profits to be had
are huge.
Of course it is distasteful to call the process what it is; “the buying and
selling of children”, especially for the parents, so the agencies and those
involved have to come up with mountains of supportive arguments and
self-satisfying reasoning to make their business palatable to the world at
large.
The constant propaganda against Russia and the “deplorable conditions in
Russian orphanages”, etc etc ad-nauseum by people who have never set foot in
a Russian orphanage or even in the Russian Federation is necessary to assist
them in selling their product and placating the consciences of people who
are uprooting a child from the child’s natural surrounding and attempting to
recreate the child in whatever image they desire on the other side of the
planet.
Another reason Americans seek to adopt children from overseas is the fear
that the birth mother may show up and “interfere” in the upbringing of the
child or take the child away altogether, something which may happen in the
US if for example; a mother had her child taken away due to substance abuse
issues and has since reformed her behavior.
All of these reasons; the long waiting lists, the stricter internal US
controls, the fact that the birth mother may show up at any moment, the fact
that the child itself may seek out its mother or father, make adopting
children from a foreign country attractive to Americans. There are also
issues with parents who may have an affinity for a country or possess
imperialistic sentiments assuaged by the fact that they “possess” a person
from a certain country and can make them “American”.
Another fact that few pay attention to but is also important is the tax
breaks that Americans may receive for adopting foreign children, there is
the primary tax break for having a dependent child (applicable to all
adoptions) and then tax breaks for foreign travel and “charitable
contributions” if the adoption is done for example through a “Christian”
organization. Again, from a “business” viewpoint a very sound “investment”,
and from an oversight viewpoint such organizations enjoy almost no oversight
by the authorities.
Unfortunately no serious studies on the subject have been done and data is
extremely difficult to find as to the primary driving motivations so what
you have just read are the results of my own research on the matter at hand.
Adoptions and adoptees in the US
Most of the information about adoptions in the US is almost impossible to
find and even the number of actual children eligible for adoption is a fact
that is not available to the public. As an example; in one state an adoptive
parent, who went through all of the steps to be allowed to adopt a child and
was finally allowed to “choose” a child, was shocked to learn that apart
from the 30 children she was at first told were available, there were in
fact more than 500 more in her state.
According to official data; in the US the figures regarding international as
opposed to internal adoptions stands at roughly 20% international and 40%
from the foster care system and 40% from private adoptions.
Currently there are officially about 129,000 children in the US in the
foster care system ready for adoption and the number from private adoptions
may be far greater bringing the number of children in the US waiting to be
adopted to what could be close to half a million or more, this does not
include children who the states are waiting to take parental rights away
from.
The US does not officially list children as being eligible for adoption
until the parents have lost all parental rights and states intentionally
refrain from taking this final step until there are adoptive parents, making
the number of children eligible for adoption but not on official lists
possibly ten times greater.
Child homicide and abuse in the US: stats and figures
In 2008, a year I was able to find data on, there were approximately 1,494
child homicides in the United States. Of those killed 1,035 were male, while
453 were female, these figures are more or less average with reports seeing
an increase in the past few years.
Indeed, even the 19 Russian-born children who died while in the care of
their adoptive parents are a tiny minority of the 60,000 Russian children
who have been adopted in the United States since 1991. Using this number,
the death rate of Russian adoptees is 1.5 per 100,000 per year. By
comparison, the general child fatality rate due to neglect and abuse has
hovered around 2.2 deaths per 100,000 children per year over the past few
years in the US. One might argue from the facts that Americans kill more of
their own children than Russian children, but the point is moot when even
one death is unacceptable.
Some more figures: in the US in 2011 an estimated 1,570 children died of
abuse and neglect, making the numbers: 2.1 per 100,000, and in the past 6
years the number has fluctuated between a high of 1,608 in 2007 and a low of
1,494 in 2008.
By age the number of children killed in the US is disproportionately high
when it comes to children under 3. In 2011: 98 3-year-olds were murdered,
166 2-year-olds, 229 1-year-olds and 534 children under the age of one were
murdered by their caregivers, making almost 82% of all murdered children in
America under the age of 4.
According to US Government statistics for 2011 the race of parents who
murdered their children is as follows: 490 children were killed by white
parents (40.5%), 341 by black parents (28.2%) and 215 by Hispanic parents
(17.8%), figures from which any number of conclusions could be reached.
The figures for those killed by neglect stand at 895 deaths (71.1%), from
abuse 602 dead (47.9%) with the rest dying from other causes.
An argument in defense of adoptive parents might be had from the fact that
there were 617,858 cases of abuse reported by parents in 2011 and by
adoptive parents only 5,108. This could be attributed to the fact that
adoptive parents are generally better educated and more well-off than the
majority of the population.
How do Americans abuse their children? According to US Government figures
for 2011 61% of parents abusing their children were guilty of neglect, 9.7%
physically abused their children and a whopping 6.2% sexually abused their
own children or those in their care.
Crime and Punishment
Sadly, in a country where rapists get an average of 65 months in prison
before they are prowling the streets again (according to figures by the
FBI), hackers get approximately 10 years for DDoS attacks, and anyone the
state deems a “terrorist” can be disappeared for life, parents who murder
their own children, and in particular those who murder Russian orphans, get
away with nothing more than a slap on the wrist if they are repentant.
Moral low-ground
The United States has long ago lost its self-perceived position as the
world’s moral compass for many reasons, one being the situation surrounding
adopted children, others being all of the war crimes, aggressive wars,
droning, torture and human rights violations that have existed and come to
light since 9-11.
Yet another no less important indicator is the Official US refusal to sign
and comply with international treaties and norms including: the Convention
on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW), the
Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC), the Convention for the
Protection of all Persons from Enforced Disappearance, the Mine Ban Treaty,
the Convention on Cluster Munitions, the Convention on the Rights of Persons
with Disabilities (CRPD) and the Optional Protocol to the Convention against
Torture.
The US is the only country in the world, other than Somalia, that has not
ratified the Convention on the Rights of the Child, the most widely and
rapidly ratified human rights treaty in history. As for the CEDAW, it is one
of only seven countries including: Iran, Nauru, Palau, Somalia, Sudan and
Tonga that has failed to ratify the convention.
One might argue that the US has ratified the Hague Conventions on
International Adoptions, however there is no recourse for violations to the
conventions and they are largely ignored.
Despite all of the above many Americans feel that, while dictating to the
world what to do and meddling into the affairs of any nation they choose to,
any “foreign” oversight or monitoring is somehow an attack on their
sovereignty. Hence the obfuscation faced by Russian Officials when it comes
to checking on the welfare of Russian adoptees.
US Society
As I said before: having lived in both Russia and the U.S. for decades I can
honestly say that any Russian travelling to the U.S. would be shocked at the
number of stories and cases of child abuse and atrocities against children
that exist in the United States and that no one hears about in the filtered
international U.S. media.
Societal violence, sexual deviation and the mentality of Americans in seeing
every country in the world as being beneath their own contempt make it
dangerous for children from other countries to be adopted by Americans.
Predators see isolated foreign children as prime targets as they are
defenseless and in most cases too afraid to fight back or speak out, which
leads to an escalation of the violence against themselves.
For decades few people have understood the reality that in America it is not
all milk and honey, yet Russians are beginning to wake up. The Russian
Government in particular, with the expulsion of USAID, which was heavily
involved in subverting the Russian state, and also in the whole children’s
care sphere, has finally begun to take measures against the carefully
planned and subtle encroachment on Russia’s sovereignty.
Russians must congratulate the government and President Putin for having the
courage and foresight to take measures to protect the Russian Federation and
the Russian people and most importantly protect Russia’s defenseless
children who were being “sold” to America. Unfortunately after decades of
pro-US propaganda many in Russia still believe the lies they have been fed
and unfortunately do not know the real motives behind organizations such
USAID.
With higher education almost out of reach for the majority of Americans the
overall population is one of the worst educated in the world. The societal
glorification of violence and force is exacerbated by lack of education,
resulting in a situation where many see violence as the only solution,
including when it comes to resolving issues with children.
America’s own problems concerning unwanted children are also not helped and
possibly driven by the church and the whole anti-abortion craze which has
caused millions of unwanted children that no one really cares about
adopting.
Economic concerns and the breakdown down in the family, the primary societal
unit, also have led to a situation where children are paying the price in
America.
Despite all of this the US Media is continuously biased against Russia, and
any other country in the world for that matter, and continues to perpetuate
the myth that most Americans themselves refuse to part with, that America is
the land of milk and honey and everywhere else is “third world”.
Russian falacies
One of these myths is the argument by the Russian opposition that disabled
Russian orphans have nowhere to go. According to the Pavel Astakhov, the
Russian President’s Ombudsman on Children’s Rights, there are more Russian
parents ready to adopt Russian orphans than there are children.
There are also hundreds of thousands of disabled American children for
Americans to adopt and if there were really charitable motivations behind
the actions of these adoptive parents, they would adopt their own disabled
children first, but they don’t. Americans who want to adopt Russian
children, as I said above, are not interested in charity, they are
interested in obtaining a cheap white blue-eyed Russian baby.
I can not say there are no Americans who are driven by charity, there are
some and they must be applauded, but they are few and generally they are
overburdened and run group homes which attempt to deal with the needs of
these special children in an environment where there is minimal support.
As for Russia and I can say this honestly and with the insight of an
educator, the respect for children is much higher than in the U.S. and the
level of crimes and cases of inhumane acts against children are so much
lower as to almost be non-existent if one compares them to the U.S.
In the better part of two decades here there have been less than a dozen
high profile cases of crimes against children and once again I cannot help
but to compare that with the almost daily onslaught in the U.S. media of
cases of child abuse, kidnappings, child murders and pedophilia.
Not only Russia
Russia is not the only country that has put a halt to American adoptions.
One important source for children used by those in the child trade business
was Guatemala. In 2008 it was the leading country providing children for
Americans with 4,123 children being adopted by Americans. Several countries
have also drastically cut back on the number of adoptions to America or
increased the requirements on those wishing to adopt, these include:
Ethiopia, Vietnam, South Korea and even China.
Murdered Children
Since the ‘90s 19 Russian children have died at the hands of their American
adopted parents.
1. Ivan Skorobogatov “Nathaniel Craver” aged 7, died August 25, 2009 after
being taken off life support in Hershey Pennsylvania. The autopsy revealed
Vanya suffered 80 external injuries, including 20 to the head and had been
abused for an extended period of time. His killers Michael and Nannette
Craver were released after time served.
2. Dmitry Yakovlev, “Chase Harrison” aged 21 months, died July 8, 2008 in
Herndon, Virginia. Child was baked alive in the back of the car of adopted
“father” Miles Harrison, who “forgot” the child and was acquitted of any
wrongdoing in the murder of the infant. His killer was released.
3. Nickolai (Kolya ) Emelyantsev, 14-months-old, died on March 7, 2008 in
Tooele Utah. He was murdered by his adoptive mother Kimberly Emelyantsev, he
died of a fractured skull after being repeatedly bashed on a concrete floor
and had cuts and bruises to over 90% percent of his little body. His killer
has already been released.
4. Denis Uritsky “Dennis Gene Merryman” 8-years-old. Died January 22, 2005
in Harford County, Maryland of cardiac arrest brought on by starvation. At 3
he weighed 40 pounds, at the time of death he weighed 37. His killers were
released then received 22 years each.
5. Victoria Bazhenova “Nina Hilt”. 2.5-years-old. Died July 2, 2005 in
Manassas, Virginia of blows and internal injuries to the abdominal area
after being repeatedly kick and punched in the stomach and back. Murdered by
Peggy Sue Hilt. Killer sentenced to approximately 20 years.
6. Konstantin Shlepin “David Polreis Jr” aged 2. Died February 9, 1996 in
Greeley, Colorado after being beaten to death. Had cuts and bruises over 90%
of his body. Killed by Renee Polreis. Killer was released in 2005.
7. Logan Higginbotham aged 3. Died November 25, 1998 in Shelburne, Vermont
of massive head injuries after being slammed into a wall. Killer Laura
Higginbotham was sentenced to 1 year and has been released.
8. Viktor Sergeivich Tulimov “Viktor Matthey” aged 6. Died October 31, 2000
in Hunterdon County, New Jersey of hypothermia after being locked in an
unheated service room overnight. Had over 40 cuts and bruises on his body as
well as untreated bone fractures. Killers Robert and Brenda Matthey were
released in 2008.
9. Luke Evans aged 1.5 years. Died November 30, 2001 in Lowell, Indiana of
massive head injuries and shaken baby syndrome. His killer Natalie Fabian
Evans was found not guilty and released.
10. Alexei Vasilovich Geiko “Alex Pavlis” 6-years-old. Died December 18,
2003 in Schaumburg, Illinois of massive injuries after going into a coma.
His killer Iram Pavlis was sentenced to 12 years in prison but was released
in 2008.
11. Ilya Kargyntsev “Isaac Jonathan Dykstra” aged 21 months. Died August 14,
2005 in Iowa City, Iowa of massive internal injuries. Killer Brian Dykstra
was charged with 2nd degree murder then acquitted. Free 12. Jacob Lindroff
aged 5. Died December 14, 2001 in Gloucester Township, New Jersey of a blunt
force trauma to the head. Jacob has 2nd degree burns on his feet. Killers
James and Heather Lindroff have been released. They were later charged with
conspiracy to commit murder after attempting to hire a someone to kill a
witness in the case. They are free after those charges as well.
13. Jessica Albina Hagmann age 2 years 7 months. Died August 11, 2003 in
Prince William County, Virginia of mechanical asphyxia due to compression
against an adult: lack of blood and oxygen. Jessica weighed only 27 pounds
when she died and was covered with bruises including multiple bruises and
cuts to her face and head. Killer Patrice Lynn Hagmann received 2 suspended
sentences and has been released.
14. Dmitry Sergeyevich Ishlankulov “Liam Dmitry Thompson” aged 3. Died
October 16, 2003 in Columbus, Ohio of burns to his entire body after being
boiled alive in a bathtub in 140 degree water and placed in a crib in a
freezing basement for five days. Killers Gary Allen Thompson received 15
years. Will probably be released in 2018. Killer Amy Thompson will be
released in 2017.
15. Maria Anastasia Bennett aged 2. Died October 23, 2002 in Columbus Ohio
of fatal head wounds and eye injuries. Her killer Susan Jane Bennett
received 3 years with release after 2 years and the probation. She has been
released.
16. Sacha Vallée aged 4. Died October 9, 2002 in Verdun, Quebec, Canada
after being beaten for 4 days, dropped on his face, punched in the stomach
and left outside in the Canadian winter. His killer Eric Grenier was found
guilty of non-premeditated homicide and sentenced to life in prison with no
possiblility of parole for 12 years( by Canada).
17. Nikita Khoryakovont “Zachary Higier” aged 2. Died August 15, 2002 in
Braintree, Massachusetts of a bilateral skull fracture, a massive stroke on
the right side of his brain, a smaller stroke on left side, brain swelling
and detached retinas consistent with a fall from a 3 storey building. Killer
Natalia Higier was sentenced to 2 1/2 years. Has been released
18 and19 Yana and Anatoly Kolenda. Both aged 11. Died on October 21, 2002 in
Westfield, Massachusetts after being brutally murdered by the Richard
Kolenda who then killed the adoptive mother and later shot himself in the
head.
Then there are multiple cases of abuse such as:
Kuzma Cochran, 4-years-old. Abused by Jane and Timothy Cochran. Kuzma was
tortured, had bruises over 90% of his body, was beaten and had a piece of
his ear cut off. Abusers received 3 and 2 months. Were released.
Kelsey Hyre, aged 2, living in Akron Ohio and permanently paralyzed on
September 26, 2002 when her spine severed by Gerald Hyre after he slammed
her on the floor.
Russian
children should be cared for and looked after by Russian parents or
caregivers, especially in light of the lack of access allowed Russian
Officials to Russian children abroad, in reality that is in the best
interest of the children. As for America they should take more steps to
solve their own internal issues with regards to child abuse and child
homicide before dragging in the international community and asking it to
accept the atrocious conditions faced by adoptees in America. In short
America should be banned from all international adoptions until they can
take care of their own children. 21 January, 11:55
Under the Radar-3: RFID chips being used to track students and US and
al-Qaeda working hand in hand
The surveillance of Americans by their government continues unabated, the US
was in Mali long before the French arrived supposedly working with al-Qaeda,
and Germany is withdrawing its gold reserves worldwide. All of these events
are currently taking place “Under the Radar”.
Every week hundreds of important events occur that are important to all of
us but which do not get enough media attention, either because they are
over-shadowed by other major news or because they do not fit the pre-planned
message that many of the world’s media are trying to promote, there is a
journalistic responsibility to tell the whole story which we always attempt
to do. Although we keep our eyes on the world this week’s most pressing
issues that have been suppressed come from the US.
1. FBI
and secret surveillance techniques
Have you hear of an IMSI catcher or Stingray? Neither did I until I read
this story. The device is being used by the FBI and is basically a fake cell
phone tower that is used to determine the location of all cells phones in a
certain area and intercept all phone calls and texts. It is just one of the
US FBI’s new tools to spy on you and one they do not want you to know about.
“Currently, EFF is suing the government for its secret interpretation of the
Patriot Act Section 215, and for secret FISA court opinions that could shed
light on the NSA warrantless wiretapping program. In addition, the ACLU has
sued the Obama administration for its legal opinion stating it can kill US
citizens overseas, away from the battlefield.”
Electronic Frontier Foundation
2. Maybe it is not surprising anymore that the US
and al-Qaeda are working hand in hand to spread war and terror
and keep the endless global “war on Terror” alive, but it may be a little
known fact that they were operating in Mali when the Tuareg took over the
country.
“… there was already a US presence in Mali in the summer of 2012. What they
were doing there remains a mystery, as it is a mystery if the ever
co-present flip flops on the ground were there inciting the perpetual
scapegoat Al Qaeda to do this, or that. Or maybe it was not the CIA. Maybe
it was the Army's "little-known and secretive" branch known as the
Intelligence and Security Command.”
3. Germany
has recently pulled all of its gold from the Federal Reserve Bank of
New York and is in the process of testing all of its gold worldwide. Why?
This articles claims that “they” now have a TEMPEST style device that can
locate and analyze gold emanations.
“News that Germany will remove 300 tons of gold from the Federal Reserve
Bank of New York gold vault repeats the oft-made claim the vault is 80 feet
below ground."
4. MOSSAD
agents rarely get caught but when they do it should not be
ignored, especially when they are hand-picked
and trained from prisoners held at Guantanamo.
“For the first time in history, an Israeli agent of Pakistani origin has
been arrested from Lahore, who is reportedly from the Seraiki belt region.
Sources have revealed that the culprit was held at Guantanamo Bay for two
and a half years, during the course of which he was subjected to
brainwashing. After that, he was sent to Afghanistan where he was specially
trained to plan terrorism. And finally, he was sent back to Pakistan.”
5. Well Americans, you were warned and you allowed it to happen. Now if you
protest what your government does or do anything that appears to be aimed at
“coercing” the populace in any way, you may be labeled a terrorist and
secretly arrested and disappeared.
“A written exam administered by the Pentagon labels “protests” as a form of
“low-level terrorism” —
enraging civil liberties advocates and activist groups who say it shows
blatant disregard of the First Amendment.”
6. The fact that American
students are now being required to wear RFID tracking devices like
cattle is something I wrote about before but the fact that the state is able
to win the right to do such a thing in court is something that should be
making the headlines worldwide.
“Hernandez, who has been threatened with expulsion for refusing to wear a
chipless RFID tracking badge, had her request for a preliminary injunction
denied by the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals and the Western District of
Texas.”
7. Riding
your bike and arguing with a police officer are crimes in California.
This has been going on for decades but the idiocy of it has as far as I know
never been filmed until now.
“As a result of the man ‘arguing’ with him, the criminal in uniform insists
on adding a made up charge for ‘speeding’ to add on top of the made up
charge of biking on the wrong side of a bike path.”
8. Right
wing propaganda tool called out for calling Americans “stupid”
US media watchdog, Media Matters for America calls out fearmongering gasbag
Bill O’Reilly as he insults ALL Americans and calls them “stupid”.
“So, I have to play Paul Revere here. I have to continue to tell you the
truth. But I also believe many Americans simply will not listen. And even
worse, they are not smart enough -- not smart enough to even care. Disaster
could be coming.”
9. The
death of Aaron Swartz is something the mass media may not want
you to know about, especially as many are claiming his death was
a murder disguised as a suicide. If you are interested in some of
the writings of Mr. Swartz please visit Cryptome which is keeping a large
archive of Mr. Swartz’s writings and work.
10. Al-Qaeda,
created, funded and backed by the US is expanding their role in Syria and
the Syrians they claim to be fighting for are not happy. Surprise, surprise!
"They see stealing things that used to belong to the government, like copper
factories, or any factory, as no problem," said the rebel commander. "They
are selling it to the Turks and using the money for themselves. This is
wrong. This is money for the people."
The state demanding support for gay marriage - interview
Download audio file
John
Robles
Homosexual practice is a rejection of the way God has made one - interview
Download audio file
With the subject of single sex marriages being debated worldwide and the
voices of those in the United States who are against it almost unheard,
Voice of Russia correspondent John Robles decided to seek out the opinion
and reasoning from the opposing side on the issue. Dr. Robert Gagnon,
represents a theological view and presents arguments against such "unions"
and states that in the current political climate in North America anyone who
opposes the institution of marriage including homosexuals faces the danger
of losing their jobs or being sued if they speak out.
16 January, 11:32
Clinton's language has no place in international diplomacy - interview
Collage "The Voice of Russia"
The owner of Stop NATO, Rick Rozoff, recently spoke to the Voice of Russia
about NATO's global plans and Russian-US relations. In part 2 of our
interview Mr. Rozoff states that the US has been intentionally baiting and
insulting Russia as it enroaches on Russia geopolitical space, he says that
it is only the diplomatic maturity and the sense of responsibility of the
Russian Government that has prevented the situation from becoming a far
worse crisis.
You took part in a debate. Can you remind our listeners about that?
Yes. NATO planning committee in Chicago, under the pressure from the ad hoc
coalition that was protesting the NATO Summit and other forces, agreed to
have a televised debate between the two NATO spokespeople and two people
taking the opposite position, that is, people in opposition to the world’s
first global military bloc. And initially this was to have included two
fairly high-ranking NATO officials who were subsequently pulled and that was
cancelled. Subsequent to that, the plan was to bring on the NATO side two
former US Ambassadors to NATO and that plan was scrapped.
So, eventually two university professors in Chicago with some military
background were brought on to defend the NATO position and two of us – a
woman who had been a veteran US marine, or a veteran of the Iraq war and
myself put forward the anti-NATO position. But because the resources
available to the people who sponsored this think tank in Chicago, it was not
only televised globally on YouTube but lengthy extracts have appeared on
Chicago television. So, for the first time ever I suppose, at least here in
the US, the anti-NATO forces were given an opportunity to air their
grievances against the bloc.
Has there been any blowback?
Yes, in fact even at the time an ire of intimidation and fear-mongering was
intentionally pushed by the city administration, and I’m sure the White
House is behind it. The very day of the demonstration, for example, the two
daily newspapers had banner headlines announcing a terrorist plot in
Chicago. That is, that five people had been arrested ostensibly for planning
pipe bombs or Molotov cocktails or something of the sort. But the case has
really gone no place. But it was enough to intimidate people.
I personally spoke to people at the demonstration and to people I work with
who, in both cases, stated that friends or relatives of theirs had intended
to come to the demonstration but were scared off by this fact. There was an
effort made to intimidate the people and to keep them away from anti-NATO
activities. Nevertheless, there was a respectable showing in the march. It
included people like the Reverend Jesse Jackson, who was at the front of the
march, but it also included several dozen young US former service members
who had fought in the Iraq and Afghan wars.
The Russian-US working group, the NATO group recently met. Where did you see
Russian-NATO-US relations going? Was it worse than you thought or better?
Let’s say no better, no worse. But it is surely no progress. We know for
example, there is now a new Russian representative in the NATO-Russia
Council who has replaced his predecessor. That format is still active. It
had not been, of course, for a long period of time after Georgia's invasion
of South Ossetia in August of 2008 and the fact that the US and NATO both
immediately afterwards set up special cooperation formats with Georgia to
all but award it for its aggression and to pledge continued support to the
Saakashvili regime and Tbilisi, as well to modernize its so called defenses,
which is in many cases offensive military capabilities.
What we have seen is that the US and NATO still resolutely refuse Russian
offers to provide legal guarantees for the interceptor missile system in
Eastern Europe. They have sabotaged and effectively destroyed the Russian
offer to setup sectoral defense where Russia would have interceptor missiles
covering a certain swath of land and then it would be picked up by NATO and
the US. So, at every turn the US and NATO are spurning Russian offers to
cooperate on a genuine defense system and forging ahead with the unilateral
system that, in its initial deployments, will be on countries either
bordering Russia or comparatively close to it. You know, Poland and Romania
in the first place.
But we do have to recollect that the very same PAC-3 missiles that are
heading to Turkey were deployed to eastern Poland in May of 2010, a battery
was stationed there and which remains there, which is only in estimated 40
miles from the Russian territory, from the Kaliningrad District. So, I think
it is irreputable, what’s happening is that the US and NATO are encroaching
upon Russian geopolitical space and essentially taunting Russia. And every
effort made by Russia to extend offers of cooperation and so forth are
essentially being refused.
What’s your opinion on where Russia-US relations are going?
In many ways the US attitude towards the Russian Federation is even more
abrasive and dismissive than the US attitude and behaviors towards the
Soviet Union during the Cold War and I think that’s an incontestable fact.
With the recent passage of the so called Magnitsky Bill in the US, what
we’re seeing – is almost gratuitous efforts to belittle or demean or insult
Russia and whenever Russia attempts to take any countermeasures they are
accused of.
This is slightly off the point, but I mean it gives you an indication of
where the things are going, when Russia, Kazakhstan and Belarus tried to
setup a customs union, we had the Secretary of State Hilary Clinton warning
about the resovietization the former Soviet space. That’s a brash and almost
lunatic claim, but this is what passes muster in today’s world. And the US
feels that – well, they can make accusations like that, so contemptuous are
they, of Russia, and I would add of the rest of the world for that matter,
but we are talking about Russia.
And this follows on heels of now I guess the former US Ambassador to the UN
Susan Rice and Hilary Clinton herself over the past years using words like
“despicable” and so forth in relation to Russian actions, particularly in
the UN. And I’m old enough to remember the Cold War, and I frankly do not
remember leading US diplomats using that kind of language in relation to the
Soviet Union, the sort of language we are now hearing.
I don’t remember anything like that myself.
But this is a sort of imperial hubris that accompanies some nation that’s
reached the same sort of delusions of grandeur that an individual afflicted
with bipolar disorder might. “Being the world’s military superpower”, and
that quote is from President Barack Obama, - “they are allowed to engage in
any kind of swagger they choose to and that they can insult one of the major
nations in the world – Russia, and one more over whose military capacities
are the only ones that seriously rival the US”. So, to insult and provoke,
and Russia the way it is doing – it is only the diplomatic maturity and the
sense of responsibility of the Russian Government that’s prevented this from
flaring up and becoming a far worse crisis.
But
one wonders when the next provocation is going to occur. The next time
Russia is going to be accused of resovietazing the former Soviet space, the
next time they are going to be called “despicable” or “shameful”? Such
language has no role whatsoever in international diplomacy and really casts
a very dark mark on the ruling elite in the US. 15 January, 21:27
Every move you make, we’ll be watching you
© Photo: en.wikipedia.org
30,000 drones flying over the United States in the next 20 years is just one
of the things Americans have to look forward too as their government
continues to turn their country into a 100% total security state. Americans
have long ago traded their “freedom” for security, so drones over Kansas
should be no real big deal. The US Government and even the local sheriff are
counting on your support, and support you will because you have no choice.
According to the US Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) within 20 years
there will be approximately 30,000 drones flying over the United States.
This month alone the FAA approved the usage of another 348 drones to be used
within the United States.
The latest drone-hungry law enforcement body in the US to publically declare
they will be using drones is the Sherriff’s Department of Orange County
Florida, which has stated it intends to use 2 drones this summer over the
metropolitan Orlando area. LINK 1
Proponents of drone usage are attempting to justify yet another intrusion
into the privacy of Americans and another tool that will strip away personal
freedom and assist in creating a 100% secure-total-control-hyper-security
state, by saying they will be used to catch illegal immigrants, criminals,
and you guessed it terrorists.
The problem here is that most Americans are buying into these false flag
hyped-up arguments based on media-spin and false propaganda being spread by
their own government.
Saying that some poor Mexican (or other illegal) who picks their tomatoes,
lives in a room with seven other illegals during the picking season only to
be deported before he can be paid when the farmer who hired him turns him in
to the Immigration and Naturalization Service because, lo’ and behold,
unbeknownst to him they were illegal, is a threat to America’s national
security, is the most disingenuous xenophobic argument one can possibly
imagine.
People conveniently forget that illegal-immigrants are exploited to no end
in the United States and then blamed for every problem under the sun. They
also forget that without them the price for most fruits and vegetables, for
example, would sky-rocket beyond affordability if union-wage paid hands were
sent out to the fields to pick the harvests. But of course for the US
Government it is easy to blame marginalized and vulnerable members of the
population for any problem they wish.
As for criminals, the US for-profit-prison-system is holding more prisoners
than other country on earth and the US also has a larger percentage of the
population in prison than any other country on the planet.
Does a country that can put a person in prison for life for stealing a Mars
bar on three occasions (California’s 3 strikes law) really need to be able
to spy on anyone anytime they want? And that is assuming the drones will be
used for surveillance. The next step will be arming them, again in the name
of security to facilitate arrests and stop criminals.
Does the US law enforcement establishment need to be this militarized? The
answer is no. Do they wish to be? The answer is they absolutely and without
a do.
What about the terrorist claim? Well, to be frank the entire US terrorist
threat is pure hype. Unless of course we take into account the self-created
terrorist threat that has existed since 9-11. However even after more than a
decade of slaughtering supposed “terrorists” their families and everyone
around them, perhaps in the hope of creating real terrorists and thousands
who will seek revenge for the killing of their families, there has yet to be
a real terrorist attack in the United States of America.
So there you go American populace, you have been duped and the real planners
of 9-11 have been rolling over and laughing at you since day one. Here you
were asked to believe that some ex-CIA agent (Osama bin-Laden a.k.a. Tom
Ossman) organized the most precision demolition in the history of mankind
and staged it to look like a terrorist attack using pilotless “drone”
aircraft from a cave in Afghanistan, and you believed it. Then you were
asked to believe that behind every tree and lamp-post there lurked an
al-Qaeda terrorist from the local “cell” that exists in every “hometown”
American city, and you believed that too.
So they stripped you of one right after the other and you agreed because you
felt afraid and terrorized and trusted your government, yet who in fact was
terrorizing you? Your own government and your
government-and-corporate-controlled-mass-media, who have worked hand in hand
in creating the corporate-controlled fascist state you live in today.
So Americans, you have video cameras on every corner, you have bar codes and
computers that record your purchases and upload them to your “file” when you
use your credit card, you have dentists who record and upload your data to
central data-bases, you have AGPS devices with internet connect-ability that
record your every move and can now even determine what floor you are on,
cell phones that can be used remotely to listen and even watch you through
the camera and which can track your every move, you have traffic cams that
record your license number and can ticket you by mail, laser radar that can
record your speed from three miles out, auto-mounted transmitters that can
help track your vehicle no matter where you might be, satellite cams that
can read the title of that paperback you are reading while you try to fall
asleep, cameras that can see through walls, acoustic, microwave and other
weapons that can cook you alive from the inside from a distance, data-bases
of your every move from a doctor’s visit to a late electrical bill, facial
identification software being used in public places, retinal scans, brain
scanning devices that can supposedly pick up the “abnormal” brain activity
of a terrorist, and that is not all. They want to put RFID chips under your
skin with all of your information stored on them that can be activated
remotely, they already have RFID chips used to track consumer goods and cars
and even students (Texas), warrantless wire tapping and surveillance to
listen to every word you say and to watch you whenever they want, you have
data bases that record all your activities on the internet and Carnivore
which saves and records every e-mail and fax you send, there are even tiny
micro-chips in your money which record every bank where that money has been,
and then there are the lists: the black lists, no-fly lists, watch lists,
secret police lists which might contain such information as the fact that
you keep a shot gun under the bed in the right corner, etc. etc., so with
all that America what is a drone?
If you were to enter the “secret” DHS or CIA or NSA rooms where there are
huge screens that they use to track and record everything and anything they
want and can bring you up with a few key-strokes and see where you are and
what you have been up to, including what you had for dinner last night, you
would understand that you are no longer free.
I personally don’t feel too bad for Americans, they have blindly allowed all
of this to come about and unfortunately for them it is too late.
Meanwhile, is Russia we have traffic cams, registration stamps with our
addresses, and very competent security services who actually prevent real
terrorists from attacking. Without demanding the enslavement of the people.
The views and opinions expressed here are my own. I may be reached at jar2@list.ru
13 January, 19:42
Orwellian methods of US cyber control: DDoS and the Greensboro sit-ins,
Anonymous comment
© Flickr.com/evaryont/cc-by-nc-sa 3.0
When there is tyranny free people must fight back, when the tyrants try to
take away that right, they must be removed. The United States of America is
attempting to implement and exercise tyranny on the world-wide-web, this is
evidenced by unproportionate fines and prison sentences for anything they
deem they do not like. Cyber space should be free space not a prison
planet. Anonymous
commented on DDoS and the Greensboro sit-ins to the Voice of Russia.
The recent petition by supporters of Anonymous to the Obama Administration
to decriminalize DDoS attacks has now received 3,649 signatures, as of time
of writing.
One of my sources in Anonymous contacted me with some interesting facts that
show the ridiculous over kill possessed by the US authorities. If you are
not convinced that ten year felony sentences for a temporary slowdown of a
location in cyber-space which then remains undamaged is over-kill perhaps
these facts will change your mind.
According to my anonymous source: “The severity of the sentences the
government seeks for those who have participated in denial of service
protests are dangerously out of line with the harm caused.”
The source says that according
to the US’ own data rapists
serve on average 65 months in prison, yet the government seeks sentences of
ten years, 120 months, for the nonviolent act of participating in a denial
of serviceprotest.
Liking DDoS in the virtual world to denial of service in the real world is
an astute argument but in reality the virtual kind is so much less tangible
and in reality does not even exist in the real world that it should not even
need to be compared, let alone prosecuted.
One might argue if the people do not have the right to protest and freely
express themselves in cyber space, then the government which is supposed to
be of the people has absolutely no business attempting to regulate it or
control it.
Attempting to control the masses and information with such Orwellian methods
and such an iron-hand is nothing if not complete and total tyranny on the
part of the US Government and the out of control police state.
The source goes on to say: “Denial of service actions have been instrumental
in the pursuit and protection of civil rights in America. Recall that the
touchstone moment of the 1960s Civil Rights Movement was the Greensboro
sit-in where
isolated and vulnerable blacks occupied the "whites-only" lunch counter at
Woolworth's.The protest spanned days, rather than the hours typical of a
DDoS protest, and the Woolworth's lunch business was blocked entirely, while
sales dropped by more than a third. Yet for all of this disruption,
protesters were largely unmolested by the police. In fact, the police even
protected a protester by arresting an angry assailant! Ultimately,
Woolworth's changed their policy of segregation to end the protest, allowing
blacks and whites to enjoy equal treatment.”
Comparing the Civil Rights Movement to cyber sit-ins may be a little bit of
a stretch but the question here is the methodology to bring about peaceful
change. Again to contrast, the Greensboro sit-ins required dozens if not
hundreds of people putting their lives on the line and risking real world
blowback. So logically the penalty should be more severe than doing
something in cyber space. Again DDoS attacks do not damage and just slow
things down for a while. So why is the US so heavy-handed on cyber
activists?
Our source says: “Yet in recent times, the story does not end so happily.
When Paypal, Visa, and Mastercard blocked and confiscated donations intended
for Wikileaks, protesters flooded the companies' sites to demand that
Wikileaks receive the same service that all other customers enjoy. So much
internet traffic was generated by protesters that, effectively, all of the
seats at the lunch counters of these financial companies were occupied,
temporarily closing their websites. Within hours rather than weeks, the
protesters dispersed peacefully and normal operations resumed for Paypal,
Visa, and Mastercard.”
The US government is desperate to control the internet and terrify anyone
who attempts to exercise any sort of freedom on it, just like they attempt
to stifle the freedom of speech in the real world, for several reasons. The
main reason being their own criminal conduct and the fact that the internet
has done more to show the evil and illegality of government and corrupt
officials than anything else in the history of mankind, another secondary
but nonetheless important reason is the financial motivations of the
corporations which not control the Fascist States of America.
The source said: “Today's powerful federal police, however, no longer
exercise the restraint shown by the local police of 1960s. In the following
two months, the FBI
served more than 40 warrants and
released the famous press statement calling for 10-year felony sentences for
all involved.”
In reality DDoS attacks are a temporary headache and when addressing
legitimate complaints they should not be prosecuted at all. Prosecuting
personal or damaging material, launching personal cyber attacks or cracking
into systems and defacing or stealing information is another topic entirely.
For the out of control police state however prosecuting DDoS attacks in such
a heavy handed way is just another way to make the for-profit-prison-system
more profitable, terrorize anyone with a dissenting view into silence and
protect the government’s corporate controllers.
Source finished with the following statement: “Anonymous stands by the
example of the brave men and women of Greensboro. History shows that the
bravery of protesters results in a more just society for all, and the public
interest is not served by 10-year sentences for peaceful resistance.”
The public interest is not, but the corporate and police state’s interests
are. If the people no longer have the right to protest, then they are slaves
of the system, and that is exactly what those in power in America want.
13 January, 16:40
Mubarak retrial ordered amid spreading unrest in Egypt
Photo: EPA
A judge in Cairo has granted an appeal by former Egyptian President Hosni
Mubarak and the defense and ordered a retrial in the case which found
Mubarak sentenced Mubarak to life in prison for not preventing the deaths of
900 protestors during last year’s Arab Spring uprising. In a related
development Mubarak’s sons who were found not guilty on corruption charges
in the same trial, will also be re-tried. "The retrial will be based on the
same evidence used in the previous trial. No new evidence will be added to
the case."
In a short hearing in a court in Egypt, judge Ahmed Ali Abdel-Rahman, has
ordered a retrial in the case of 84-year-old former Egyptian President Hosni
Mubarak, who is currently serving a life sentence for not preventing the
killing of approximately 900 protestors during the Arab Spring uprising in
2011.
The decision by the court also applies to Mubarak’s former security head,
Habib al Adli, who was tried along with Mubarak and also sentenced to life
in prison on the same charges.
The decision by the court came in response to an appeal request that was
earlier filed by Mubarak and the defendants in the case.
Reports say that there will be no new evidence presented at the re-trial for
which a date has not been currently sent. Sky news quotes Mohamed Abdel
Razek, a lawyer for Mubarak as saying: "The retrial will be based on the
same evidence used in the previous trial. No new evidence will be added to
the case."
Sky news also quotes the lawyer as saying the panel of judges will take into
consideration Mubarak’s deteriorating health when reaching their new
decision.
Mubarak’s health has steadily deteriorated since he was overthrown, even
being pronounced dead at one point by the state news agency when he went
into a coma following a stroke he had while in custody.
Mubarak is currently in a Cairo hospital after he apparently slipped and
injured himself while in prison recently.
The ruling comes amid intensified protests and violence in the country and a
day after a public funds prosecutor filed another detention warrant against
Mubarak in connection with gifts Mubarak and other officials received during
Mubarak’s time in power. The prosecutors allege Mubarak and other officials
received gifts worth hundreds of thousands of dollars from one of Egypt’s
most influential news organizations.
On the other side of the equation: Mubarak’s two sons, Gamal who was seen as
the successor to Mubarak and Alaa a businessman, who were both acquitted of
corruption charges in the same trail as Mubarak, will be retried. On Sunday
Judge Abdel Rahman granted a prosecution appeal against the not-guilty
verdicts of the two sons.
As Mubarak supporters were cheering the decision in the court, the streets
of Cairo were erupting with new violence.
On Saturday Radical Islamists attacked the offices of the Newspaper of the
opposition Wafd Party as the country was voting on a new constitution which
is hoped will heal the wounds in the country and bring an end to the unrest.
Polls closed at 11pm on Saturday and as officials began the process of
vote-counting the Islamists attacked the offices of the publication. The
results of the national referendum will not be announced until a second
round of voting is complete in other areas of Egypt next Saturday but both
sides are claiming victory and battling each other in the streets.
Protestors against the new constitution say it is too “Islamist” and
discriminates against minorities. In particular it does not guarantee the
rights of minority members of thy Egyptian population or of women.
Protestors who had been staging an “Occupy style” sit-in outside of the
presidential palace in Cairo, complete with tents, where they have been
camping since December 4, 2012, were attacked by unknown assailants with
approximately 30 receiving varying degrees of injuries.
Itar-Tass reports that 27 people were injured in total including 7 members
of the security forces who were present at the site of the protest.
The attackers, who numbered approximately two dozen and wore masks, are
assumed to be Islamic extremist elements with some reports saying they are
connected to the Muslim Brotherhood. They attacked the protestors with
Molotov cocktails and burned down at least for tents.
In a similar attack on December 5, 2012 ten protestors were killed at the
same location. Supporters of current Egyptian President Morsi were blamed
for that attack.
Egypt court orders Mubarak retrial
Egypt's Court of Cassation on Sunday accepted an appeal for a retrial by
former president Hosni Mubarak who was sentenced to life for his involvement
in the deaths of protesters in 2011.
Mubarak, his two sons Alaa and Gamal, his former interior minister and top
security chiefs will now face a new trial, the court said after a very brief
hearing.
The former leader was convicted and sentenced to life behind bars in June
for failing to prevent the killing of some 900 protesters during the 2011
uprising. He spent nearly a month in hospital having fallen unconscious
shortly after his transfer to prison, with state media declaring him
clinically dead on arrival. But medical sources said he appeared to have
suffered a temporary coma.
Since then, there were numerous scares connected with the ex-leader’s
health. The last time Mubarak was taken to hospital was in mid-December.
Voice of Russia, AFP, RT, AP
Mubarak better stay in hospital: lawyer
Former Egypt’s President Hosni Mubarak should stay in a military hospital
where he was transferred after a recent fall, his lawyer Farid El Deeb told
reporters Friday.
Doctors found fractures in Mubarak’s ribs.
"I have warned many times that the prison hospital conditions are not
suitable," he said.
The 84-year-old is serving a life sentence in a Cairo prison for his role in
the deaths of protesters during last year's uprising.
Egypt's ex-Presdent hospitalized
Egypt's ousted president Hosni Mubarak was moved to an army hospital on
Thursday after falling in prison, sparking fresh concerns about his fragile
health.
Mubarak, 84, is serving a life sentence for his role in killing protesters
during last year’s uprising.
Mubarak's health has been the subject of intense speculation in Egypt and he
has spent much of the time before and after his trial in the prison
hospital.
His lawyer said he was transferred to the military hospital after fracturing
a rib in the fall in his prison clinic.
He said Mubarak also suffered from lung complications and dizziness.
11 January, 22:13
“Anonymous” petitions Obama to decriminalize DDos attacks
Photo: EPA
The Anonymous hactivist group, or someone posing as a member of the group,
recently posted a petition on the US White House web-site attempting to
gather signatures to force Obama to consider making DDoS attacks a legal
form of protest. Although Obama himself signs off on an illegal
extra-judicial “kill list” everyday, there is to be no mercy for hacktivists
and no such petition will be allowed to stand, or will it? Read on…
The hacktivist group Anonymous, or someone claiming to be associated with
them named Dylan K., has taken the unusual step of petitioning the Obama
Administration to make Distributed Denial of Service Attacks (DDoS) legal.
At the time of writing the petition has gathered 2,043 signatures but there
have been reports that it
was taken downas
was supposedly the
Anonymous Twitter feed.
Whether taken over by the government or generously reinstated is up to
debate.
The number of signatures required for the matter to be taken up by Obama is
25,000, which have to be collected by February 6th, 2013. However even if
they required number is reached there is no guarantee Obama will do anything
to fulfill the wishes of the petitioners.
A YouTube.ru post is
still active but
has broken links to another Twitter feed and the White House petition.
Whether Anonymous intended the move to be a serious one or not, the fact
that the petition has not been taken down, despite the U.S. Government’s
stance on hactivism and Anonymous, is surprising if not commendable.
Anonymous is hoping to make the legalization of DDoS attacks retroactive so
that the slate would be cleaned, so to speak, something we have seen the US
Government do very often in the past decade or so, with water-boarding,
torture, warrantless wiretapping, Guantanamo, secret arrests, rendition,
unauthorized aggressive wars, extra-judicial executions, droning and Obama’s
daily kill list, to name a few, but alas it may not be meant to be.
A government that brands information activists, hacktivists, Occupiers,
whistle-blowers and others as “terrorists” and “enemies of the state” is
very unlikely to allow anyone other than themselves to have the benefit of
the doubt.
Anonymous, hacktivists and many others, share the thinking that a DDoS
attack is the equivalent of a sit in, only it takes place in cyber-space.
The following message was posted by Anonymous on several forums and someone
has been nice enough to provide the audio. Unfortunately I doubt Obama will
even consider such a petition.
"Greetings Obama and fellow Americans,
This is Anonymous. At the time this message was sent to you, Distributed
Denial of Service Attacks (DDoS) are illegal. This is not hacking, it's the
equivalent of hitting the refresh button on a webpage, which every one of us
has done at least one time in life. Should we be sent to jail if we push
that button a thousand times a second? No! When we start this kind of attack
it's just the same as a sit-in. If we "refresh" a thousand times a second it
will slow down the website, which is a type of protest or a sit-in at work.
Both of those are completely legal. The only difference is that we are doing
it on the internet, at home, at school, at a coffee shop or at a library.
Why are people protesting? They do it because they want to see changes,
positive ones.
We Anonymous, are calling upon not only fellow anonymous. We are calling on
Americans to rise up for the change. There is a petition on the White House
website asking President Obama to make denial of service attacks a legal way
of protesting, release and clear all criminal records of those who have been
jailed for DDoS attacks. Remember, when president Obama was first elected he
wanted change. So does Anonymous.
We Are Anonymous
In a fair world the virtual sit-ins would not be prosecuted, after all they
do no real harm, but the US Government is at war with anyone who threatens
their secrecy. We have seen this with Jeremy Hammond who is facing life in
prison for the Stratfor e-mail release, Julian Assange who has been declared
a terrorist and enemy of the state and many other hacktivists who are wanted
or doing serious prison time for DDoS attacks and other forms of cyber
“hactivities.”
Anonymous, or those posting the “petition,” are hoping that by legalizing
the DDoS attacks the criminal records of past offenders would also be wiped
clean but alas I seriously doubt that will happen.
As Anonymous is a highly decentralized and anonymous organization, pinning
down the petitioner “Dylan K.” is impossible as is ascertaining the
seriousness with which the petition will be received. One might note that
the White House petition site has been used for some strange things recently
and its credibility may be suffering for it.
Some argue that a sit in or demonstration is not the same as a DDoS attack
as they involve thousands of people and a DDoS attack could be carried out
by one sick individual who has a bone to pick or aXe to grind, but
regardless, the DDoS attack may have no real tangible effect, except for
whatever exists in cyber space.
Certain Anonymous members said that no one really knows who filed the
petition and it was perhaps a single Anon, or a small group, pretending to
speak for the group as has happened many times in the past. Anonymous or
not, the petition, a legitimate way to seek justice and make positive change
is not to be allowed to stand by an administration that treasures
escalation, shuns “change we can believe in” and wishes to brand anything
and anyone it can an “enemy-of-the-state.”
On another note, since the petition site of the White House requires the
giving of personal information and the creation of an account, the whole
thing may be just another fishing expedition by federal authorities trying
to collect names of individuals sympathetic to Anonymous, something that may
be stopping the petition from going viral. We don’t know and the White House
has not returned our requests for comment.
The
views and opinions expressed here are my own. I can be reached at
jar2@list.ru. The statement and audio were provided by Anonymous, maybe.
10 January, 18:54
Who was behind PKK assassination in Paris?
Photo: AFP
As peace talks got under way between the Kurdistan Workers Party (Parti
Karkerani Kurdistan or PKK) and the Turkish Government three women
associated with the PKK including a co-founder were found assassinated in
Paris France. The heinous crime is currently being investigated but there is
speculation, mostly from the Turkish side that the executions have to do
with the fact the PKK and the Turkish authorities have begun peace talks to
end the decades old conflict.
Sakine Cansiz a female co-founder of the Kurdistan Workers Party (Parti
Karkerani Kurdistan or PKK) militant group and two other women have been
found dead in Paris. All three of the women were shot in the head execution
style with one of the victims also being shot in the stomach.
Other than Cansiz, according to The Firat News Agency, the victims include
Fidan Dogan, a representative of the Brussels based National Congress of
Kurdistan and Leyla Soylemez who is described as a young activist.
Shortly after midnight on Thursday morning, when the women were reportedly
missed, several workers went to the Information Centre of Kurdistan, an
institute located in the 10th district of Paris, near the center of the
city, where the women had last been seen.
According to the website of the institute it is “… an independent,
non-political, secular organization, embracing Kurdish intellectuals and
artists from different horizons as well as Western specialists on Kurdish
Studies.”
When the employees arrived and noticed blood on the locked doors of the
establishment, the workers broke in and discovered the three bodies of the
women who had all been shot in the head.
The Firat News Agency reports that the murder weapon was believed to have
been fitted with a silencer. However did not elaborate on whether it was
found at the scene or not.
Leon Edart, a spokesperson for The Federation of Kurdish Associations in
France (FEYKA) told the French BFM news channel that there were no
surveillance cameras in building where the crime took place.
Currently there are no suspects but Turkish authorities are saying that the
executions were an internal PKK issue. There is speculation, mostly from the
Turkish side, that the executions have to do with the fact the PKK and the
Turkish authorities have begun peace talks to end the decades old conflict.
Recently the Turkish Government began peace talks with imprisoned PKK leader
Abdullah Ocalan, who is being held by the Turkish authorities on the prison
island of Imrali located off the coast from Istanbul.
On Wednesday there were reports in the Turkish media that an agreement had
been reached on a plan to end the conflict which has raged on since 1984 and
has claimed over 40,000 lives.
There are many on all sides to the conflict that are against any kind of a
peace settlement. These include Turkish elements who do not want to see the
Kurds receive any kind of recognition or autonomy and among radical elements
of the PKK itself who do not want to see any concessions made to Ankara and
who believe that any kind of a peace plan will include giving up certain
demands.
Police have so far not announced any leads, theories or suspects. According
to the AFP a police source sated: “The scene [of the crime] could give rise
to the idea that this was an execution, but the investigation will have to
establish the exact circumstances of this incident."
French Interior Minister Manuel Valls who arrived on the scene shortly after
the bodies were discovered said the killings were "intolerable".
“The three women were undoubtedly executed", Valls said.
Valls said the French authorities would get to the bottom of the crime and
that he had come to express his sympathy to the relatives and close friends
of the three murdered women.
It is important to recall that Turkey recently authorized military
incursions into Iran, supposedly for operations where the Turkish Regular
Army is in hot pursuit of PKK militants.
With military build ups by NATO and the US in the region and the constant
search for a pretext to invade Iran and Syria, there are many of those
actors who would also see any kind of peace as detrimental to planned
provocations and optional scenarios which will allow for an invasion of
either Iran or Syria.
According to Reuters Remzi Kartal, a Kurdistan National Congress leader,
said: "This is a political crime, there is no doubt about it. Ocalan and the
Turkish government have started a peace process, they want to engage in
dialogue, but there are parties that are against resolving the Kurdish
question and want to sabotage the peace process."
Kurdish PKK Party co-founder, 2 activists murdered in Paris
A co-founder of the Kurdish Workers Party (PKK) and two female activists
were murdered today in downtown Paris, police report.
PKK’s Sakine Cansiz, Kurdish National Congress Paris representative Fidan
Doğan and a young Kurdish activist, Leyla Söylemez, were found dead late on
Wednesday night by their friends who became concerned after no one picked up
the receiver in the Center’s office.
The women were found outside the Kurdish institute in the French capital.
All the victims appear to have been shot in the head by a gun with a
silencer. Police say the murder took place about 3pm on Wednesday.
Kurdish community has referred to the triple assassination as an
“execution.”
Agence France-Presse quoted an unidentified police official as saying the
circumstances of the killings “could lead to the conclusion that this was an
execution but inquiries will determine the precise nature of this drama.”
Police officials said a murder investigation had been opened. The bodies and
three shell casings were found in a room at the institute. The women were
all said to hold Turkish passports.
French Interior Minister Manuel Valls called the killings "intolerable".
In the meantime, hundreds have taken to the streets of the French capital,
after the Federation of Kurdish Associations in France (Feyka) called for a
demonstration in Paris.
The motive for the shootings is unclear. Some 40,000 people have died in the
25-year conflict between the Turkish state and the PKK.
However, Turkey has recently begun talks with the jailed PKK leader Abdullah
Ocalan, with the aim of persuading the group to disarm.
Paris: 3 Kurdish women shot in head
Three Kurdish women were found killed with a gunshot to the head early
Thursday inside the Kurdish Institute of Paris, a police source said.
The women were found outside the Kurdish institute in the French capital,
and one of the victims’ names has already been disclosed: 32-year-old Fidan
Dogan reportedly worked for the institute.
One of the women was 32-year-old Fidan Dogan who worked in the institute's
information centre, according to its director, Leon Edart.
The identities of the other two women, who were reportedly Kurdish activists
but did not work at the Institute, were not immediately available.
The three were last seen mid-day on Wednesday at the centre, which was found
locked by late afternoon, according to Edart.
Voice of Russia, AFP, RT, FP, BBC
John
Robles
9 January, 20:31
Syria must be defenseless for America
to illegaly invade, Rated:XXX
Photo: EPA
Poised and ready to invade Syria and continue its plans for complete global
military and political domination at any cost, the US is faltering and has
yet to invade Syria. Most likely stopped by the fact that Syrian defenses
are robust enough to effectively deal with the invader's forces and that
Russian troops are on the ground, the US is stuck in a holding pattern. The
next illegal US act of aggressive war is Syria. Coming soon! Rated: XXX.
The West continues to debate what the United States should do in Syria and
the US what options it has to bring about another interventionist invasion
yet is continuing to have problems in bringing about the conditions it needs
to give the green light to military forces staged and waiting to pounce.
The arrogance of those debating the fate of Syria from thousands of miles
away, as if they even have a right to in the first place, is mind boggling.
Who told the United States that they are responsible for deciding the fate
of Syria or the Syrian people? No one. Who told the United States that they
have some right or some mandate under international law to “intervene”
wherever they desire? No one. Yet that is what they are doing.
Some pundits and analysts are saying: Use the Kosovo model, or the Libyan
scenario, or the Afghanistan example, or don’t repeat the mistakes in Iraq.
However each and every one of them is missing the whole point and that being
from Yugoslavia to Iraq, from Afghanistan to Libya, from the Arab Spring to
Syria, US intervention is not wanted or asked for.
The US understands this and knows the real reason it is going after these
countries, that being resources and geo-political plans, yet it can not
openly state such to the world.
Yugoslavia worked because the right propaganda was spread at the right time
and the world was not ready nor did it have reason to believe that the US’
intentions were anything more than what they were publically touting. Since
then every pretext for invading Yugoslavia has been found and proven to have
been false and self-created by the US whose real goal was to carry out the
geo-political redesigning of the Balkans.
It became clear in Yugoslavia and in what has taken place since then in that
region that the United States has one thing in mind when carrying out their
interventionist invasions and that is control of resources and the
advancement of geopolitical ambitions and position.
If anyone doubts look at who they supported and continue to support in
Serbia and in Kosovo, Muslim extremists, drug traffickers and black-market
organ traders. Why? Because the US is able to manipulate and “work” with
these elements, whereas Christian Serbians who lean geopolitically towards
Russia are a bit more difficult to manipulate and bend to the American will.
We can see this same kind of thinking all over the world and in particular
in the Middle East. The United States has no real interest in human rights
or in oppressed peoples, that is a proven given, what it does care about is
resources, ease of manipulation and geo-political clout.
Yugoslavia was a watershed moment for NATO and the US and the more or less
success of the operation emboldened the US to attempt to do more. To launch
a war, reshape part of Europe, devastate a people and do so all on the whim
of a president who wanted to distract the electorate from a sex-scandal,
seemed bold and dangerous, but it more or less worked.
There were doubters and there were detractors and the destruction of
Yugoslavia did not have the broad support that the planners in Washington
had hoped for. So a group of Neo-Conservatives was tasked with studying the
issue of how to bring about the pre-text for a global war of domination.
Those in power were tired of the United Nations and the international
community and even the American electorate always sticking their noses into
everything and asking for reasons and justifications, they wanted
free-reign.
So those Neo-Conservatives, calling themselves the Project for the New
American Century came up with a plan for complete and total world
domination. The only problem as they saw it was that to allow for the
implementation of the plan, after all what they were doing was illegal,
would require a catalyst, and as the called it themselves, “A new Pearl
Harbor!”.
The carefully planned and orchestrated events of 9-11 were the catalyst that
they needed to launch an open ended and endless “War on Terror” that had no
borders and allowed for anyone to become a target. First on the list was the
invasion of Iraq and second Afghanistan, Hussein was the first target
because he had changed all oil trade in Iraq to the Euro the day before the
invasion and the United Nations and International inspectors already knew
that Hussein had no weapons with which to fight back.
Afghanistan was another story but it did not really matter because the
Taliban, like al-Qaeda had always been on the US payroll and wiping out that
little backward country, as the US military planners thought, would be no
problem. That little invasion took place over ten years ago and the US is
still in Afghanistan and has been completely defeated.
Then we have the case of Libya, another country that had agreed to US
inspections for those evil WMDs and had proven it did not possess weapons
and then was invaded after changing its oil trade to the Euro. Libya had
long been on the US wish list of countries to invade but the problem was
that by then the US had pretty much lost of the capital it had gained from
the orchestrated events of 9-11, and people started questioning.
Now we have the Syrian “intervention”, and everything that the United States
now does is being questioned. The world has seen one act of aggressive
invasion after the other carried out by the US and NATO and has quite
frankly had enough.
Why hasn’t the US invaded Syria yet? One reason is you and I. Every false
flag plan they come up with, we are there to expose it. Every false and
sanctimonious move they make to allow them to invade and rape another
country we are there to document. We know they are funding terrorists and
mercenaries and that the Syrian people themselves do not want America.
Lastly Russia is stopping it, by giving the Syrian people what Libya and
Iraq did not have, the tools and the ways and means to defend themselves and
defend their country.
9 January, 12:50
‘NATO is in phase 3 of its global expansion’ – Rozoff
© Colalge "The Voice of Russia"
NATO is engaged in completing phase 3 of its post-Cold War global expansion,
and the global nature of what once was the "North Atlantic" alliance is now
official, says the owner and manager of the Stop NATO website Rick Rozoff in
part one of a 2012 year-end summary interview on the activities of NATO. He
also talks about NATO’s military activity in regards to “partners across the
globe”, a bilateral organization of cooperation which initially consisted of
8 countries, all in the Asia-Pacific region: Iraq, Pakistan, Afghanistan,
Mongolia, Australia, South Korea, New Zealand and Japan.
Hello, this is John Robles, I’m speaking with Mr. Rick Rozoff, he’s the
owner and manager of the Stop NATO website and international mailing list.
Robles: Could
we do a quick review of the events that have been taking place with NATO and
where do you think they’re going?
Rozoff: It’s
been another year of the expansion of the U.S. dominated military block.
That was highlighted, I suppose, by the summit that was held here, in
Chicago, in May of this year, where amongst other things, NATO announced the
fact that it retains its status as a nuclear alliance, meaning it maintains
offensive nuclear weapons in Europe, for use in the European theater and
perhaps in the Middle East.
NATO had also announced in May at the summit that it had achieved initial
operational capability of the so-called European Phased Adaptive Approach
Interceptor Missile System, with the now permanent deployment of interceptor
missile warships in the Mediterranean and a command-and-control center in
Germany. And that’s preparatory, of course, to placing 48 or more land-based
interceptor missiles in Poland and Romania in the upcoming years.
What we see most alarmingly this year, and it’s a theme that needs to be
dwelled on somewhat, is the active expansion of NATO military hardware into,
what, the Secretary General of NATO Anders Fogh Rasmussen repeatedly refers
to as “the alliance’s southeastern border”, meaning Turkey, and southeastern
Turkey at that: where Turkey meets with not only Syria, but with Iran and
Iraq.
At the beginning of this year the U.S. under NATO auspices moved in an
X-Band transportable interceptor missile radar facility to Turkey, and after
the placement of the interceptor missile radar, the U.S. and NATO
consolidated two; what are called Allied Land Command Centers, in Europe,
and had moved them into Turkey into one command.
And, as we know, that within the next week or so, we’re to see the
deployment of Patriot Advanced Capability-3 Interceptor Missile Batteries in
southeastern Turkey along with several hundred U.S., Dutch and German troops
to accompany those.
So what we’re seeing is that NATO is shifting its emphasis towards the
southern-most and eastern-most member of the alliance: Turkey, and is making
a bid to expand its influence and perhaps to engage in active military
operations in the Middle East. So that I think is the most significant
aspect of NATO’s expansion so far this year.
That, in addition to, another development that occurred immediately prior to
and then was officially enshrined during the summit in May, which was the
creation of new non-geographically specific partnership format called
“Partners Across the Globe”, this is the official designation that NATO
knows it by, and it initially consists of 8 countries, all in the broader
Asia-Pacific region, the Middle-East – East Asia: they are Iraq, Pakistan,
Afghanistan, Mongolia, Australia, South Korea, New Zealand and Japan, so
we’re seeing the open manifestation of NATO now as an international military
force.
Reminder
Robles: What
about the expansion into Central and Eastern Asia?
Rozoff: That,
of course, as you know has been under way since 2001 with the invasion of
Afghanistan and currently the United States and NATO still maintain military
facilities, not only in Afghanistan, but in Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan and
Uzbekistan.
The talk is for the U.S. and its NATO allies to eventually withdraw, of
course, from those nations, but I wouldn’t expect to see that happen in the
imminent future and I think their long-term plans are to maintain Pentagon
and NATO military capacities in Central and South Asia, with Afghanistan
being the hub of those operations but, as mentioned with NATO Partnership
for Peace Allies, like Tajikistan, Uzbekistan and Kyrgyzstan, maintaining
some sort of U.S. and NATO presence in the countries. However there was an
intriguing article in China’s People’s Daily that suggested that what we’re
seeing right now with the U.S. pivot or shift to the Asia-Pacific region is
basically Phase 3 of the U.S. global military expansion in the post-Cold War
Era.
The first phase was, of course, the expansion of NATO into Central and
Eastern Europe, where it has now absorbed as “full members”, every single
former Warsaw Pact country outside of the Soviet Union, in addition to, of
course, Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania and two former Yugoslav Republics and
Albania. That was the first phase.
The second phase, what was referred to from 2001 onwards as being the
“greater” or the “broader” Middle East Project: that is where the U.S. in
conjunction with its NATO Allies expanded influence from Northern Africa all
the way to the Chinese border, in nations like Kyrgyzstan and Kazakhstan.
And the third phase then being the only part of the world that hasn’t come
under the boot of the Pentagon: the Asia-Pacific Region, and I think that’s
a pretty astute analysis and I think that three-phase model is a very
accurate one.
Robles: So,
Rick in “your” opinion, what were the main events of NATO during the past
year?
Rozoff: As
mentioned: the fact that they announced that they have initial capability
for their European and Mediterranean based interceptor missile systems,
which is really the opening salvo in creating a global missile shield.
Initially, it will be in Eastern Europe and the eastern Mediterranean, but
it’s expanding already throughout most of the world. That’s probably the
most single significant fact with NATO expansion; is they’re on a new ‘plane
of battle’ if you will.
It’s no longer simply positioning themselves: ground forces or even air
forces. Now they’ve quite openly proclaimed that they’re setting up what is
potentially a first strike: son of ‘Star Wars’ as it is colloquially known,
an interceptor missile system that could potentially impede the ability of a
nation, that has been either targeted or attacked, to launch effective
retaliation because of a series of sea-based and land-based interceptor
missiles. That would have to be the most significant and most dangerous
initiative by NATO this past year.
Robles: What
about the summit in Chicago and all the events related to that?
Rozoff: By
holding a NATO Summit for only the second time in the United States, the
only preceding one was in 1999 in Washington D.C., which marked the 50th
anniversary of the founding of NATO, but to have held that only for the
second time in the United States and then in the very heartland of the
country, in Chicago, rather than in the administrative capital of the
country, Washington: drew a lot of attention to an alliance that many
Americans had either neglected to inform themselves about or had downplayed
the significance of, but when it came to Chicago it forced a lot of people
to take notice of it, and as a result there was a coalescence of peace
forces and other anti-war and anti-intervention forces that gathered in a
series of actions in Chicago, but culminating in, by some accounts 15-20
thousand people, the large anti-NATO protest on the second day of the summit
in Chicago, so it has brought to people’s attention both within the United
States and I think globally, the scope and the potential danger of the
world’s only military alliance.
Closing
8 January, 20:48
Correa was to be assassinated by CIA before elections
Photo: EPA
Ecuadorian President Rafael Correa says that he is being targeted for
assassination by the US Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and judging from
all available information it is almost a given that he is right. The reasons
are many: oil, trade, exploitation of resources, geopolitical ambitions,
military and strategic positioning, foreign policy objectives, regional
alliances and once again that name comes up: Julian Assange. If Correa knows
everything Assange does he is definitely walking around with crosshairs on
his head.
Ecuadorian President Rafael Correa has stated that a plot to assassinate him
has been uncovered and that the timeline calls for him to be killed prior to
the upcoming elections. His assassination is part of a CIA plot to
destabilize the entire region.
Given the long and sordid history of the CIA in Latin America and the almost
countless cases of assassination, regime changes and propping up dictators
throughout Latin America, Correa’s claim is not only believable but also
almost a given when we look at a few of the things he has and has not done
for and against the all powerful US interests.
When I began investigating for this article I was surprised at the number of
witnesses and sources that have disappeared or had “strange” problems
preventing them from getting evidence to the public, but of course that is
not unusual, what is unusual here is the sheer number.
The most egregious “sins” Correa is guilty of are the closing of the US
Manta Military Base and the eviction of all US forces and the subsequent
offering of the base to China and the granting of political asylum to
WikiLeaks co-founder Julian Assange.
For Correa, if he is right, the clock is ticking. Ecuadorians go to the
polls on February 17 less than a month and a half from now. Reportedly his
life will be at greatest risk when campaigning begins and after he registers
to run, on January 15th until the actual election, unless of course Correa
becomes afraid and decides to not run and hides in the shadows, something
which is highly unlikely.
The latest information about a plot to assassinate Correa came from a
Chilean journalist named Patricio Mery Bell who was investigating an alleged
$88-million drug-money-funded CIA plot to destabilize the Ecuadorian
government and the region.
Correa has also become a pain in the neck for the US as he often maintains
the same stance on issues as Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez, currently
battling with a strangely coincidental case of cancer.
Another huge sin by Correa is that, just like Muammar Gaddafi, he has
reduced poverty in his country, increased the standard of living for all
citizens, expanded democracy and while doing all of this has maintained an
independent political and economic stance. Like Libya, Cuba, Iraq before the
invasion and other countries where social democratic and socialist systems
were growing and prospering, Ecuador’s societal model can not be allowed to
stand as it contradicts US propaganda and capitalist interests.
Ecuador is also one of Latin America’s largest oil exporters and rejoined
OPEC in 2007, and like Iraq and Libya is diversifying its trade and hard
currency reserves away from the dollar. Something both Hussein and Gaddafi
did days before their countries were invaded.
So the reasons for the CIA assassinating Correa are many and obvious, if he
can be replaced by a US leaning puppet, the US can exploit Ecuador’s oil,
enable the exploitation of the population by US corporate and business
interests, further undermine other countries and leaders in the region,
expand its influence, regain its lost military position and bases, important
for logistical support for covert missions and illicit trade, and lastly
evict Julian Assange from the Ecuadorian Embassy in London.
7 January, 21:31
Media-bias, Syria and Russia - an Arab spin
© Photo: «Вести.Ru»
Syria and Russia will go to war, the US is not doing enough to funnel
weapons into the area of the Syrian conflict, the US is giving the Russian
Federation assignments, Brahimi and Russia intentionally railroaded their
own peace plan and finally “Washington has always looked for a political
solution… ” These are just some of the false statements that appear in the
world’s press with regard to the Syrian conflict, but having them all in one
place makes one really wonder who is pulling the strings.
What is intentionally being left out by the West in any debate concerning
Syria is the fact that Syria is a sovereign nation and no matter how much
one country might not like the leader of any nation and how badly the
leader’s removal may be desired, it is, for lack of better phraseology
“illegal” to bring about the forceful removal of a leader from the outside
and it is also illegal to extra-judicially execute a head of state.
The continued vilification of Russia due to the position it has maintained
from day one with regards to Syria is so patently transparent and
self-serving that one wonders how dumbed down the writers believe the
readership must be to be buying into it.
A recent article regarding Syria by Abdul Wahab Badrakhan in Al-Arabiya
News reflects
the blatant bias against Russia and Syria and the adage “if you repeat a lie
long enough it becomes true”, but what makes the work in question stand out
other than the Fox News style of repeating mindless talking points, is the
fact that it chides the US for not doing enough and attempts to portray some
sort of conspiracy between Russia and the US.
The Western reaction to a recent speech by Bashsar Assad was
also indicative of the policy that the West is maintaining, namely if
something does not fit into their pre-planned scenario, it has to be
vilified.
The Clinton State Department either did not actually listen to Assad’s
speech or chose to ignore all of the points made by Assad. The statement
released after Assad’s speech is what we have heard all along: "… another
attempt by the regime to cling to power and does nothing to advance the
Syrian people's goal of a political transition… His initiative is detached
from reality, undermines the efforts of Joint Special Representative Lakhdar
Brahimi …” and of course the ever repeated calls for Assad to step down.
Back to the previous article in question by Mr. Badrakhan who would appear
to be a serious expert on Lebanon and the Arab World, writes some things
that seem at odds with reality and like empty talking points when it comes
to Syria. He states that Russia which has promoted a political solution to
the crisis from the beginning and Lakhdar Brahimi deliberately caused such a
solution to fail. He also says that Russia and the US have some sort of
secret agreement, which might be indicative of the real Arab attitude to the
US, which has long believed the Arab World is supportive of their
geopolitical plans for the entire Arab World.
Here are some more talking points from the article:
“The Americans are clear about their willingness to dismantle any situation
that might drag them later into direct intervention.” This statement is so
patently false as to be laughable for anyone who has even briefly followed
US war policies over the last several decades. The US quite frankly, does
the opposite as it has been doing in Syria, perpetually looking for a
pretext to invade.
“The regime got the message that it’s free to use the chemical weapons
within specified geographical limitations…” There is no evidence that Assad
or anyone in the government has ordered or allowed the use of any form of
chemical weapons whatsoever.
“It seems now that the promises of the U.S. to the Syrian opposition, that
it can count on U.S. financial and armed support… were merely words.” Amid
constant reports of mercenaries and western backed foreign fighters in Syria
this statement seems ridiculous. The writer also takes no issue with the
fact that funding an armed opposition to over-throw a government by force is
not in keeping with internationally accepted norms.
“Washington had always looked for a political solution, with an ideal
scenario consisting of keeping the “acceptable” part of the regime and the
immediate departure of Bashar Al-Assad, as it just cannot deal with him”,
another completely false statement and the unbelievable arrogance in saying
“Assad must go because the US “just cannot deal with him” is stunning.
“… the U.S. commissioned the Russians with the assignment, so they can deal
with their favorable regime.” Apparently the writer believes that the
Russian Federation which is one of the few countries in the world with a
robust and independent foreign policy is another lap-dog for the US.
The writer then continues to demonize Russia for attempting to mediate a
peaceful resolution to the crisis by saying things like: “Moscow sends an
invitation to the opposition coalition to visit the Russian city for
dialogue. What dialogue? With who? How will it be discussed? According to
which agenda and upon which conditions?” Maybe he should answer these
questions before demonizing Russia for attempting to hold talks.
And he says:”…. not offering them more than a chair at the negotiation
table…” We are talking about armed insurgents and terrorist groups
attempting to overthrow a legitimate government by force, they should be
grateful that they are allowed a seat.
“In the imminent days, the regime will battle with Russia, which supports
its reliance on Iran’s and Hezbollah’s experience…” I have no idea where he
got such information but Russia and the “regime” have had and continue to
have a normal relationship.
“And while the opposition was waiting to be supplied with advanced weapons…”
The writer contradicts his own statement made above.
If this is the Arab position then what we can see is that they want more
bloodshed and more weapons and money to be flowing into Syria so that the
endless cycle of violence continues. If we take into account the
Sunni-Alawite animosity then the reason for this is understandable, but to
vilify and twist the facts in an already muddled situation, in reality,
helps no one. The opinions and views expressed here are my own, I can be reached at jar2@list.ru
7 January, 18:57
Berezovsky knows something will come out - Smith
Photo: RIA Novosti
Michael John Smith, the last person in history convicted of spying for the
Union of Soviet Socialist Republics in the world, and a former quality
control officer who turned intelligence specialist after his unfair
conviction, spoke to the Voice of Russia about the case of Alexander
Litvinenko and the recent revelations that Litvinenko was working for MI-6
and Spain's secret service. In part 2 Smith gives his views on the
connection between oligarch-on-the-run Boris Berezovsky and Litvinenko.
Hello! This is John Robles, I’m speaking with Michael John Smith. He is the
last person convicted of spying for the Soviet Union in the UK.
Robles: What
about his connections with Chechnya?
Smith: Well,
I believe he came from that part of the world when he was a young man, I
believe. So, he may have had some affinity for that part of the country. The
other thing I was going to say, I mean, looking at the role of the MI-6 in
the world, there was a case in 2004 when two Libyans were abducted and
“rendered”, a polite way of calling it, back to Libya to face torture at the
hands of the Gaddafi regime. One of those people has actually won some
compensation: 2.2 million pounds, which is a lot of money, that was paid by
the British Government because they accept that this man has been rendered
illegally by MI-6.
Robles: Is
that normal for MI-6 to treat people who work for them in such a manner?
Smith: I’m
not saying these people worked, they didn’t actually work for them. But I’m
saying that this is the sort of activity that MI-6 has got up to in the
past. That time, in 2004 if you remember, Tony Blair was trying to get on to
better relationships with the Libyans, and particularly Gaddafi, and he had
that meeting in the tent with him. And that was all over oil, and having
some sort of good relationships with Gaddafi to get access to his market and
his oil, so that’s MI-6 just playing a role. And actually, what happened
there was that the MI-6 head Sir Mark Allen, he sent letters to the Libyan
secret service head. And after the war, if you remember, they’ve found
secret files from the Libyan secret service. So, he sent letters from the
MI-6 to the Libyans and I’m putting it on very good terms but after rendered
these two guys back to Libya for Gaddafi to torture.
Robles: And
where are they now? They’re now in London, or…?
Smith: I
believe one of them has gone back to Libya, I’m not sure but he is lucky
that he is still alive because in those circumstances many people died.
Robles: What
do you make of Litvinenko’s widow? Recently she was making pleas for money
to finance legal fees.
Smith: She
wants the murder investigated and wants to, obviously find out who is
responsible. And we don’t know because it is still under way, this inquest
into the death. Exactly, what is going to come out in the future – it might
be the things in the files which have not been revealed yet, which will
perhaps shed new light on what really happened and whether Litvinenko was
doing some secret mission maybe and got into trouble over that.
We just don’t know, but his wife has a personal interest in this. So, let’s
hope she is not being misled by the British Government into thinking it was
only the Russians who could have been responsible.
Robles: Do
you see any connection between Litvinenko and Berezovsky’s fall from grace
in the UK and the fact that Berezovsky has stopped funding the
investigation? Apparently Litvinenko’s wife was receiving financial support
from Berezovsky.
Smith: As
the inquest proceeds, possibly Berezovsky knows that there is going to be
something coming out in the future that he doesn’t want to be known, and
possibly that may have something to do with why he’s withdrawn his funding.
Robles: Do
you see any connection with… that he lost a case to Abramovich?
Smith: That’s
right, he lost a very big court case a few weeks ago.
Robles: Right.
Right. Pretty much put out to pasture, I would say, by MI-6 and the UK
Government.Would you characterize that correctly?
Smith: Well,
I’m not quite sure what Berezovsky’s involvement with MI-6 is, I mean he is
probably not that close to them. He seems to be a bit of a maverick in the
UK. And he behaves in some ways that he can do what he likes and I don’t
think he is somebody that British Government particularly like having on our
shores.
Robles: How
is it that he was able to obtain “instantly” a British passport when he
arrived in the UK?
Smith: I
guess at that time perhaps he was seen as a useful ally. The fact he had a
lot of money that he could bring to the UK he had lots of investments in
Russia, and possibly they saw him as being a useful asset to them. But I’m
not so sure they see it that way now because he obviously has his own agenda
and it is not necessarily in the best interests of the British people.
Robles: Mike,
last time we talked, we discussed some of the issues regarding the case of
Tomlinson who was supposedly “the leaker” if you will, of the infamous MI-6
list. Have you heard anything or do you know anything about what’s happened
to him?
Smith: It
is very strange I think. We have talked about Tomlinson in the past and he
was on the scene making comments on his blog, he had at least one blog I
think on the Internet. And he was constantly causing trouble for MI-6 and
eventually they sent a team over to search all of his belongings. They took
a lot of stuff back to London including his computer hard disks. And they
gave him a pretty hard time for a few weeks. Then it all went quiet. And I
actually had a few conversations by email with Tomlinson about my own case.
Robles: Me
too.
Smith: And
he seemed very interested and helpful. I didn’t find him at all difficult.
You know, he was quite open about what he knew. And he also got involved in
the inquest into Princess Diana, if you remember…
Robles: Right!
And then he completely disappeared…
Smith: That’s
right. What came up in the newspapers about the time he disappeared was that
he had done some sort of deal with MI-6 and that everything was going to be
good. And whether he got a financial settlement out of it, I don’t know. But
he just seemed to disappear and I’ve not heard any more about him and I’ve
seen no mention of him on any website. And it seems very strange. Whether he
is still alive, it makes us question that, doesn’t it? He is certainly not
somebody whom I’ve seen any comment from in the past year or two.
Robles: Thank
you very much Mike. I really appreciate you speaking with me again.
Smith: Thank
you John, nice to talk to you again.
Robles: Ok,
take care.
You were listening to part 2 of an interview with Michael John Smith, the
last person convicted of spying for the Soviet Union in the world. You can
find part
1 on
our website at english.ruvr.ru.
6 January, 19:55
Reasons for teen crime in America, or of murderous teenagers and torturing
cops
© Flickr.com/ greg westfall./cc-by
Cases of violence and horrific acts carried out by youth who have been
influenced by the internet and computer games continues to grow as the first
generation of children “raised by the net” come of age and are able to turn
their virtual playrooms into real and tangible mayhem. Are they to blame? Or
is the society that raised them to blame?
In Russia there was an old saying that said we must protect and cherish our
children because they are the future. This saying is just as topical today
as it was hundreds of years ago but who is responsible for raising our
children?
Of course the immediate family unit is the primary structure responsible for
raising children, and this is more or less true until the age when the child
is given to a state or other educational facility to begin their education.
The family unit carries the responsibility of shaping the basis for the
future adult. This includes moral values, ethical behavior, sexual
orientation, respect for life and fellow humans, and a host of other areas
that the person then bases their world view and future behavior on.
When economic, moral and other factors, in anyway, cause a disruption in, or
the destruction of, the primary family unit this has a negative effect on
the development of the child, and once that damage is done it is almost
impossible to undo it.
When we look at societal models from around the world with regard to the
support of the primary family unit there are many factors which have to be
taken into account, these include economic, educational, religious, moral
guidance, health care and other kinds of support which most often have to
take place at the local level and be easily accessible to the family unit.
The role of the state and the church in many regards has a huge effect on
the preservation and support of the family unit. If overall society does not
support the family unit or does not provide adequate conditions for it to
thrive then there is a qualitative deterioration in the quality of the
guidance provided to the child who is helpless and totally dependent on
those around him or her.
If we look at the US capitalist model and that of states which seek to
emulate the societal norms and conditions prevalent in that country we see
many complete and utter failings and a dysfunctional state and societal
structure unable to properly carry out the task of properly raising children
who enter its citizenry.
One of the most basic needs of all humans, if not arguably the most basic
need, in particular in a capitalist system, is the need for employment that
is able to allow the individual to support him or herself and support the
family unit.
Employment is of utmost importance in other regards as well in allowing the
individual to realize and fulfill their potential and be a productive and
contributing member of the society where he or she finds themselves and
those factors are no less important, but we are focusing on family.
The failing capitalist system in the US is an example we will look at since
its eventual collapse will have severe consequences around the world.
Almost any American will agree the “American Dream” is dead, buried and
almost forgotten. That dream of having a home, a family and rewarding
education and employment has long ago become out of reach for the larger
part of society.
The American economy is devastated and will never recover, it was hi-jacked
and gutted by a few who continue to profiteer from an endless illegal war
not even allowing the populace the industrial and manufacturing boon that
may be found in a “war economy” as most of the jobs have been outsourced to
third countries and manufacturing profits stay in the hands of an elite few.
The resulting “natural escalation of capitalism” and move into fascism,
where corporations run the state, has meant that the American populace and
in particular the family unit has been devastated.
The primary necessities of the family unit have become almost unattainable,
these include health care, education, housing, transportation and even basic
sustenance. Under such conditions the first and foremost societal structure,
the family unit, has become unsustainable, leading to irreparable damage to
the children dependent on the family. Factors which have destroyed the
family unit include both parents working, inadequate health and dental care,
poor living conditions, poor life conditions and overall poverty.
A state run by corporations where even basic healthcare is the object of
corporate profiteering can not be expected to solve any of these problems,
although it is in the power of the state to do so and one might argue their
most important responsibility. We could thus conclude that a healthy state
and societal model can be determined by simply analyzing the health of the
family unit, for as the old Russian saying goes: children are out future.
In the US the breakdown of the family unit has been coupled with a police
state that has cracked down on all marginalized segments of society
including parents, teens and children. In order to compensate for the
societal breakdown caused by its own destructive self-serving policies the
US state is dealing with the problems through the use of force and
attempting to control the populace with an iron-fist.
One of the results of the breakdown of the family unit and the move to an
information based society is the fact that children and teens who once spent
free time doing homework, playing, reading or even watching endless hours of
mind-numbing television are now spending their time on the internet.
With both parents working, less societal support for youth and advances in
technology this dependence on the internet is a logical transition that has
been promoted and allowed to grow despite warning by educators,
psychologists and analysts as to the harm that could be caused to children.
We are beginning to see the results of such developments. Since the advent
of the internet there has been a qualitative change in the youth of the
world and in their lives. In most cases this has been a change for the
worst.
The fault is not that of the internet but lies in the destruction of the
family unit and the lowering levels of education, lack of supervision and
absence of positive constructive activities for youth. These factors apply
to the US societal model.
If we look at the Japanese model for example, where there is a concerted
societal attempt to keep youth busy in positive productive and socially
acceptable activities we might cite the old adage: idle hands are a devil’s
plaything.
Although I have said the family unit is the most important factor in raising
children, the second most important factor, the societal unit, can not be
ignored. Parents have their role in the early formation and development of
the child but once school starts they are then exposed to the societal
component and this continues for the rest of their lives.
Hence we as members of society teach the children and youth in society what
is acceptable and normal. Any society that does not take that responsibility
seriously does so at its own imminent peril.
In the US this societal factor is largely to blame for the acute rise in
youth crime. This is largely due to the amoral nature of the signals that
yuth receive on a daily basis namely with regard to the continued
glorification of violence, crime, force and sex in the media and in the
things that are marketed for their consumption.
The victims of society are then demonized as the victimizers when they
succumb to hopelessness and an endless diet of violence and go out and
emulate what they see on a daily basis.
Some examples include the autistic youth in Connecticut who recently gunned
down over 20 people was an isolated child who spent most of his time playing
violent computer games.
Recently two teenage girls drugged the parents of one of them so they
could get on the internet after ten pm,
tyhey were hence turned into the police by the very parents who were
supposed to protect and care for them.
Another case has five
teens being arrested for
attempting to steal the shoes of a 13-year-old Chicago boy. Five teens
attempting to steal shoes seems like a pretty grim statement on society to
me.
Then we have the case of the 18 year-old from Astoria Oregon who was so
influenced by Facebook that he posted the fact that he was drunk driving as
a status update and was
arrested.
Apparently he thought he was being cool.
Another poor young man whose life was destroyed by the glorification and
perceived acceptability of guns was an 18 year old who was evicted by his
girlfriend and her new boyfriend and decided to threaten them with a gun, he
is now a felon and will enter the US
for profit prison system before even starting out in life.
There are many reasons for teen crime in America, another is the endless sex
and pornography available to youth, a factor no doubt leading to cases such
as a recent home invasion and rape by a
17-year-old boy near
Seattle and another
in Tulsa.
The response by the authorities only serves to escalate the violence and
rather than attempting to consul and rehabilitate these youth they are
turned into criminals and subjected to more brutality by a merciless system.
Bycops
who torture,
arrest parents for letting kids
play outside,
attempt to make an example of an honor student
working two jobs,
and the list goes on.
Sure some youth may do horrible things, but it is the responsibility of
societal structures that helped to steer them to these deeds that must also
be looked at and reformed and restructured so that such events are not
allowed to happen again. It is also the responsibility of society to stop
allowing the glorification of violence and to demand from those who can
affect change to do so, in a positive direction.
Without our children, we have no future.
The views and opinions expressed here are my own, I can be reached at jar2@list.ru.
5 January, 21:50
Saudi Arabia joins US in drone war, Obama obfuscates
© Photo: en.wikipedia.org
Although the US has not officially declared war on any country, this time
Yemen, drone attacks are on the rise and in Yemen went from eight in 2011 to
53 in 2012. The new US policy of prosecuting their “war on Terror” in now
“kill or kill” as it is inconvenient to deal with “combatants” if they are
captured. In Yemen Saudi Arabia has been pulled in and their air-force is
assisting in attacks within Yemen, and now, it is their “problem”.
The latest reports on the global US drone war again raise the subject to the
forefront and more questions as to the legality of the use of drones.
The Times recently reported that eternal US ally Saudi Arabia is now
assisting the US in “prosecuting
an undeclared aerial war against al-Qaeda in Yemen.”
Saudi Arabia is now providing its fighter jets to assist Washington in
perpetuating its illegal covert drone war in the sovereign territory of
Yemen.
The Times quoted a source in the US Intelligence Community as saying that
"some of the so-called drone missions are actually Saudi Air Force
missions". Saudi Arabia has also not officially declared war on Yemen.
According to the Australian the
new interventionist war by the United States in Yemen is connected with the
illegality and the “legal problems” associated with capturing foreign
nationals and indefinitely detaining them in the illegal prison at
Guantanamo Bay Cuba.
The Times cites an unnamed US official as saying "There is no kill or
capture anymore. It's kill or kill”, meaning the US policy of carrying out
extra-judicial execution and targeted assassinations, even of US citizens,
is apparently justified by the US Government and Barrack Hussein Obama,
because of the “legal problems” involved in actually allowing their targets
due process and Geneva Convention rights.
The Australian reports that Bruce Riedel, an ex-CIA officer stated: "There's
a part of our policy that goes back to Saudi Arabia. We outsource this
problem of Al-Qaeda in the Arab Peninsula (AQAP) to the Saudis, make it
their problem. It is their problem."
The reason that al-Qaeda (created by the US to fight the USSR in
Afghanistan) or more particularly AQAP, has gained force in Yemen is due to
the US’ own meddling in the country and the US instigated Arab-Spring. After
the 2011 uprising AQAP seized expansive territories in the south of Yemen.
Underlining once again the illegality of the “War on Terror” and the highly
illegal nature of the US’ extra-judicial execution program (droning), are
continued attempts by Obama and the US Government to obfuscate and use the
tenet of secrecy to successfully avoid responsibility for the assassinations
and murders that they are carrying out.
Many have been up in arms about the US use of drones since day one yet the
fleet has grown from approximately 40 in 2001 to over 7,000 today. Outspoken
critics have included the United Nations Special Envoy for Extrajudicial
Killings, the ACLU, Amnesty International, dozens of peace groups such as
Code Pink, law scholars and experts from a plethora of disciplines and
institutions, and a list that is too long to list here, yet Obama and the US
Government have not listened and have instead obfuscated, stone-walled and
re-written laws to justify their criminal conduct.
At the heart of the illegality of the use of drones is the fact that the
combatants, if the targets of an illegal war can be called that, have no
chance to face their accusers or surrender, as they would in a normal
battlefield scenario.
A June 2011 report issued by
the Oxford Research Group in London stated, as did Paul Rogers, an Oxford
Research Group consultant and professor at Bradford University's Peace
Studies Department in England, that "Drone users cannot escape a legal
responsibility to expose the human consequences of their attacks”, which I
would argue is exactly what Obama and the US are doing (escaping
responsibility).
In a more recent related ruling United States District Court Judge Colleen
McMahon issued a 75-page ruling declaring that the US Justice Department
does not have a legal obligation to explain the rationale behind killing
Americans with targeted drone strikes. She wrote: "There are indeed
legitimate reasons, historical and legal, to question the legality of
killings unilaterally authorized by the Executive that take place otherwise
than on a 'hot' field of battle".
Her decision was dealing the Obama Administration’s continued rejection of
FOIA requests in particular regarding drone strikes which assassinated
American citizens.
Judge McMahon further stated: "The Alice-in-Wonderland nature of this
pronouncement is not lost on me; but after careful consideration, I find
myself stuck in a paradoxical situation in which I cannot solve a problem
because of contradictory constraints and rules — a veritable Catch-22,” she
writes.
She continued: “I can find no way around the thicket of laws and precedents
that effectively allow the Executive Branch of our Government to proclaim as
perfectly lawful certain actions that seem on their face incompatible with
our Constitution and laws, while keeping the reason for their conclusion a
secret.”
Regardless of whether drones are a “legal” instrument on the battlefield
under the rules of war or whether extra-judicial executions and daily kill
lists being used to carry them out are offenses that demand immediate
international sanctions and prosecution, the US and Barrack Hussein Obama
will continue to use them and expand their drone programs.
We do not have to be enslaved to the idea that we are helpless as humans to
do anything against the US in their drone war. There are steps that can be
taken. For one, and this is a question for scientists to take up, we can
develop the means and the electronic counter-measures to render drones
useless.
What has been lost on many is that simple electronic noise and
electromagnetic interference can render a drone useless. All that has to be
done is disconnect the electronic link they have with their command centers,
if the US will continue to ignore international law and continue to engage
in illegal extra-judicial executions. Today it may be a “terrorist” and
everyone around him in the middle of nowhere, tomorrow it may be the head of
state of an “unfriendly” country.
The views and opinions expressed here are my own. I can be reached at jar2@list.ru.
4 January, 16:51
Israel supporting al-Qaeda terrorists - Asafari
Photo: EPA
In a little publicized statement Mohammad Hassan Asafari, a Member of the
Iranian Parliament's National Security and Foreign Policy Commission,
blasted Israel and the United States for supporting and providing
intelligence to terrorists groups who are destroying the countries in the
region. The fact that the West is arming and supporting al-Qaeda terrorists
should be setting off alarms, but sadly no one is listening.
Last Tuesday a Member of the Iranian Parliament's National Security and
Foreign Policy Commission Mohammad Hassan Asafari blasted the West for
supporting terrorists and providing them with training and operational
intelligence support. He
stated that
such support has turned countries in the region, such as Syria, into what
can be described as war zones, namely the scenes of military clashes.
Mr. Asafari blames Israel for allowing terrorists to use the country as a
base of operations and for providing them with intelligence that is being
used to launch attacks: "The Zionist regime,” he says, “has become the
largest training base for active terrorists in the Middle-East region and
the footprint of this sinister regime can be easily traced in recent
terrorist operations." With regards to Syria the official stated that
al-Qaeda’s presence in Syria and their terrorist activities there are
evidence of their close relationship to the United States.
Asafari stated that thousands (not hundreds but thousands) of terrorists
with links to al-Qaeda have recently entered Syria from Saudi Arabia, Libya,
Jordan and other countries to wage war against the Syrian Government. He
also states that they are receiving intelligence support from Israel.
Mr. Asafari’s statements have of course gotten extremely little if any press
attention by the West but they should be setting off alarms.
We know that al-Qaeda was created by the CIA to help them fight their war
against the Soviet Union in Afghanistan that is an open secret. What should
be alarming, especially in light of the events of 9-11, a crime no one has
been punished for yet, is that while continuing to wage an illegitimate war
against “terror” (a methodology) the West continues to fund, support, train,
arm and even provide intelligence to the very al-Qaeda terrorist
organization, and those linked to it, that they claim was responsible for
9-11.
The American people have given up so many of their liberties and freedoms
and have been bankrupted by their government until the end of time in the
fight against terrorists who are lurking behind every light post, that any
hint that what should be rogue elements in their government are in bed with
the very terrorists that apparently want to destroy America, should be
causing the people to take to the streets demanding answers. Will they? Not
possible.
In the name of terror, thanks to al-Qaeda, the US “security” apparatus is so
brutal and ever present that apart from an all out revolt, the American
people are powerless to do anything. In the name of security the majority of
Americans have become slaves to a “government” that was supposed to be of
the people by the people and for the people.
The US Government is no longer there to serve the people, the people are
there to serve the government. Call it fascism, enslavement, a police state
what have you, that is the reality. What can you do about it? In reality,
like I said, nothing. It is too late.
9-11 was the catalyst the Project for a New American Century needed to crack
on down on liberties and launch their endless war of global domination,
there is no way they are going to give up on that now, not after it has been
raging on for more than a decade. If the so-called black operations
community in the US actually trained al-Qaeda terrorists to be able to carry
out the most precision demolition in the history of mankind and have been
funding and cooperating with them ever since, there is nothing any of us can
do.
On January 1st four Saudi and Kuwaiti terrorists were killed on the
outskirts of Damascus, and that is just a drop in the pan. The Syrian
Regular Army has captured everything from al-Qaeda terrorists to insurgents
with British accents, to Turkish high-level officers, to Libyan
“freedom-fighters” and everything in between. Even a recent report by the
United Nations states that extremists from 29 countries have infiltrated
Syria to fight
against the Government of Damascus.
The fact that the U.S. is using funding and arming al-Qaeda terrorists
should also set off alarm bells in Israel because if the US is willing to
fund and arm the very same terrorists who supposedly carried out 9-11, what
would stop them from stabbing Israel in the back in the pursuit of their
military and geopolitical goals?
The views and opinions expressed here are the writer’s own. I can be reached
at jar2@list.ru
John
Robles
3 January, 20:58
Depardieu is a friend - Putin
Photo: AFP
As part of France's austerity measures an attempt was made to introduce a
75% tax on the richest French citizens. One target of this tax was famous
French actor Gerard Depardieu who was then embroiled in a row with the
French authorities. In the end Depardieu renounced his French citizenship
and was granted Russian citizenship by President Putin. Is this the
beginning of a mass-migration of wealthy Europeans to Russia?
The President of the Russian Federation Vladimir Putin has granted Russian
citizenship to French actor Gerard Xavier Depardieu under Article 89 of the
Russian Constitution according to a brief statement issued on the Official
Site of the President of Russia.
Under Article 89, point (a) of the Constitution of the Russian Federation
the President of the Russian Federation has the right to grant citizenship
and political asylum to Russian nationals, foreign citizens and stateless
individuals.
Further powers and more specific laws defining the president’s authority
come under a November 28, 1991 “Federal Law On Citizenship of the Russian
Federation", amended by the Judiciary on the 17th of June 1993 and a Federal
Law dated February 6th 1995. Article 33 of the Act defines the specific
powers of the President and states that the President decides on: granting
Russian citizenship to foreign nationals, citizens of the former Soviet
Union and stateless persons. The President also decides on the restoration
of Russian citizenship, the revocation of citizenship, permission to have
dual citizenship and the issuing of honorary citizenship. The President
exercises these powers by issuing Presidential Decrees.
Presidential spokesperson Dmitry Peskov has stated that the decision by
President Putin to grant Mr. Depardieu Russian Citizenship was due to his
substantial contributions to the development of Russian culture and cinema.
Mr. Peskov stated that Depardieu played in a number of very famous feature
films about Russian history and performed many roles depicting important
Russian historical figures, including work depicting Grigory Rasputin.
A promise to grant the French actor Russian citizenship was made during a
recent press conference given by Russian President Vladimir Putin, who said
the promise was made due to the significant contributions to Russia’s
national culture by Depardieu and his films.
After being granted citizenship the Depardieu camp has not yet issued an
official statement but the story began with attempts by France to institute
a 75% tax on the super-rich. Russia’s flat rate of 13% tax for all citizens
was then seen as an attractive option for Depardieu who has stated
publically that during his life he has paid over $191 million in taxes to
the French state over the past 45 years. Something the state apparently does
not value.
The new French tax which was to target people making more than €1 million a
year was thrown out by France’s highest constitutional authority because it
was to only target individuals and not households, meaning the law would
only apply to 1,500 people and not affect those making just under €1 million
a year.
Mr. Depardieu’s problems with the French authorities came to a boil when
after announcing his plans to renounce French citizenship, his only recourse
in the row, French Prime Minister Jean-Marc Ayrault publically called Mr.
Depardieu's actions "pathetic." To which Mr. Depardieu answered "I've no
place to complain or to boast, but I refuse to be described as pathetic."
During a press conference that was covered by the VOR in December, President
Putin called Mr. Depardieu a “friend” and said that "If Gérard really wants
to have either a residency permit in Russia or a Russian passport, we will
assume that this matter is settled and settled positively.”
Mr. Depardieu is very well known and loved in Russia and appears on
billboards around Moscow and in ads forSovetsky
Bank.
His films are some of the most popular in Russia and he has been very active
in the Russian cultural scene over the years.
Russian media reports that Mr. Depardieu will soon begin working on several
projects where he will star in adaptations Russian literary classics
including the Brothers Karamazov, Crime and Punishment and The Captain's
Daughter by Alexander Pushkin.
In related news, upon hearing that Mr. Depardieu received Russian
Citizenship, Russian Deputy Prime Minister Dmitry Rogozin predicted the
beginning of the migration of wealthy Europeans to the Russian Federation.
Mr. Rogozin stated on his Twitter page that “In the West people have very
poor knowledge of the Russian tax system but when they learn about it we can
expect the mass migration of wealthy Europeans to Russia".
John
Robles
29 December 2012, 09:36
Litvinenko converted to Islam and was buried under Muslim law – Smith
© Photo: ru.wikipedia.org
Michael John Smith, the last person in history convicted of spying for the
Union of Soviet Socialist Republics in the world, and a former quality
control officer who turned intelligence specialist after his unfair
conviction, spoke to the Voice of Russia about the case of Alexander
Litvinenko and the recent revelations that Litvinenko was working for MI-6
and Spain's secret service.
Michael John Smith
Hello! This is John Robles. I’m speaking with Michael
John Smith.
He is the last person convicted of spying for the Soviet Union in the UK.
Robles: Hello
Mike! How are you this evening?
Smith: Hi
John! Nice to talk to you again.
Robles: Yes,
it’s been a while. What is your opinion on the Litvinenko case and the fact
that he was actually working for MI-6?
Smith: This
is another one of these surprising things that suddenly comes out of the
blue. While it was speculated and discussed, about what he was actually up
to over the time of his death, it now comes out in public that yes, he was
actually working for MI-6 and he was earning something like 2,000 pounds per
month as a salary. So, he was quite a regular agent working for the
government. And also it seems he was working, or was going to work, for the
Spanish secret service as well.
Robles: What
connections do you know about with the Spanish secret services? What was he
doing for them?
Smith: Litvinenko
apparently knew quite a lot about what was going on in Russia and he had
links with the Russian mafia or he knew of links. And he was going to help
the Spanish Government in trying to combat Russian mafia activity in Spain.
Whether the really did know what was going on or it was just a way of
earning more money, I don’t know. It appears that he had links not only with
MI-6 but also with the Spanish secret service.
Robles: He
was also very closely connected with Berizovsky. Have you heard anything
interesting about that connection?
Smith: Possibly
he was involved in some activity involving arms being sold to Chechen
paramilitary groups. It’s only an allegation I think in the UK, but it seems
there might be some truth in it. And one of the reasons that seems to be
also possible is that just before he died, he converted to Islam, and I
believe he was buried under Muslim law.
Robles: Oh,
really! That’s the first time I’ve heard that!
Smith: So,
I think you wouldn’t do that I think, if you are about to die unless you had
some sort of firm connection with Islamic culture.
Robles: What’s
your opinion on the fact that polonium was used in order to assassinate him?
I mean that would be something, I think personally, that would have been
ridiculous for Russian intelligence to do, as far as, that is such a rare
substance and easy to trace etc.
Smith: Yes,
it is very rare. But it is not only the fact that it is rare, it is the fact
that it is hard to get hold of it. How would you actually obtain polonium
unless you had access to it? And that’s one of the reasons there was a lot
of speculation in the UK that the Russian Government was behind this murder,
was because Polonium 210 is very difficult to come by.
Now that sort of raises another issue, doesn’t it? Because if it is a
nuclear material, it must come from some nuclear process. And any country
that has activity in that sort of field could possibly have produced this
Polonium 210. And that raises another further issue which has come up this
year: the case of Yasser Arafat who died two years before Litvinenko in
2004. There’s been a lot of speculation that he died of polonium poisoning
as well.
Robles: How
many assassinations do you know of that have been carried out with polonium?
Smith: Well
they are the only two that I have actually come across which makes it very
unusual.
Robles: Do
you see any connection between the two?
Smith: There
might be, there might be a connection, if possibly the same people are
behind both murders. That could raise lots of possibilities, like: would it
be the same group who want to see Yasser Arafat dead as wanted to see
Litvinenko off-the-scene. I mean possibly Mossad or the Americans could be
behind it, as much as anybody else.
Reminder
Robles: Why
do you think Russia was immediately vilified at that time and blamed for it?
Smith: I
think in the UK, in particular, there are lots of organizations and
individuals who don’t want to see good relationships with Russia. And I
believe about that time we were getting on better in the UK with Russia, in
terms of trade and mutually beneficial processes of getting to know each
other better.
When this murder came up in November 2006, this caused a lot of friction and
I don’t think relations have been good ever since between Russia and the UK.
And that suits certain people I think. For instance it was almost
immediately said that Andrey Lugovoi must be the person responsible because
he’s met with Litvinenko shortly before the murder. But he’s denied it and
as I understand he took a lie-detector test.
Robles: Right!
Smith: Which
as far as the CIA are concerned, a lie-detector is almost evidence that guy
is not lying. So, there are very strange circumstances around this murder. I
do feel that it is in the interests of certain organizations and individuals
in the UK to not want to get on best terms with Russia.
Robles: Can
you give us some examples?
Smith: As
far as trade is concerned having better relationships and developing more
economic ties.
Robles: What
kind of groups are against improved relations?
Smith: The
Conservative Party has never been very happy with good relationships with
the Russians. And it’s always been seen as a negative thing because I
suppose back in the days of the Soviet Union there was all this fear that
was used as a weapon, sort of propaganda that anybody who supported
socialist viewpoint must be in league with the Russians. They used to talk
about “Reds under the bed”, if you remember.
Robles: You
suffered a lot because of that. Do you see that Russophibia or
Sovietophobia, if want to call it that…
Smith: I
think it is still evident. It is maybe not the same as it was then because
Russia is no longer the same country as it was 20 years ago. But it is still
evident I think in the UK.
Robles: A
lot of people in the West still think the KGB exists and still believe that
there are communists running around and everything else.
Smith: Yes,
I mean the KGB is still a term used in the UK whenever Russian secret
services are involved.
Robles: What
about other assassinations that may have been connected to MI-6 or MI-5?
Smith: It
is said that the UK MI-6 doesn’t do that sort of thing. They don’t
assassinate people. But there’ve been lots of instances over the years when
people have disappeared or died and it’s been mysterious. There was a recent
case two years ago of Gareth Williams who actually was an officer working
for the GCHQ in the UK, which is the Government Communications Headquarters.
He was succumbent to MI-6 and working in London.
Robles: The
equivalent of the American NSA, right?
Smith: That’s
right, yes. He was working in London, didn’t appear for maybe a week or so
and then they’ve found him dead in his flat, trussed up in a bag, locked
inside a bag, with the lock on the outside. So, obviously he couldn’t have
done that himself which again looks like a murder nobody came up with a
solution to that one.
Robles: What
connection do you think Litvinenko had and what was he doing for MI-6? What
do you think he was really doing?
Smith: Whatever
he was up to, obviously that has something to do with his death. I think he
must have been delving into something which is not in his best interests.
But Litvinenko would have been using any knowledge he had of what was going
on in Russia to inform his MI-6 handlers, what they should be doing in
Russia I would have thought, to undermine the Russian Government in some
way.
Robles: You
were listening to an interview with Michael John Smith – the last person
convicted of spying for the Soviet Union in the world. You can find part
two on
our website at english.ruvr.ru.
Thanks for listening.
28 December 2012, 12:27
Under the Radar-2: The US Embassy in Benghazi was not an embassy
© Collage: Voice of Russia
Every week hundreds of important events occur that are important to all of
us but which do not get enough media attention, either because they are
over-shadowed by other major news or because they do not fit the pre-planned
message that many of the world’s media are trying to promote, there is a
journalistic responsibility to tell the whole story which we always attempt
to do. Although we keep our eyes on the world this week’s most pressing
issues that have been suppressed come from the US.
1. Global/Military
How is the US Army going to carry out more wars of aggression? This week the
US Army quietly unveiled its new strategic guidelines. Global NATO, global
US Army.
“… the Army is now "more CONUS-based," Soldiers will deploy worldwide in
support of theater commanders and their regional alignment strategies.”
2. Global/Financial
In order to control the world it is necessary to control the world’s money.
Here is yet another tool for global domination by the US
“A ‘Google bank’ or ‘Apple bank’ that’ll certainly emerge will swallow the
greatest part of the traditional banking market.”
3. US/Israel/Iran
With complete disregard to what will happen if, for example, a reactor melts
down, the US and Israel continue aggressive cyber attacks on Iran.
“Iran reported a spree of new cyberattacks Tuesday, saying foreign enemy
hackers tried in recent months to disrupt computer systems at a power
plant…”
4. US/Internal
After the events of 9-11 it was said that at 9,000 people were secretly
detained without trial, redress, or any way to defend themselves, with many
being held completely incommunicado with the outside world. The practice has
continued and been expanded yet the numbers are impossible to ascertain.
“Seattle residents Matt Duran and Katherine Olejnik have been imprisoned in
the SeaTac Federal Detention Center for weeks. Neither of them has been
indicted, arraigned, or even arrested for a crime.”
5. US/Internal/Endless
Terror
If the US Government does not like you or what you do, be you a journalist,
blogger, protestor, hacktivist, freedom advocate, peace activist,
independent entity/country, or any one or thing that does not
“tow-the-line”, they label you a terrorist and proceed to destroy you any
way they can.
“The FBI: Drowning In Counter-Terrorism Money, Power and Other Resources,
Will Apply The Term “Terrorism” To Any Group It Dislikes And Wants To
Control And Suppress”
6. Bahrain/Brutality
Some in the US are waking up to the fact that their government is supporting
dictatorial regimes which brutally suppress democracy in order to advance US
interests. Bahrain has been one of the worst example since the Arab Spring.
“… Aqeel Abdul Mohsen, 19, was shot in the face for protesting against
Bahrain’s government. He was covered in blood, with the lower side of his
face blown open, his jaw shattered, and a broken hand hanging awkwardly from
his wrist…”
The New York Times’ Opinion Pages
7. US/Assassinations/Secrecy
Extra-judicial assassinations, 9-11, the Kennedy Assassination, FBI tracking
guidelines, illegal detention, and even the Free Trade Agreement of the
Americas, are all things the US Government do not want you to know about,
and for good reason: to protect themselves from answering crimes against all
of us. The ALL GOV site has published 11 documents you must not see.
“After he took over the presidency, Barack Obama did away with traditional
legal niceties and decided to just kill Americans who would previously have
been accused of treason or terrorism. His victims have included three
American citizens killed in Yemen in 2011, U.S.-born anti-American cleric
Anwar al-Awlaki, Samir Khan, an al-Qaeda propagandist from North Carolina,
and Awlaki’s 16-year-old son, Abdulrahman al-Awlaki.”
8. The
US National Security Agency (NSA)
The NSA is the most secret of the secret US “security” agencies, yet
sometimes what they are actually doing becomes known to the public. The fact
that the NSA is using the rubric of “security” to attack the operating
systems of domestic power plants and utilities should be cause for alarm.
“The 190 pages of the NSA's Perfect Citizen files, which EPIC obtained
through the Freedom of Information Act last week, are heavily redacted. At
least 98 pages were completely deleted for a number of reasons, including
that portions are "classified top secret," and could "cause exceptionally
grave damage to the national security".
9. Libya/Benghazi/Clinton/Stevens
was CIA
The Benghazi “US Embassy” was not an embassy at all, Clinton continues to
avoid testifying and Stevens was not a diplomat at all but a CIA agent.
“In reality, Islamic terrorist factions that work with the US were employed
by the Saudi Arabian government to take out one of Petraeus’ CIA spies. That
spy’s name was J. Christopher Stevens.”
10. Mass
Media Blackout
The site Blacklisted News has compiled a list of 25 facts the mainstream
mass media does not want you to know about, including massive global
volcanic activity, the US Federal Reserve creating the current economic
crisis, a financial disaster is being predicted for 2013 and that Saudi
Arabia still kills people if they change their religion.
“#15 The mainstream media doesn’t really want to talk about the fact that
hunger and poverty are absolutely exploding in the United States at the same
time that they are telling us that the economy is ‘recovering’.”
11. Syria/Russia/Air
Defenses
Although the Guardian article is definitely biased towards the West the
information that Russian Air-Defense Systems may be the only thing keeping
Syria from being the victim of another aggressive US invasion, is not
something the West really wants you to know.
“Over the weekend, the head of Russia's ground forces air defence, Major
General Alexander Leonov, told the Ekho Moskvy radio station: "Syria's
air-defense system is a no-nonsense force. As a result, no one has ever used
serious air combat power against it."
“That "no-nonsense" force, the air defense command, comprises two divisions
and an estimated 50,000 troops – twice the size of Muammar Gaddafi's force –
with thousands of anti-aircraft guns and more than 130 anti-aircraft missile
batteries.”
12. Africa
The US is further expanding its military presence into 35 African nations,
under the tried and true pretext of the never-ending global “War on Terror!”
“A US Army brigade will begin sending small teams into as many as 35 African
nations early next year, part of an intensifying Pentagon effort to train
countries to battle extremists and give the US a ready and trained force to
dispatch to Africa if crises requiring the US military emerge.”
Dear Reader,
You may be of assistance in compiling this weekly feature, keep your eyes
open and send in your tips and we will add them to the weekly summary. I can
be reached at jar2@list.ru.
Thanks,
27 December 2012, 23:19
ASIO: Meet Bob with D Branch Attorney General's Department, "wink-wink"
© Photo: SXC.hu
It has been revealed that over 200
current and former intelligence officers,
operatives and specialists have posted detailed personal and operational
information on employment and social networking sites. Could it be that
personnel at the Australian Security Intelligence Organization (ASIO) are so
inept or so desperate for work that they are willing to advertise potential
damaging information openly on the web. Perhaps I am overly confident in
their "intelligence", but I don't buy it. Read on.
Among the standard operating procedures and the accepted practices for
intelligences officers, agents and almost all associated personnel, other
than directors and spokes-people, of the world’s intelligence agencies, is
one that bans said personnel from maintaining and possessing personal pages
on social media sites, dating sites, employment sites and the like.
The security concerns and opportunities for compromising agents, operations,
unknowingly providing hostile counter-intelligence organizations and agents
with valuable data (among major concerns), are so many and so wide-ranging,
that if any trained intelligence officer, agent, operative or support
personnel were to do something like posting their special training on the
web, they would be stepping so far out of the bounds of accepted practice
that they would be instantly disciplined, and perhaps have their heads
examined.
The above is true for almost any country in the world, except of course if
you work for the intrepid ASIO, the Australian Security Intelligence
Organization. Currently the word “intelligence” in their name may be a
matter for debate, but regardless, let us not get off the point.
Recently the Sydney
Morning Herald broke a story that
has many intelligence watchers worldwide scratching their heads and
wondering as to the “intelligence” behind Australia’s ASIO.
According to the Herald hundreds, that’s right “hundreds” more than 200 to
be exact, of former and present “spies” have placed information regarding
their employment on-line on sites such as: “LinkedIn, other professional
networking sites and social media including Facebook and Twitter”.
The information they have disclosed is so far ranging and potentially
damaging for the ASIO and so potentially valuable for “foreign intelligence”
that I am cautious as to taking it all at face value. As with all
intelligence operations and activities, nothing happens by accident and
there is always a huge level of duplicity in any activity they engage in,
leading me to believe the whole “data display” may be a carefully planned
operation by Australian Counter Intelligence Operations.
According to the Herald some of the information that was disclosed includes
the following: fact of employment in top secret bodies such as the Defense
Signals Directorate and the Defense Intelligence Organization, location of
employment in specific “secret” facilities, overseas operational theater
postings, intelligence liaison with other country’s agencies, linguistic
skills, specific areas of work, expertise in specific information technology
systems, special counter-terrorism training, telecommunications experience,
aerospace ties, access to 'special compartmented intelligence' programs and
much more.
According to computer forensics experts and information security
professionals the information is a gold-mine that can be used by foreign
intelligence, particular those engaged in social engineering, the practice
of manipulating people into revealing targeted and “secret” information.
For the layman the fact that Raytheon may have secret departments operating
in Australia, that the Defense Signals Directorate, RAAF's No. 3
Telecommunications Unit, the Royal Australian Navy's Shoal Bay Receiving
Station, Britain's Communications Headquarters in Gloucestershire, GCHQ's
Composite Signals Station, the US National Security Agency, and an
Australian Defense Satellite Communications Station, cooperate closely and
employ each other’s personnel, may seem like something worth knowing but for
the “real” intelligence officer, these facts are already open knowledge.
What is dangerous is that if the posting are in fact genuine, and I for one
am extremely skeptical, they open up personnel, their friends, present
employers, families and all acquaintances, for targeting by every kind of
group imaginable, from those involved in industrial espionage, to foreign
counter-intelligence operatives and even terrorist groups.
If we undertake to analyze the “surprising” release of the information under
the premise that nothing occurs accidentally, then we can look at what is
actually being thrown out there like chum in shark infected waters, and more
importantly what is not, and attempt to reach an “intelligent” conclusion as
to the motivations and the real reasons for the release of the information.
We could start by attempting to determine if these “over 200 individuals”
are actually real. Can we prove they are? Or are they cleverly engineered
“bots” that will attract “targets” interested in “secrets”. In this case
could Australian counter intelligence be so desperate to actually find some
work that they are attempting to create it themselves?
If these 200 are in fact real, is it possible they are involved in
disinformation or in actually culling their own contacts and targets. For
example I might tell the world I can program a nuclear war-head and then
wait to see who bites and reel in anyone who is interested in actually doing
that. An intelligence victory is had, or another example I could say I work
for the NSA in Department “M” and wait to see who shows an interest. Using
such reactions and more importantly “non-reactions” to such intelligence is
part of what counter intelligence is all about.
If we assume this is a counter-intelligence operation then we can take the
whole game to the next level and engage in “counter-counter-intelligence”.
For example analyze the information that is “not” being revealed such as:
after a causal look at some of the “information” there was no reference to
“Russia” or “Russian”.
Are we then to assume that the entire ASIO has no Russia Department? Of
course not! But we can ascertain that they have no interest in widening
their Russian operations or attracting Russian individuals, a fact from
which many conclusions can be reached, one of which might be that they
already have someone on the inside of Russian Intelligence, for example.
This is more or less pure counter-intelligence.
Another example might be putting out information that intelligence
operatives specialize in information technology system “A”, which might then
have the less than intrepid hostile agency, going into over-drive to try to
crack “A”. All the while ASIO is building defenses for system “B” which is
currently vulnerable.
So my little piece of advice, if you are approached by one of these “more
than 200” just ignore them, do not interact with them. Real intelligence
officers and specialists rarely need social media and web sites to find
employment if they are in good standing. And if they pretend not to be, it
may be a cover and a ruse. Don’t buy into it.
Lastly
according to the Australian Defense Department's own security directives:
''... when engaged in online forums … personnel must exercise professional
judgment to ensure no information breaches operational security'', since
there is no huge outcry and mass arrests are not taking place, we could
assume no security protocols were broken and all of the information is
either planted or of no real importance, further evidence that a foul game
is afoot.
John
Robles
27 December 2012, 16:44 Men and women: we need each other Dr. AllysonJule
© Photo: SXC.hu
In the continuation of our conversation with Dr. Allyson Jule, Dr. Jule
continues giving her insights into how gender affects learning and the
discusses the stereo-types women and men have to deal with and fight against
both as children and then later as adults. She speaks out against uni-sex
classrooms and how they limit interaction, growth and proper human
development.
John
Robles
27 December 2012, 10:55
My wish is to meet Bradley Manning as a free man very soon - Hrafnsson
http://www.jar2.com/Interviews/Kristinn_Hrafnsson.html
In the third part of our recent interview with Kristinn Hrafnsson, Kristinn
talks about a Russian measure to form an independent banking mechanism that
was the subject of diplomatic cables from the US and was susequently killed,
US spying and information mining and profiling, communications analysis,
Bradley Manning and Julian Assange. Kristinn makes the revelation that the
entire foreign apparatus of the US was activated by banking concerns to stop
the Russian measure.
26 December 2012, 10:55
We transpose our stereotypes onto children - interview
© Photo: Elena Staroselskaya
Download audio file
The Voice of Russia spoke with Dr. Allyson Jule, an author, professor of
education and the co-director of the Gender Studies Institute at Trinity
Western University in Canada, about gender issues and education. Dr. Jule
who recently completed a study on gender in the classroom, with a focus on
the processes involved in linguistics education and how gender affects the
attainment of language knowledge, shared her views and conclusions with the
Voice of Russia. A must-listen for those involved in ESL education and
teachers in general.
John
Robles
26 December 2012, 09:58 6
The Demise of Western Civilization: Rated XXX
© Collage: Voice of Russia
Americans know that many of their politicians and officials are corrupt,
that their police are brutal and their justice system is skewed and too
often looks the other way when it comes to the crimes of those with money
and power. This is the constant subject of American films and television,
yet no one is willing to do anything about it. This is partially due to
childhood conditioning and is a sign of the decline of Western Civilization.
What happens when self-serving, corrupt and power hungry elements, driven by
nothing but pure greed, manipulate and bend the law to their own ends? What
happens when they then obtain this power and these positions of authority
for the sole reason of maintaining and expanding their own wealth and power?
To add to the equation: What then happens when the above officials come to
power in a country with a capitalist system designed and engineered to
support and protect the rich, where the majority of the population are
suppressed and subjugated with an iron hand and which has a policy of world
domination and subjugation, a goal which it is actively willing to promote
and reach at any cost whatsoever?
The answer to the above questions lies in the United States of America and
is exactly what has happened there. Take heed; unfortunately the above
questions are posed in a subdued and understated manner and do not properly
reflect the true dire and urgent nature of the real situation in that
country. Also to properly answer said question would require volumes.
Despite all of that answering these questions is an urgent and pressing
matter as the situation in that country is increasingly affecting each and
every one of us, all over the world, in real and tangible ways, more and
more, with each passing day.
The problem (as we will refer to the total corruption of the entire system)
with Western Society and the Capitalist System is not a secret. Americans at
all levels who have any level of independent thinking are aware of the
“problem”, yet few are willing and/or able to do anything about it, that is
assuming that there is a desire to, and even fewer are willing to publically
confront the problem in any attempt to right the situation.
Like racism the problems affecting Western Society are ones that are taboo
and not a part of serious public debate. Americans do appease themselves and
their consciences by admitting that such problems exist, and even laugh
about societal wrongs, yet almost no one is seriously attempting to correct
the situation and those who do (eg whistleblowers) face the violent
opposition and the full wrath of the American system.
For the foreign observer it seems like lunacy watching the American “show”
and seeing the endless examples of hypocrisy, injustice, malfeasance of
office and the nonfeasance of those in power to do anything, leaving one to
wonder what in the world the American people are thinking and if they
actually are. Yet everywhere there is evidence that they know there is
something wrong with their society and their system and that it is in
decline. Like Sodom and Gomorra and the Roman Empire, Western civilization
is in decay and will go the way of the aforementioned models of
“civilization”.
With regard to awareness, which may be half the battle, most of the
population of the world are consumers of Hollywood movies and exposed to
American media and with the advent of the internet this has become more so.
Those who watch American films often see examples of corrupt politicians,
police and officials doing everything they can to enrichen themselves and
committing every variety of crime and machination with the conclusion being
the typical Hollywood “happy end”, yet in real life there rarely appears a
happy end.
Hollywood knows this and knows that this is one reason that people pay to
watch films. For Americans films are escapism, films are a way to escape the
reality that they have to live with every single day of their lives and one
that they can not escape from. I have always said if you want to know what
American society is like watch a Hollywood film and then for the most part
imagine the opposite of what is shown on the screen, with relation to the
positive.
To understand the full evil that has spread through the West is not enough,
something must be done about it, but that has become an almost impossibility
as the evil and the corruption has gone all the way to the top and the
entire system has been rigged to support and promote those in power and to
respond violently to any threat to the status quo.
Psychologically the American public is being very cleverly manipulated and
controlled through the media and though Hollywood films for example, this is
not some sort of a conspiracy, as anyone who brings the matter up is accused
of promoting, but a reality. These are tools to control the masses and
stifle public outcry. In this regard psychological manipulation,
brain-washing and programming begins from childhood, this is a fact, and
continues until death.
The hypocrisy of America begins in the primary school classroom and more
importantly in the school yard. The US Education System is designed to
instill a high level of patriotism in the population, this is first and
foremost and is necessary to keep such a widely disperse population under
control.
Unknown to most of the world’s population, every first lesson of the day
from primary school until high school begins with what is called the “Pledge
of Allegiance” where students stand and face the ever present American Flag,
put their hands on their hearts and recite an oath to America learned by
rote. However the real learning, which has long lasting effects, occurs in
the school yard. In brief children learn from their peers that bullies can
do whatever they want and are “kings” and those who come from wealthy white
families can also do whatever they want and are untouchable.
Further education, after the “free” system, is then made available for a
large part, only to the elites because they are more likely to promote the
system which is designed to ensure their own elitist survival and not the
survival of the masses, hence what we see today.
This thinking: extreme patriotism, violence as a means for conflict
resolution, the rich as untouchable, and the supremacy of the white race, is
learned and reinforced from an early age and further promoted and reinforced
by society, the media, authorities and peers.
Thinking people know it is wrong and the general public know it is wrong but
the system is designed in such a manner and going outside of it is dangerous
and nearly impossible, and anyone who seeks accountability is quickly and
brutally marginalized and gotten rid of as brutally and permanently as
possible.
To tell the American people that their “government of the people by the
people” is a fallacy is something that they do not want to hear, although
they know it, it does not fit in with their programming. They know they are
powerless and merely exist to support and promote the state. This may sound
Orwellian but it is the reality.
This powerlessness in conjunction with the glorification of violence, the
promotion of the belief that force is the answer to all problems and that
weapons are something that are owned by a “free” people leads to bursts of
violence that are largely incomprehensible to people outside the US, hence
an endless stream of events such as the recent Connecticut shootings.
The powerlessness and injustice also draws people to the box office to see
how the hero beats the system, gets rich, finds love and the corrupt villain
finally gets what he deserves, things which in reality rarely happen.
The total supremacy of the corporate state and the corrupt leaders running
it became evident to anyone who had any doubts after the events of September
11, 2001.
For the neo-conservatives planners behind the Project for a New American
Century, who many believe were the actual architects of 9-11, it was not
only a watershed moment and a catalyst for global domination; it was also
the end of the “liberty” of the American population.
Although the planner’s intention was to create a new era of total American
global domination, something we are seeing today, in reality it also created
the conditions and all of the mechanisms for the actual decline and demise
of Western Civilization. In brief the planners bit off more than they could
chew and the global resistance was not something they properly expected or
planned for.
I am an optimist and a humanist and still naively believe that human nature
is basically good and we all seek justice and fairness and that good will
always prevail over evil, no matter how long it suffers or is muffled. In
this regard I am sure that real justice must prevail, not the justice meted
out by brutal police, corrupt officials and a justice system that serves the
interests of the few, but real justice.
The people know there is something wrong with the system and with their
society but that is not enough, when the system is designed to be controlled
from the top down. Those in power who control and run the system must also
be convinced that what they are promoting and protecting is not right.
Change in the US must come from the top. Something that is unlikely to
happen.
So as with any recalcitrant repeat offender, change must then be forced from
the outside. In this regard a multi-polar world is an absolute must as are
global independent bodies which serve the interests of true justice and all
of the countries of the world and have real “teeth”, not just US controlled
“surrogates” such as the UN and Hague.
The American people know there is a problem, yet seem to refuse to do
anything about it as evidenced by media depictions of brutal police,
corruption, war crimes and the like. However it may be too late to do
anything about it. Regardless, courage must be found to battle evil, no
matter at what level, for without courage, all will be lost, if in fact it
has already not been.
25 December 2012, 14:15 3 The genocide of the American Indians was the worst ethnic cleansing in history - Dr. Daniel N. Paul
In the third and final part of an interview with Indian Historian and
Mi'kmaq elder Dr. Daniel Paul, the discussion continues regarding the
genocide of the American indigenous peoples. Dr. Paul discusses the
disingenuous "apology" by the US Government which was attached to a Defense
Bill, the continued suppression of the real history of North America in the
school systems of the continent and the continued institutionalized racism
Native Americans face.
PART 1: Democracy existed in the Americas long before the Europeans invaded
- Mi'kmaq Elder
PART 2: Indians were classified as wild animals - exclusive interview
24 December 2012, 12:59
Politicians are being more and more controlled by corporations - Hrafnsson
© Collage: Voice of Russia
WikiLeaks number 2 and the official spokesperson for the portal Kristinn
Hrafnsson recently spoke to the Voice of Russia and in part two of that
conversation, discusses the struggle of WikiLeaks, the international nature
of the organization and leaks from all over the world. Also on the table is
the topic of alternatives to US based financial mechanisms and the possible
formation of independent international financial mechanisms.
20 December 2012, 23:45
Update: End of the world cancelled by Putin with 15 hours left
Photo: AFP
Warning: There will be no end of the world on 12-21-2012 at 11:11 GMT.
Please stay calm and proceed with your lives as usual. After intense
negotiations and a secret call to the Supreme Being the President of the
Russian Feeration Vladimir Putin has made arrangements to move the date by
4.5 million years. Although the President did not say exactly when the end
will occur we are asking you to please make no plans for the year 4,502,012
A.D. We will inform you of the exact date when it is made available.
UPDATE: 13 days, 20 hours to the end of the world
29
days to the end of the world
20 December 2012, 09:05
The unstable politicians in the US are dangerous – WikiLeaks spokesperson
Photo: AFP
In an exclusive interview with the Voice of Russia, WikiLeaks official
spokesperson Kristinn Hrafnsson speaks about the Freedom of the Press
Foundation and their new initiative to provide help and assistance to
members of the press who are being persecuted for seeking to tell the truth.
In particular the FPF offers a way to circumvent the illegal extra-judicial
blockade against WikiLeaks. He also talked about unstable and dangerous
American politicians. http://www.jar2.com/Interviews/Kristinn_Hrafnsson.html
19 December 2012, 15:54
Westboro attacks slain children, Anonymous attacks Westboro
© Collage "The Voice of Russia"
After yet another in a seemingly endless eternal series of tragic American
mass-murders, this time taking the lives of 20 children, the infamous and
now world known Westboro Baptist Church, has crawled out of the woodwork and
announced they will openly defile the memories of grieving mourners holding
a vigil at the school where 27 people were mercilessly gunned down,
prompting the Knights of the Internet, Anonymous, to launch a full scale
attack on the “church”, an organization which a growing number of people
want to see classified as what it is, a hate group.
In the recent past we have seen the hactivist group Anonymous becoming more
and more active all over the world, coming out to electronically defend the
defenseless, and fight for justice when in the real world there is none.
Anonymous appears almost instantly wherever there is an injustice and the
this time the target, and I must say it is about time, is the infamous
Westboro Baptist Church, a tool of Satan if there ever was one.
The Westboro Baptist Church is being targeted this time for announcing that
they are going to hold one of their twisted little hate parties at a vigil
for the victims of the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting in the US state
of Connecticut.
If you live outside of the United States then perhaps you have never heard
of the Westboro Baptist Church, and you are lucky. Like Pastor Terry Jones,
the Ku Klux Klan, neo-nazi (sic) groups and others, the Westboro Baptist
Church is another self-righteous lunatic fringe hate group willing to do
anything for attention and hiding behind lax US laws on freedom of speech to
promote their twisted message of hate to the masses.
The Westboro Baptist Church is famous for protesting at the funerals of
soldiers, applauding their deaths while claiming it is the will of God
because the US more or less accepts gays. Their site name says it all God
Hates Fags, no not cigarettes, but the American epithet for people of the
homosexual persuasion.
Fortunately for most of the world’s population groups with such an obviously
twisted message and M.O. do not operate in their countries, but America is
different, it breeds hate and perversion and then allows it to parade around
and corrupt others and strengthen and grow. They call it freedom of speech
and expression.
Back to the matter at hand; the so-called “Church”,
as much of a church as Terry Jones is preacher, says they are going to
defile the memory of dead little children and spit in the face of the
parents and the mourning families of the deceased to protest a 2008 ruling
by the state of Connecticut legalizing gay marriage, on their Twitter page
they posted a message which stated: “Westboro will picket Sandy Hook
Elementary School to sing praise to God for the glory of his work in
executing his judgment.”
The group feeds on hate and attention, so actually writing about them and
giving them that attention is completely counterproductive if our goal is to
make them finally go away for Christ’s sake. Anonymous has decided to
attacked the goons for targetting the school and they must be applauded
given that the US authorities have not seen fit to take measures, yet are
always ready to imprison people for sharing hyperlinks and stealing penny
candy. It is a shame on them that these people who wantonly spread hate,
spit on the dead and are a blight on the American image internationally, are
allowed to prance around on and on.
Such groups and individuals such as Terry Jones spread their hate and cause
untold suffering, destruction and deaths yet are allowed to operate, leaving
one to question the real legitimacy of the entire US system.
The American people are upset, even petitioning Obama to recognize the
“church” as a hate group. A
petition on the White House site reads:
“This group has been recognized as a hate group by organizations, such as
The Southern Poverty Law Center, and has repeatedly displayed the actions
typical of hate groups. Their actions have been directed at many groups,
including homosexuals, military, Jewish people and even other Christians.
They pose a threat to the welfare and treatment of others and will not
improve without some form of imposed regulation”, the petition already has
over 207, 700 signatures and growing.
Even though the group targets Jewish people, a group the United States
jealously claims to protect, there has so far been no action taken against
them hence the need for a more populace based reaction. In this regard, the
Knights of the Internet have heard the call.
Anonymous has come out in force and promises
to fight the “church” until they are destroyed releasing
a video before they launched operations against the church which said: “We
will not allow you to corrupt the minds of America with your seeds of
hatred. We will not allow you to inspire aggression to the social factions
which you deem inferior. We will render you obsolete. We will destroy you.
We are coming.”
Part of the moves by Anonymous included publishing the personal information
of church members on-line including e-mail addresses, phone numbers, social
security numbers and other personal information using twitter accounts
belonging to YourAnonNews and LulzExecutive among others. Anonymous also
took the church’s website down changed the personal desktop wallpaper of the
leader of the “church” Shirley Phelps-Roper, to gay porn and has promised to
do more.
In what might be termed a war proclamation Anonymous
later stated:
“Since your one-dimensional thought protocol will conform not to any modern
logic, we will not debate, argue, or attempt to reason with you. Instead, we
have unanimously deemed your organization to be harmful to the population of
the United States of America, and have therefore decided to execute an
agenda of action which will progressively dismantle your institution of
deceitful pretext and extreme bias, and cease when your zealotry runs dry.
We recognize you as serious opponents, and do not expect our campaign to
terminate in a short period of time. Attrition is our weapon, and we will
waste no time, money, effort and enjoyment, in tearing your resolve into
pieces, as with exposing the incongruity of your distorted faith.”
This Op is explosive and is highly detailed. It's not just the hacking, we
have a huge contingent of counter protesters on the ground and a team of
Anons following the WBC people's every move in Newtown.
Lastly as for the “church” and their corruption of scripture which in this
case seems proven to be open to diametrically opposed translations, let’s
take a look at what they preach at the "church".
Westboro : "GOD HATES FAGS" (sic) “… though elliptical, is a profound
theological statement, which the world needs to hear more than it needs
oxygen, water and breathe.”
The Bible: John 3:1 “How great is the love the Father has lavished on us,
that we should be called children of God! And that is what we are! The
reason the world does not know us is that it did not know him.”
These lines from the Book of John could be said to prove that God loves ALL
of his children, even the homosexual ones.
As for those the world does not know, we will just call them Anonymous.
Expect them.
17 December 2012, 22:34
“They keep people in shackles and chains without trial or investigation,
like in the Middle Ages” – Putin
Photo: RIA Novosti
With the passing of the Magnitsky Act the US has once again taken it upon
itself to interfere in the internal sovereign workings and affairs of the
Russian Federation and expanding their sanctimonious role as the world’s
policeman, judge, jury and executioner. No matter what the US claims, and no
matter what they say or how they attempt to gloss over and present the
matter, the Magnitsky Act is at best a case of meddling into the affairs of
a sovereign nation and at worst a hypocritical affront, provocation, attempt
at stealing assets and at the same time a belittling of Russia, the Russian
judiciary, and the Russian people.
Despite claims by some US officials that the Magnitsky Act is about human
rights and that it is not anti-Russian, in reality the opposite is true, the
act will not only arbitrarily affect Russian citizens and their "human
rights" it also attempts to unilaterally punish the Russian Federation and
impose sanctions on Russia and Russian nationals on the supposed pretext of
a human rights violation in a case that is still under investigation and for
which people have already been punished.
The US is indignant of course with Russia saying no to USAID and requiring
NGOs to be transparent, there is little else they can do to demonize Russia
other than passing internal laws like the Magnitsky Act, just another
attempt at manipulating yet another country to bend to the US will.
Russian experts, Russia experts, politicians, pundits, organizations,
diplomats, foreign relations experts, government officials, judicial bodies
and organizations, commentators, analysts and even the president of the
country all say one thing, the Magnitsky Act is anti-Russia and
anti-Russian, so to say otherwise would require monumental arrogance and
ignorance.
Last Thursday the president stated that the death of Mr. Magnitsky was a
tragedy and that the investigation into the case is not even over, this is
no matter to the US right-wing proponents of the Magnitsky Act, they need to
jump on some demonizing band-wagon and Magnitsky’s sad and tragic death fits
the bill. It is telling that they could not find anything more damning.
Now if we look at the other side of the equation, there are many more things
that not only Russia but the international community could sanction the US
for, some example as stated by the president: "So nobody dies in their
prisons, right? Maybe there are more [deaths] in theirs than in ours.” Yes
president Putin, at least 4,150
in 2010.
Vladimir Putin:
“…they haven't shut Guantanamo for eight years now. They keep people in
shackles and chains without trial or investigation, like in the Middle
Ages.” Yes president Putin and possibly thousands have died or been killed
in the whole terror and secret arrest program.
People who have also been guilty of
state run executions, an out of control for-profit prison system,
institutionalized police brutality, inhumane and ill-treatment of foreign
nationals, torture, Guantanamo Bay prison, extraordinary rendition, human
experimentation, aggressive war, extra-judicial executions and much much
more.
Yes President Putin and dear reader these are the same people who can not
find anything else wrong with Russia than the sad and tragic death of a poor
lawyer in custody who died because medical attention did not arrive on
time.
New York University Professor Steven Cohen has compared the adoption of the
“Magnitsky Act” by US lawmakers with the aggressive behavior of a drunken
street gang. The political analyst told the Voice of America in
an interview that now the Congressmen are
going to look for bad guys and punish them. He expects numerous lobbying
groups to crop up around the “Magnitsky Act”, since oligarchs will clearly
use such groups to square accounts, set up their rivals and take away the
property that the rivals have in the United States.
Russia will repond:
“Russian lawmakers are to take up an amended version of an all-parties bill
to impose financial and travel restrictions on American officials who were
involved in abusing the rights of Russian citizens.”
"The Russian parliament is preparing to denounce the adoption agreement with
the US, Liberal
MP Yelena Afanasyeva has said.
Lower-house State Duma is currently working on an amendment, she said.”
“The Russian parliament responded to the US Magnitsky List by approving the
‘black list’ of American officials to be banned from entering Russia. Given
that the Russian Magnitsky List has been endorsed by all parliamentary
factions, the bill will undoubtedly be passed into law by January 1st .
Under the Russian bill, all US officials involved in breaching the rights of
Russian nationals will become personae non grata. President Putin said
earlier this week that the Russian response to the Magnitsky
Act would be ‘appropriate, not disproportionate.”
Earlier I had suggested a war on terror list,
the US is lucky the Russian Government did not go that route. That list
would have had thousands of names on it.
As for human rights other than US backed NGOs, in reality there are not many
people in Russia looking for the US to solve any “human rights” problems in
Russia and you can take that to the bank.
17 December 2012, 16:10
Info-War adapt and regroup: WikiLeaks and Freedom of the Press Foundation
© Flickr.com/Nils Geylen/cc-by-sa 3.0
The world wide information war continues and righteous, true proponents of
truth, transparency and accountability, embattled by the arbitrary
extra-judicial persecution being meted out on them by a corrupt
out-of-control system that is attempting to subjugate the entire planet, are
adapting, regrouping, forming unions, expanding and strengthening their
positions. In this regardWikiLeaks has
joined up with a new organization called the Freedom of the Press Foundation
which will help to advance and protect those who are fighting for the truth
to be heard.
In reality it is a war pitting good against evil that has ramifications for
all of mankind and for the sake of humanity, good must prevail.
Mark my words, make no doubt and take heed, we are at war. Not a physical
war in the standard meaning of the word, when two honorable armies stand
face to face on the battlefield and proceed to slaughter each other, nor in
the new meaning of the word, when men in bunkers half a world away use
drones to wantonly target and obliterate anything they please in a poor
country on the other side of the planet, but a war of words, an information
war that threatens the freedom and liberty of every human being on earth.
The battles are taking place on different fronts but the war is of epic,
global and even biblical proportion. The war has pitted the people of the
world, on the whole humans who are becoming servile subjects eking out a
parsimonious existence, against the all-powerful and all-knowing governments
that have enslaved them yet were supposed to be their servants. That is not
a dramatization, but in reality, an understated conclusion as to what has
become of the world.
Some of the fronts in this war include areas such as: intrusive surveillance
and monitoring equipment and regimes made possible by the brilliant advances
in technology during the last twenty years, the manipulation and control of
financial institutions and markets whereby financial power is guaranteed to
those controlling the equation, an iron-fisted, extra-judicial, illegal and
out-of-control-police-state which along with the western military complex is
expanding globally and lastly every interface you have for obtaining
information about what is really going on in the world.
The goal of the all powerful unilateral self-serving super state is to
control and subject you so you are passively pliant, dumbed down and present
no threat whatsoever to their illegal, corrupt and self-serving abuse and
holding of power.
In the information war we have huge governments with vast unlimited
resources and media which they control and which goose-steps strictly in
line with the super-government against independent and principled
alternative media, state run non-commercial independent media, journalists,
bloggers, Hacktivists, whistle-blowers and even members of their own
security apparatus fighting against the criminal state from within.
One of those alternative media outlets is WikiLeaks, which has brought to
the mainstream the fight for freedom of information and calls for
accountability. As we know WikiLeaks is embattled and suffering after more
than two years under an extra-judicial banking blockade and with its public
face forced into hiding in an embassy in London. The super-global-government
(meaning that of the United States of America) has not backed down from its
relentless persecution of these champions of information freedom, but has
continued their endless onslaught on journalistic freedom on all fronts.
According to a press release from WikiLeaks, today, in answer to that a new
source of information has been launched called the Freedom
of the Press Foundation or FPF.
The FPF is an initiative of Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) co-founder
John Perry Barlow, former Pentagon Papers whistleblower Daniel Ellsberg,
actor John Cusack and others, and will crowd-source fundraising and support
for organizations or individuals under attack for publishing the truth. It
aims to promote "aggressive, public-interest journalism focused on exposing
mismanagement, corruption and law-breaking in government". This is part of WikiLeaks
declaration of war on the elitist US controlled banking system.
According to WikiLeaks the
blockade has stopped 95 per cent of contributions to WikiLeaks which has
been forced to use cash reserves, which they say amounted to more than one
million dollars in 2010 to under a thousand dollars by December 2012.
The new initiative, combined with a recent victory in Germany, means
contributions to WikiLeaks now have tax-deductible status throughout the
United States and Europe.
From his refuge in the Ecuadorian Embassy in London Julian Assange said:
“We've fought this immoral blockade for two long years. We smashed it in the
courts. We smashed it in the Treasury. We smashed it in France. We smashed
it in Germany. And now, with strong and generous friends who still believe
in First Amendment rights, we're going to smash it in the United States as
well.” When asked what will happen if the financial giants blockade the FPF
he responded: "Let Visa, Mastercard, PayPal and all the rest block the
independent Freedom of the Press Foundation. Let them demonstrate to the
world once again who they really are!"
According to the foundation in a press release from WikiLeaks; “The
Foundation's first 'bundle' will crowd-source funds for WikiLeaks, the
National Security Archive, The UpTake and MuckRock News. Donors will be able
to use a slider to set how much of their donation they wish each
organization to receive and can donate to WikiLeaks using their credit
cards. The Foundation holds 501(c) charitable status, so donations are
tax-deductible in the U.S. Other courageous press organizations will be
added as time goes by.”
John Perry Barlow,
a board member of the new FPF says they aim to achieve more than just
crowd-sourced fundraising: "We hope it makes a moral argument against these
sorts of actions. But it could also be the basis of a legal challenge. We
now have private organizations with the ability to stifle free expression.
These companies have no bill of rights that applies to their action – they
only have terms of service."
According to WikiLeaks: “Initiatives such as the Freedom of the Press
Foundation are vital to sustain a truly independent free press. In heavily
redacted European Commission documents recently released by WikiLeaks,
MasterCard Europe admitted that U.S. Senate Homeland Security Chairman
Joseph Lieberman and Congressman Peter T. King were both directly involved
in instigating the blockade.”
Journalist Glenn Greenwald who
is also on the FPF board stated: "What possible political value can the
internet serve, or journalism generally, if the U.S. government, outside the
confines of law, is empowered − as it did here − to cripple the operating
abilities of any group which meaningfully challenges its policies and
exposes its wrongdoing? That the U.S. government largely succeeded in using
extra-legal and extra-judicial means to cripple an adverse journalistic
outlet is a truly consequential episode: nobody, regardless of one's views
on WikiLeaks, should want any government to have that power."
With the 3 days to go until the release of Tyler by Anonymous, the passing
of more intrusive internet standards by the US on a global level and the
continued cracking down on civil liberties in the US and the expansion of
those policies to the world: the information war continues and the epic
battle against the
illegal-corrupt-criminal-usurpers-of-power-masquerading-as-a-righteous-government
sees no end in sight.
16 December 2012, 22:49
Under the Radar-1: US’ military adventures
may
lead to World War III
© Collage: «The Voice of Russia»
Every week hundreds of important events occur that are important to all of
us but which do not get enough media attention, either because they are
over-shadowed by other major news or because they do not fit the pre-planned
message that many of the world’s media are trying to promote, there is a
journalistic responsibility to tell the whole story which I always attempt
to do. In this dear reader you may be of assistance, keep your eyes open and
send in your tips and we will add them to the weekly summary which we have
decided to call “Under the Radar”.
1. Iran
Number one this week goes to the Voice of Russia
"This is very dangerous for everyone, and even for the future of Europe,"
General Hassan Firouzabadi told the top brass at a military college, saying
each missile was "a black dot on the map, (setting the stage) to create a
world war."
2. Africa
Racism continues in South Africa
White middle class South Africans are quick to show solidarity with rhinos,
but where is their outrage when it comes to underpaid black workers,
inequality and poverty, asks Benjamin Fogel.
3. Australia
The total security state has come to Australia
Australian law enforcement and government agencies have sharply increased
their access without warrant to vast quantities of private telephone and
internet data, prompting new calls for tighter controls on surveillance
powers.
Australia is at the center of the New World Order (NWO)
US President Barack Obama will use troop withdrawals in Iraq and Afghanistan
to bolster forces in the Asia-Pacific - the strongest sign yet that
Australia will be at the centre of a new world order.
4. The
United States of America
Mass shooting in Connecticut being spun for political gain
Bloomberg is playing the shill for new gun control. He’s the point man of
the moment, insisting “the president do something meaningful” right now.
It’s an orchestrated little play. “Let’s ask Michael Moore what he thinks.”
“Oh good, Rupert Murdoch is weighing in against guns.” Yes, he’s providing
the “balanced” in “fair and balanced,” so people stop associating FOX News
with “right-wing gun advocates” for a few hours.
More intrusive electronic surveillance and monitoring ahead
NHTSA established a regulation that sets forth requirements for data
elements, data capture and format, data retrieval, and data crash
survivability for event data recorders (EDRs) installed in light vehicles.
Clinton won’t testify on Benghazi, surprise surprise!
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton won't testify to Congress next week on
Benghazi, after fainting and suffering a concussion Saturday and due to her
ongoing stomach ailment.
Everyone is a potential terrorist and must be watched
Top U.S. intelligence officials gathered in the White House Situation Room
in March to debate a controversial proposal. Counterterrorism officials
wanted to create a government dragnet, sweeping up millions of records about
U.S. citizens—even people suspected of no crime.
5. NATO
NATO threatens Russia
NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen has argued that Russia would
shoot itself in the foot if it decided to use its energy exports to Europe
as a foreign policy weapon because, he warned, the Europeans would then look
for alternative sources of energy imports.
NATO continues to spread like a cancer
Georgian Defense Minister Irakli Alasania discussed military cooperation
with the foreign ministers of Sweden and Bulgaria, and the head of the
Polish presidential administration.
6. Syria
Western backed terrorists having an effect on Syrian population
With the growing presence of radical Islamists affiliated with al-Qaida in
Syria, fear and apprehension have crept up among the moderate Syrians,
sending chills down their spines about the vague and uncertain future of
their country.
Syria blames West for the suffering of the Syrian people
Syria's foreign minister blamed the suffering of his country's people on
U.S. and European sanctions imposed on his country, telling a top U.N.
official Saturday that the international body should condemn these measures
and work toward lifting them.
The West ramps up the Psychological Warfare against Syria
NATO Turns Up Heat in Syria Psy-War NATO tells tales of recently launched
"Scud missiles" to retroactively justify Patriot missile deployment months
in the making.
U.S. public says U.S. does not have responsibility to act in Syria
The public continues to say that the U.S. does not have a responsibility to
do something about the fighting in Syria and there continues to be
substantial opposition to sending arms to anti-government forces in Syria.
7. China
A knife-wielding man injured 22 children and one adult outside a primary
school in central China as students were arriving for classes Friday, police
said, the latest in a series of periodic rampage attacks at Chinese schools
and kindergartens.
8. Turkey
The United States plans to deploy Patriot missile batteries and about 400
troops to Turkey following the announcement of a similar move by Germany.
9. Russia
Statements taken out of context continue to be promoted by Western media,
however the truth is not.
Russia’s Deputy Foreign Minister Mikhail Bogdanov has denied having made any
new statements on Syria, the ministry’s spokesman, Alexander Lukashevich
said Friday.
The West spins this as they will of course, but the truth that Navalny may
be just another bandit is being largely ignored.
Investigators said they suspect Alexei Navalny and his brother Oleg of
defrauding a transportation company of 55 million rubles ($1.8 million) by
overcharging it for postal services.
The truth about Pussy Riot is an inconvenient one, this time from a Western
writer
Their views on the system enabled them to steal food and beverages from
grocery stores which they considered a form of art. In 2008, they staged an
orgy as an example of artistic expression in Moscow’s Timiryazev State
Musuem of Biology. Nadezhda Tolokonnikova who participated in the orgy was
9-months pregnant and gave birth 4 days later to a baby girl, a fact that
the media forgot to tell you about.
10. Egypt
The true failure of the US and its imperialistic Middle Eastern polices is
worth hearing more about and Egypt epitomizes it.
Egyptian President Mohamed Morsi's attempt to grab power raises many
questions not only about Egypt's future but also about the Middle East and
US foreign policy, despite Morsi having scrapped the decree under the
pressure of massive protests
11. Europe
The European Court of Human Rights has ruled that the kidnapping and illegal
transfer of a German national to US custody has violated the most basic
guarantees of human decency.
15 December 2012, 13:36
Western backed Free Syrian Army has crossed the line
The Free Syrian Army has committed an affront to all humanity by kidnapping
and threatening to execute a female Ukrainian
journalist and
announcing that they will kill all Russians and Ukrainians they find in
Syria. This could be taken to be akin to a declaration of war, obviously the
armed insurgents in Syria have been emboldened to a point that they have
stepped into an area where they are beyond the law.
With the terrorists also threatening Russian and Ukrainian Diplomatic
Missions this could set off a chain of events that may pull the Russian
Federation directly into the conflict. If the lives of Russians are at risk
Russia has the right to protect its citizens and to assist unaligned Ukraine
if there is such a request.
The world knows the Free Syrian Army is supported by the US and the West and
if the Russian Federation was forced to consider entering Syria militarily
this would make such a decision extremely dangerous. The security, in this
case for the diplomatic missions, lies with Syria as does the freeing of the
hostage, but if the Syrian Government hypothetically requests Russian
assistance, how will this affect the position of the US and the West who
have battle groups poised to invade the country at a moment’s notice?
If you are pretending to be my friend but paying and supporting criminals
who have threatened to kill my family and loved ones then wouldn’t it be
logical to say that you are my enemy and that if I want to save my loved
ones then I should neutralize the threat, including you?
Take this to a larger level and consider that Russia has dealt in a
civilized manner with the backers of the so called Free Syrian Army,
terrorists, killers and mercenaries operating in Syria and who openly
threaten to kill Russians, Ukrainians and Iranians, attack and kill
civilians and execute unarmed civilians, in reality what would the reaction
be? If the Free Syrian Army had kidnapped an American and threatened to
destroy the US and UK Missions, what would the reaction be?
One might argue that the Free Syrian Army which has effectively declared war
on Russia, Ukraine and Iran, and since they are backed by the West this
might appear to be a proxy declaration. The US of course would not declare
war on Russia or Iran. Formal Declarations of War are not something the US
does, just like they did not declare war on Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya,
Yugoslavia, Syria and Iran.
For all of the cowboy diplomacy of the West and their macho bravado and
military might the men hiding in their comfortable bunkers and command rooms
and expensive suburban homes are slippery creatures who fight their battles
by proxy and use pretexts designed and carried out in secret. They will
therefore provide material and financial support to terrorist organizations
such as the Free Syrian Army when it is expedient, but will they back away
from their proxies now that they have stated “Let not a single Russian,
Ukrainian or Iranian come out of Syria alive”?
The US Government has officially recognized an umbrella group of mainly
foreign terrorist organizations, as the official representative of the
Syrian people, and almost immediately the main US surrogate threatens to
execute a Ukrainian woman journalist. IF you had doubts before, have no
doubt now, these are not “freedom fighters” they are coward criminals. Who
would execute a woman? Not even any self-respecting Muslim terrorist
extremist would stoop so low.
The journalist who was kidnapped, Anhar
Kochneva has
been stationed in Syria for years and has been instrumental in getting the
true picture out of Syria on many occasions, one reason why she is obviously
a target for the West and its surrogates as they continue their information
war to justify an invasion. She has done work for several Russian media
outlets, including the NTV, RenTV and RT television channels and the Utro.Ru
news portal and according to RIA Novosti has been a vocal supporter of
President Bashar Al Assad.
According to the site Syria
News online “That
the joint statement of the Reporters Without Borders, Committee to Protect
Journalists (CPJ), ARTICLE 19, the International Press Institute also calls
on the British, French and US governments as well as on the European Union
(UN) to work with “their” external staged Syrian opposition in order to
facilitate the release of the journalist Anhar Kochneva is also not
surprising. It either shows who are the masterminds and supporters behind
the “Free Syrian Army” (FSA) or who is really responsible for this
(expletive) situation in Syria.”
In normal world we might see Russian and Ukrainian Special Forces alongside
Syrian Special Services launching a rescue operation and wiping out the Free
Syrian Army for making the declarations they have made, surely if the same
thing happened to America, that would be the case, but as we all know who is
behind all of this we know that this would kick off what might well be Word
War III, something no one wants.
Kiev demands freedom for kidnapped journalist
Ukraine has called on the Syrian authorities to take decisive steps to free
Ankhar Kochneva, a Ukrainian journalist kidnapped in Syria on October 10.
Ukraine’s Foreign Ministry spokesman Alexander Dikusarov said Kiev expected
more tangible results from regime’s action to secure a safe release of the
Ukrainian.
“Ukraine demands an immediate release of Ankhar Kochneva and will take
action to get the issue of violence against a civilian into international
discussion,” Mr. Dikusarov said.
Ukraine hopes this act of rebel violence will be harshly condemned and
punished by the international community, he added.
Ankhar Kochneva worked as an interpreter for a Russian TV crew when she was
kidnapped by Syrian militants. The same day, Ukraine’s President Viktor
Yanukovich gave instructions to the country’s foreign office to do
everything possible to free the journalist.
Ukrainian journalist life threatened in Syria
Syrian militants are threatening to execute journalist Ankhar Kochneva. They
are demanding 50 million U.S. dollars for her life. The ultimatum that was
signed by the field commanders of the paramilitary wing of the opposition
Free Syrian Army expires on December 13th.
Militants say that Ankhar Kochneva is a “Ukrainian spy”. Kochneva, a
Ukrainian citizen, lived in Russia for the past 10 years. In January this
year she went to Syria to work there as a journalist and translator. Ankhar
Kochneva is the author of many interesting and exciting reports for Russian
media outlets.
The Voice of Russia “contacted” her when it was necessary to comment on the
situation in the hot spots in Syria, including Homs. Whenever a call from
Moscow came, Ankhar Kochneva was always at a combat post.
Her reports were always different from the picture presented by the Al
Jazeera TV Channel and other media that supported the fight of the
irreconcilable opposition against the Syrian authorities. Most likely, it
was exactly her objective opinion about the developments in Syria that
pushed all those who are standing up for militants to kidnap Ankhar which
occurred on October 7th .
In a November 28th video address she asked Russia’s and Ukraine’s
governments to fulfill the kidnappers’ demands. For their part, a number of
Russian media outlets urged Syrian ambassador to Russia Riad Haddad to do
all in his power so that Ankhar Kochneva could be freed as soon as possible.
The Russian Committee of Solidarity with the Peoples of Libya and Syria is
making efforts in this direction, one of the heads of the non-governmental
organization Darya Mitina says.
"The ultimatum, delivered by the militants, is urging the parties concerned
to start searching for non-trivial solutions as well as for an advancement
in the talks. Regrettably, for the time being, the means to influence the
militants are limited. We have applied to international human rights and
journalist agencies with a request to pay continued attention to this topic
on both radio and television. There is little information about the
kidnapping attack now, taking into account the role Kochneva played in the
public information space."
As a rule, no details are given about talks with kidnappers or about the
ransom terms. Judging by the facts, the talks are currently under way. An
expert with the Institute of Oriental Studies, Vladimir Isayev, says:
"Russia has established contacts with the Syrian opposition. Some time ago
talks with opposition representatives were held in Moscow. However, I don’t
think that they are involved in the kidnapping. Therefore, I don’t know
whether Russia has any possibility or any contacts to influence the
opposition and thus, to ensure the release of Ankhar Cochneva. And quite
another matter is the fact that Russia can appeal to all those who support
the Syrian opposition – for example, to Turkey with which top-level talks
were recently held."
A week after Ankhar Kochneva was kidnapped, Ukraine’s President Viktor
Yanukovych gave instructions to his aides to do everything possible for
secure her release. This occurred on October 15th . No other reports about
Kiev’s stand have come since then.
Syrian rebels threaten Ukrainian journalist with death
A group of Syrian rebels have threatened to kill the Ukrainian journalist
captured on October 9 if they are not paid a ransom.
The deadline for the ransom payment is set for December 13, 2012, the
journalist’s friend and Russian ex-MP Darya Mitina has told reporters. “If
the money isn’t paid by that time, she will be killed as a ‘Ukrainian spy’,”
she added.
Ankhar Kochneva’s relatives have confirmed that the kidnappers contacted
them and demanded a ransom but said they didn’t believe December 13 was the
deadline.
Kochneva’s nephew Dmitry was cited as saying he had no detail of
negotiations to free his aunt. “The foreign office is saying they are
working on it. But we don’t know what exactly is being done,” he said.
Journalist kidnapped in Syria messages her husband
Ankhar Kochneva, a Ukrainian journalist who went missing in Syria on October
10, contacted her relatives for the first time on Sunday, saying she hoped
everything would be fine and asking not to call her.
Kochneva’s ex-husband Dmitry Petrov told Russia’s Izvestia newspaper he had
received an SMS from the journalist’s phone number reading: “I hope for the
best. Don’t message me.”
A similar text was reportedly sent to one of her friends. In it Koncheva
also mentioned that she had been kidnapped.
The Russian embassy in Damascus has shown active support of Ukrainian
authorities in their search for the 40-year-old, who was believed to be an
active advocate of the Assad regime.
She was allegedly abducted by Syrian rebels in the outskirts of Homs.
Russian journalist Yelena Gromova confessed she and her close friend Ankhar
Koncheva often received threatening messages from the Moscow-based Syrian
opposition on social networking sites.
Ukrainian journalist kidnapped in Syria
Ankhar Kochneva, a journalist kidnapped in Syria, was a Ukrainian national,
said Sergei Marov, spokesman of the Russian embassy in Damascus.
“It’s become known to the Russian embassy that she was a citizen of Ukraine.
She wasn’t accredited to work here [in Syria],” he reported.
Mr. Markov said the Russian diplomatic mission was closely cooperating with
Ukrainian officials looking for the journalist.
Ankhar Kochneva went missing Friday. Her friend Darya Mitina said she was
last seen 20 kilometers from the city of Homs.
Voice
of Russia, RIA, Rosbalt, Interfax
14 December 2012, 17:49
Spying on Americans, trading liberty for security, the lady on Liberty
Island weeps
© Collage "The Voice of Russia"
The US continues to take away the liberties of American citizens and expand
the tools available to the already out-of-control police state to rule and
control the people with an iron fist. Not only have they now used the UN as
a tool to implement worldwide cyber surveillance but it is now legal for the
US to spy on the whole world and collect data on Americans who have nothing
to do with the terrorism and haven’t ever been criminals. The goal of a
recent meeting of the ICU behind closed doors was to implement tools to
allow easier global surveillance.
The NCTC has been spying on Americans since at least the beginning of 2012
and is being allowed to do so in the name of security and in protecting
Americans in the supposed “War on Terror”. Their access is almost completely
unhindered and unlimited in its scope, including government databases,
unhindered access to intelligence data, full access to commercial and
“private” data bases and company records and full monitoring of internet and
wireless communications. The only test for gathering and keeping the
information on any US citizen is “possible relevance” or “reasonable belief”
that the data may be connected to terrorism.
“A society that would give up liberty for security is deserving of neither
and will lose both.” Those words, spoken almost 300 years ago by US
statesman Benjamin Franklin, are as topical, if not more so today, as they
were in the context of 1759 America. Those words were a warning, one that
has been unheeded and ignored by the small circle of elites carrying out
their plans for a New World Order (NWO) that will effectively enslave each
and every one of us.
While the world, in particular those distracted and dumbed down by the
western corporate mass media, is fed round the clock coverage of what we all
know is set to be the next US resource invasion, namely Syria and the
further taking over of the Middle East, and the continuing endless “War on
Terror”; under the radar, the NWO proponents are actively taking away more
freedom and expanding their scope to a global level.
Vladimir Lenin said, “While the State exists, there can be no freedom. When
there is freedom there will be no State.” He was also said and understood
that “liberty is so precious that it must be rationed”, also ideas that are
as topical today as they were when he spoke them. The US State knows this
better than anyone, the paradigm being superimposed on the system the US
populace was taught to believe guaranteed freedom and equality, is
completely antithetical to those principles, leaving the populace forced to
adopt a paradoxical belief system, necessitating their dumbing down and the
propagation of the belief that their security is constantly under dire
threat.
Many of the tools being used to now expand and superimpose this paradigm of
a total and complete police state onto the world are right in front of you.
They include endless terror propaganda, complete state control of media and
mass communication to facilitate the distribution and manipulation of
information designed to allow them to meet their goals, tools to control and
limit the freedom of travel and movement, economic and financial
manipulation and the endless list of laws and tools limiting your freedom as
a sentient and wonderful human being.
This was to be an article on the spying on Americans by the National
Counterterrorism Center (NCTC) and the recent meeting of the United Nation’s
International Telecommunications Union (ITU) and the secret passing of the
Deep Packet Inspection Standard (DPI), and not a treatise on the enslavement
of mankind, but unfortunately the one requires the intelligent discussion of
the other, as they are completely interdependent.
For Americans who still held some sort of belief that they were not already
being spied on by the CIA, the NSA, the FBI or the DHS, this should serve as
a wakeup call, albeit one that is, for all intents and purposes much to late
in coming. The NCTC now officially has the right, after the implementation
of a document titled the “Guidelines for Access, Retention, Use and
Dissemination by the National Counterterrorism Center and other Agencies of
Information in Datasets Containing Non-Terrorism Information” to openly
collect, store and distribute any and all information on American citizens
that it wants, until the end of time.
In an article on the matter in the Wall Street Journal the former Chief
Privacy Officer at the US Department of Home Security, Mary Ellen Callahan,
in a “Situation Room” meeting at the White House protested the move stating:
"This is a sea change in the way that the government interacts with the
general public." Despite her concerns the Obama Administration backed the
move and the new guidelines were authorized. Due to her efforts Ms.
Callahan, just another in an almost endless list of Americans punished for
fighting for the rights of the American people, lost her job and is working
elsewhere .
The fact that the entire US Intelligence establishment can do whatever it
wants to non-US nationals worldwide, including droning and extra-judicial
execution is something no one bothers to talk about in the US but when the
same intrusive spying, classification, listing and surveillance occurs on
Americans then those who have not been terrorized and cowed into blind
obedience by the out-of-control-police-state, do still speak out and, as we
have seen repeatedly, do face the consequences for voicing their concerns.
Human nature, with all of its imperfections and perfections, incongruities
and valiant traits, is something that is not compatible with the complete
and total police state. Even the simple act of sharing, one of the nobler
traits of the human animal, is something that the police state has decided
they will not allow.
The necessity for total control is not for your well-being, nor for the
well-being being of your country, it is not even necessary for the continued
existence and propagation of the human race as a whole. It only serves the
interests of a very small group of elitists. Call them the 1%, the NOW, or
what have you, and their only goal is complete and total world domination.
This is one reason the internet, which was supposed to connect the free
world, has become at once the largest threat and the most vital asset. For
this reason: information activists, hackers, hacktivists, journalists,
bloggers and even programmers have become the biggest threats to the US
police state.
The total crackdown and use of the internet to spy on and attempt to control
the masses is something that many have been warning about for years, but few
listen.
We saw the total police state in action after the planned destruction of the
World Trade Center on the 11th of September 2001 and the almost complete and
total attempt by the US government to put in place a worldwide media
blackout on anyone who questioned the unbelievable official version of the
events of 9-11, and we have seen it since on an almost daily basis in case
after case. An iron-fist crackdown, arbitrary detention, persecution and
marginalization of anyone who threatens the criminal regime that usurped US
power after 9-11: Manning, Assange, Hammond, Doyon, 9,000 people who
disappeared after 9-11, Kelly, Tomlinson, Grabbe and hundreds of thousands
more including yours truly, all marginalized for seeking the truth and
attempting to expose the criminal regime that started at the Project for the
New Amercian Century and continues today.
As Vladimir Lenin said: “Politics begin where the masses are, not in places
where there are thousands but where there are millions, that is where
serious politics begin.” The internet is such a place. The US is confident
much of world has become enslaved to their computers, devices and the
internet but what will they do when the global population decides enough is
enough with the total control and just turn off?
The paradoxical nature of the internet may be the apotheosis of the human
condition, people who sought freedom naturally swarmed to it, as any
organism would flow to the path of least resistance. The internet was a
place where people thought they could be free, and as we saw above, freedom
and the state may be incompatible.
For the US police state the internet became an evil because it was being
used to expose the high-crimes of 9-11 and afterwards. Instead of cleaning
their own house and rewarding whistleblowers and truth seekers they decided
to go to war with you the people and destroy everyone and everything that
says their house in disorder.
Now the same internet and the massive surveillance establishment which has
been turned against the American people is to be turned on the rest of the
planet with the United Nations serving as the tool to bring that about. We
saw this with the United Nation’s International Telecommunications Union
recent secret meeting and we see this almost every day in myriad ways.
It seems fitting that the US Statue of Liberty was recently permanently
closed, now all they need to do is put a black gunny sack over her head and
dress her in an orange jumpsuit.
Americans continue to allow their government to do what it pleases. Should
the rest of the world? I hope not.
14 December 2012, 12:02
Indians were classified as wild animals - exclusive interview
© Flickr.com/Grand Canyon NPS/cc-by
The Voice of Russia discussed the real history of Thanksgiving and the true
history of the first relations between the American Indigenous peoples and
the European invaders with Dr. Daniel Paul an Indian Historian and elder
with the Mi'kmaq Nation. The secret hidden history of genocide, slavery and
treachery is touched upon and some surprising details are revealed, such as
the fact that the practice of scalping, began in Europe.
This is part 2 of a three part interview regarding American Indian History. You can find part 1 by clicking on this link: Dr.Daniel Paul Voice of Russia Interview Part 1. R
You can learn more about the Mi'kmaq and American Indians by visiting Dr.
Paul's website at: www.danielnpaul.com
13 December 2012, 20:32 Serbians paying for Albanian and Croatian war crimes - Stan Gasparovski
Photo: EPA
Recent biased rulings by the Hague, which have effectively freed known war
criminals, have caused widespread protests and anger among the population of
Serbia and Kosovo. Due to an ongoing media blackout in the country it is
extremely difficult for pro-Serbian groups to be heard, even when more than
5,000 people gather the Western Media does little to cover the events. In
this interview Stan Gasparovski, a writer, a Serbian protest organizer who
has formed a 15-group-union of pro-Serbian groups, the Vice President of an
organization called the Serbian Diaspora in the United Kingdom and the
former coordinator of the Committee for Peace in the Balkans, discussed the
current situation in Serbia and plans for continuing actions by pro-Serbian
groups.
10 December 2012, 19:30 1
Remember that MP3? The police are en-route
AFP PHOTO / CHICAGO POLICE DEPARTMENT
With the US ready to send Anonymous Hacktivist Jeremy Hammond to prison for
life, Jullian Assange stuck in limbo in an embassy, Commander X and
Anonymous members being hunted, is the world about to allow the US and its
surrogates to come after all of us? Apparently it is. The total enslavement
of mankind will soon be here, brought to you by the fascist United Corporate
States of America. Recently the International Telecommunications Union (ITU)
met in secret to decide on new ways to control the World Wide Web.
In a very quiet release of information the Internet Warriors and
“Hacktivist” Group Anonymous, has informed the world of one of the tools
that will be used to bring this about. If you have ever downloaded a song
for example, or transferred it to your cute little harmless looking MP3
player, or listened to it off a USB flash drive in your car, or copied it to
another computer, or God forbid, shared it with a friend, this applies to
you. You are a criminal, you have violated US law and they will come after
you.
The ITU was originally known as the International Telegraph Union a United
Nations agency responsible for controlling information and communication
technologies. The ITU’s activities include global coordination of the use of
the radio spectrum, cooperation in determining satellite orbits,
telecommunication infrastructure development in the developing world, and
assistance to countries in the development and coordination of worldwide
technical standards.
Their sphere of influence includes the entire planet and every user of the
World Wide Web is affected by their decisions, so it is alarming that they
would meet in secret and that the contents of their work would only be made
public via an Anonymous “secret document” release.
The technology that was approved and discussed at the conference and has
internet freedom proponents up in arms is called the Deep Packet Inspection
Standard (DPI), it is a crucially important technology for the mass
world-wide surveillance of the internet.
Some immediate uses of the DPI, according to the ITU and Anonymous include:
technology for tracking and identifying the users and sources of the
BitTorrent system (used for transferring films, programs, music and almost
anything else electronic), identifying and tracking copyrighted material
(including music, video, electronic books, photographs, etc.), identifying
the exact content and nature of transferred files and their source, blocking
and controlling Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) messages used in video and
audio communications uplinks, measuring and eventually controlling Jabber
traffic (In Spanish for some reason. Jabber was originally called Extensible
Messaging and Presence Protocol (XMPP) this is communications protocol for
message-oriented software based on XML Extensible Markup Language used
extensively by social networks VoIP communications and gaming traffic) and
finally identifying source and controlling VoIP itself (VoIP stands for
Voice over Internet Protocol), used in such things as voice communications
and SMS communications over the internet.
Without getting too technical, in brief this will make almost anything and
everything you do over the internet subject to even easier inspection and
monitoring and in the end prosecution by, (Who else?) the US and its
surrogates.
According to several hackers on Anonymous forums, the DPI will effectively
make it easier to monitor, prohibit, identify and control the net, and as
one individual put it “These standards would lower the learning curve for
the NOC (NOC stands for Network Operations Center, a location where a
network is monitored and controlled) monkeys considerably,” meaning their
knowledge of scripts and networking technology and other tools will have to
be much less.
We know that the World Wide Web was first developed to hide a global
military network which
still exists today and that one reason Bill Gates became so rich was that
his “Windows” platform, with its secret source code, contained secret
backdoors for the government which allows the spying on any computer
connected to the internet, so now this will be taken to the next level and
allow for them to openly go after anyone they see fit.
With the role of the US as the world’s policeman expanded so it is now an
out of control super-power unilaterally engaged in extra-judicial
executions, launching invasions at will and a million other practices that
subjugate and enslave the world, the day will soon come when: if a user in
Bora-Bora downloads an MP3, he may get a knock on the door, or perhaps he
will be fined on the spot and his bank account will be hit for the cost of
the “violation”.
If you say, “Hey, all my software is legal, so what?” you will need to worry
about everyone you come into contact with. What if someone sends you an
“illegal” attachment? You will be liable. What if someone you are talking to
on Skype mentions the words “president” and “bomb” in the same conversation?
You will be under surveillance. No matter where you are or who you happen to
be.
One telling aspect of the ITU’s meeting was the list of who was not allowed
to attend, according
to RT such
“deviant” organizations as Google, Facebook and Twitter, and what was not
allowed to be discussed; namely proposals from countries the world over who
will be affected by yet another unilateral US decision.
Apparently is it not enough for the US Government that Facebook was forced
to provide the CIA with its own special interface, they want more, they want
complete and total control of the entire pie.
In this day and age of continual aggressive invasions and the continued
distribution and attempted distribution of false information to facilitate
support for such heinous acts, the internet is the last resort for many the
world over to learn the truth about what is really happening. For Americans,
apart from foreign media, the internet is the only place where they can
actually learn what is really happening.
A government that is afraid of information being shared is a government that
is engaged in evil. They need to control you, because they are afraid of
you, they need to shut you down because they are afraid of what you might
learn, that what they are doing is illegal and that they are engaged in
crimes against all humanity.
Imagine a day when you attach a retinal scanner to your eye, and a device
reads the chip implanted in your skull before you log onto your computer, to
write a letter to your mother that may be rejected by Carnivore and the NSA
because you accidently wrote bomb and president in the same sentence.
Imagine you are then locked to your seat, by hidden steel restraints that
immobilize you so the authorities can come and take you away. Or imagine you
are sent a song and begin to listen only to have a warning pop up on the
screen advising you to stay where you are the copyright police are on the
way, sound fantastic? Not really just the next logical step.
Rather
than using encryption and other technologies to make file sharing impossible
they want to criminalize it, and more importantly, criminalize you, then
they will have the “right” to take away your freedom and whatever else you
have that they desire.
7 December 2012, 23:59
Syria: Iraq 2.0, another false-flag invasion, rated XXX
© Collage: The Voice of Russia
The US and NATO are set to invade Syria, something many of us have been
warning about for a while now. It has been obvious that they have been
looking for a pretext and that pretext has already been injected into the
public debate. That pretext: chemical weapons, revealed by Fox News and the
Director of the CIA, the same two sources that brought us all of the Iraq
invasion lies.
Sadly no matter how questionable or fabricated the pretext is, it appears
that there is nothing we can do except sit back and watch the US and its
surrogates invade and decimate yet another nation.
The whole Syrian scenario is right out of the Iraq-Afghanistan invasion
playbook. We know that the US and its surrogates, including NATO, Sunni Arab
partners and Israel, are all waiting for a pretext and preparing for an
invasion of Syria and Iran. They want to invade for resources and
pre-planned geopolitical goals, this is a given, the only problem is there
has not been enough of a reason to, until now. Thanks to whom? Once again,
Fox News.
Beginning with the events of 9-11, the catalyst for the Project for the New
American Century’s plans for global military domination, up until today, we
have seen the US run rampant all over the world invading, killing, droning,
assassinating and over-turning governments at will.
It began with Afghanistan, a country that had no connection to 9-11. We now
know they knew that and invaded anyway. It was their plan and they
manipulated the media to bring it about. A plan spearheaded by Fox News,
which also helped the neo-conservatives usurp the office of the US
Presidency to install George Bush, the spread lies and disinformation
connecting Afghanistan to 9-11 so the American people would sheepishly
goose-step alongside those hungering for war.
Claims connecting Afghanistan to 9-11 were later found to be false but that
has not mattered. An invasion is an invasion, it doesn’t matter to the US
how many brown people they kill in Afghanistan on false claims. This act of
aggressive war was a crime against humanity, but no one will ever be brought
to justice and no one will ever dare to prosecute.
Iraq was not connected to 9-11 either, but the US tried to claim they were.
Hussein never allowed al-Qaeda to operate in Iraq. That claim did not work,
so the US cooked up the whole Yellowcake story, claiming Iraq was attempting
to produce nuclear weapons. That was found to have been a lie too. Fox News
was on
the job there too.
Then there was the 45-minute WMD lie. These lies were even presented to the
United Nations and repeated over and over again by Fox News and US
Officials. Even the Director of the CIA knowingly promoted a lie and was
forced to resign. But apparently Americans have forgotten all of that.
Iraq was nothing
but lies,
Hussein’s only real crime was the fact that they day before the invasion he
changed Iraqi oil trade and foreign hard currency reserves from the dollar
to the Euro and was not as pliable as the US had wanted. Something few
people have chosen to remember but a very key fact. Remember the weather
balloon trailers and the Iraq chemical weapons lie? Fox News broadcast that
so much that even when it was known to be a lie it was almost accepted
truth.
The aggressive invasion of Iraq and the execution of its leaders was also a
crime against humanity for which no one has had to answer for. Another war
crime and crime against all civilized people all over the world is the
“terror” prison at Guantanamo Bay Cuba. It is a place to keep and torture
men who were defending their families and homes from foreign invaders who
wanted nothing but to rape their countries of its resources and rob its
people the right to self-determination.
The continued dronings and extra-judicial executions, the daily kill lists,
the manipulation and over-throwing of governments, the list goes on and on.
These are all war crimes and crimes against all of humanity, for which no
one has yet been prosecuted and which no country is seemingly able to stop.
Then of course we had Muammar Gaddafi and all of the lies associated with
the invasion and destruction of that country with thousands more dead at the
hands of the US and its NATO lap dogs, another place where resources were
needed and another leader who stopped trading oil in dollars.
Where did it all start? Yugoslavia and the invasion and genocide on the
Serbs, also an invasion based on lies for which no has ever paid a price.
Yugoslavia was the litmus test for the West and its
“resource-and-geopolitical-plan” invasions. Had they been stopped there the
world would be a different place today.
The United States has been usurped by madmen and lunatic killers bent on
forcing the entire planet to its knees by force. Maybe those are strong
words but that is the truth. Just like a brutal cop who murders and then
places a cold gun in his dead victim’s hand, the US is rolling through the
world like a cancer, killing and invading at will. They will invade Syria
and Iran, and then like that cop, come up with the reason later, and like
that cop they must be stopped.
We know, without a shadow of a doubt that the US will lie about and produce
“evidence” of anything under the sun if it will allow them to carry out
their military adventures. Then why should we be surprised by or believe
anything they say now with regards to Syria, in particular the claim that
President Bashar al-Assad has chemical weapons.
The US has long ago lost any and all credibility and needs to be locked in a
padded cell and have all of its weapons removed forcibly before it kills any
more people.
Unless one is suffering from loss of long term memory all of the above facts
should be enough to cause alarm, and the hairs on the back of the neck to
stand on end when a “news” outlet like Fox News, which has lied and lied
again, tells the world Syria has chemical
weapons.
War lie, invasion to come.
When it comes to the lies on Syria, well they
have been going on for years. We
just learned that Egypt Air resumed flights into Damascus because they found
out all of the reports of violence around the international airport were
lies.
The fact that slimy looking Leon Panetta, dressed in his thousand dollar
mafia-thug suit, gets in front of a microphone trying to look all worried
while having trouble making his eyes meet the reporters, as he states he is
“concerned the regime might very well consider the use of
chemical weapons,”
just doesn’t get it. Where is the proof? That is what the international
community should be asking, and if the US is lying, yet again, which I am
sure it is, the world needs to seriously look at ways of disarming the most
dangerous aggressor on the planet.
So as the US media attempts to plant the gun, US troops are being amassed
on the
Syrian border readying
for an invasion of Syria, NATO agrees to “augment
Turkey’s air-defences,” the
invasion of Iran also appears
to be closer.
NATO has officially entered
the Syrian crisis and
even Germany has signed up for yet more mindless US
led bloodshed.
Syria itself has denounced NATO’s actions and U.S. and German statements.
UPI Asia reports that Syrian Deputy Foreign Minister Faisal Miqdad said,
"Syria stresses again, for the 10th, the 100th time, that if we had such
(chemical) weapons, they would not be used against its people. We
would not commit suicide."
Fox needs to do better than citing "unnamed senior officials" to allow the
US to fulfill its dream of punishing President Assad. As U.S. President
Barack Obama said that the use of chemical weapons by the Syrian authorities
will serve as a "red line" which, if crossed, will be followed by the
“punishment” of President Bashar al-Assad.
Is the world going to sit by as the out of control American killing machine
comes up with yet another false pretext to invade yet another country,
decimate its population and assassinate its leader? Is there anything the
world can do?
Sadly, it looks like the answer to that question is no. Should we do
something? Absolutely, but it may be too late.
7 December 2012, 18:22
UPDATE: 13 days, 20 hours to the end of the world
© Flickr.com/AidanJones/cc-by-nc-sa 3.0
The Mayan Calendar will not end on December 21, 2012 at 11:11GMT, the
calendar is simply to be reset to begin the next cycle called the 14th
baktun, marked by the end date of the 13th baktun or 13.0.0.0.0. All over
the world people are predicting cataclysmic events yet there is almost no
scientific evidence pointing to anything extraordinary that is supposed to
occur. However, just in case we are keeping an “eye on the world” for you.
Australian Prime Minister Julia Gillard is the latest to predict horrors,
read on to find out what.
Australian Prime Minister Julia Gillard, known for unapologetically making
statements not entirely in keeping with the truth (e.g. Julian Assange’s
activities), has come out and stated what many the world over are afraid to
say. Yes, according to Gillard the world will in fact end on December 21,
2012.
In a video address to the citizens of Australia which has gone viral
on the internet Gillard
warns that the end is near and that it may come from unexpected sources:
Gillard: My dear remaining fellow Australians, the end of the world is
coming. It wasn’t Y2K, it wasn’t even the carbon price. It turns out that
they Mayan calendar was true. While Australia’s best and brightest at the
SCIRO have not been able to confirm this, I am confident in Triple J’s
prediction that the world is about to end. Whether the final blow comes from
flesh eating zombies, demonic hell beasts or from the total triumph of
K-pop, if there is one thing that you know about me it’s this: I will always
fight for you till the very end. And at least this mean I will not have to
do Q and A again. Good luck to you all.
I wonder what Julian Assnage would say to her claims that she will fight for
all Australians to the end, but that is another story.
Gillard is not alone, even respected meteorologists, such as Cleveland
Ohio’s channel 5 Chief Meteorologist
Mark Johnson,
are predicting the end is almost here, his weather forecast for the days
after the 21st of December are alarming. On Saturday December 22nd, Mr.
Johnson says the temperature will be 150 degrees, on Sunday December 23rd
420 degrees and on Monday 512 degrees, and this is in Fahrenheit. According
to Mr. Johnson Tuesday will see the beginning of a cooling trend with cooler
temperatures of around minus 52 and on Wednesday down to minus 90.
Meanwhile police in Shanghai have been warning residents the world will not
end, obviously in an attempt to keep the masses in check so they will all
die peacefully and not cause too much work for the police who will be busymaking
their own preparations.
The Communist Chinese conspiracy to lull the masses into obedience is also
being promoted and assisted by the USspace
agency NASA at
the direction of the Illuminati and New World Order, who know the world will
end and want us all to die so they can be rid of us because the world does
not have the resources to continue supporting 9 billion humans.
Meanwhile the US is surrounding Syria with warships and mobilizing troops to
invade the country and then Iran, which will kick off World War III and the
Holy War of Armageddon and the battle for Jerusalem and Israel as is
prophesized in the Bible, a book the US has been using as a basis for its
foreign policy.
We are still waiting for Satan to reveal himself, one of the key signs of
the Apocalypse. Rumor has it that it may be a former US vice president or
secretary of state, but so far there are no concrete reports.
In West Hollywood California, another serious location we must watch, end
of the
world parties are being planned,
sponsored by the local government (also privy to secret Illuminati
knowledge), encouraging people to meet California’s slide into the Pacific
Ocean with drink and song, while they secretly escape in their rescue pods.
Seriously though, one more time I would like to repeat: the Mayan Calendar
is not ending! December 21, 2012 is only the end of the 13th Baktun and the
beginning of the 14th . See you on the 22nd.
Previous article regarding the December 21, 2012 End of the World belief.
6 December 2012, 22:32
President Putin protects Russian interests: West displeased
© Collage: The Voice of Russia
After 19 years being denied entry into the WTO the West thought Russia would
be a pushover once allowed in the “club.” Unfortunately for the West while
they have been slipping further and further into an economic abyss of their
own making, Russia has been growing economically, independent of the WTO.
The West did not take serious repeated Russian statements that Russia would
protect its interests while following WTO rules, they should have listened
because in reality, Russia needs the WTO less than they need Russia.
Sadly it was to be expected but the total lack of respect not only for
Russia as a country but again towards the President of the Russian
Federation is enough to cause rage.
Many in the West were expecting that the entry of the Russia Federation into
the World Trade Organization would mean huge profits and trade that would be
unilaterally beneficial and allow them to make billions while dumping goods
into the country of questionable quality and origin.
Again, sadly, they were expecting a country that was pliant and easy to
manipulate and due to Russia’s almost 19 year battle to join the
organization believed Russia would be the new kid on the block and a
pushover, of course ignoring the repeated statements by Russian Officials
that Russia would follow WTO rules and laws but would protect the interests
of Russian companies and Russian consumers. Well Russia has done just that,
and many in the West are not pleased.
The biased Western Press has jumped all over disagreements between the
Russian Federation and has portrayed Russia as somehow being unfair and
unjust and of course the media bias towards Russia is clear.
One media outlet in the West, the Financial Times, has had a long history of
publishing unbalanced anti-Russian articles and has gone from one extreme to
the other depending on which way the wind blows as long as the wind is
carrying dirt onto Russia’s image.
In January of this year the Financial Times published a provocative piece
titled “Nationalist‘
ghost at feast’ in Russia”claiming
the opposition was being led by neo-nazi extremists. Their apologetic
attitude towards convicted neo-nazis and nationalists is a matter worth
further research, but for now suffice it to say that at the time the
nationalists were against the government and a leading force in the
opposition, according to the Financial Times
Now 11 months later, the Financial Times, in another article titled “Russian
Justice” says
that President Putin is somehow using nationalism himself and this time it
is a bad thing. So when nationalism is used against President Putin it is
good and when it is supposedly used by President Putin it is bad and once
again used as another tool to take stabs at the president. You can’t have it
both ways.
Let me get back to the issue of the WTO and on another article by the
Financial Times on that matter, as well as the views of many in Europe on
Russian-European WTO disagreements as reflected in the Western Press. An
article titled “Europe cools on Russia’s WTO accession” published today by
the above organization is biased in many ways although it does cite
officials and gives a basically sound argument the article is lacking in
that it does not present all of the facts and does not present a fair
portrait of the Russian side of the equation. The article also attempts to
demean Vladimir Putin in the disrespectful tone that it speaks about the
elected President of the Russian Federation.
The Financial Times and publications such as the Wall Street Journal are
many times right on the front lines of demonizing Russia and President Putin
for the sole reason that they serve the interests of the West and in
particular and most importantly the serve the interests of big western money
and that is what it is all about, the bottom line if you will.
President Putin has been a target of the West almost since day one. Why?
Well the exact reasons are many and varied but in a nutshell because he has
almost single-handedly pulled Russia up by its bootstraps, right out of the
very depths of the hellacious-hell-of-near-anarchy that existed when he took
office. That is a fact almost anyone would agree with. That’s number one.
Why did this upset the West? Well because after the collapse of the Soviet
Union, as the old saying goes, to the victor were supposed to go the spoils.
After the collapse the West had
plans in place,
ala Zbigniew Brzezinski, to divide and conquer, in particular the United
States, a country founded on the genocide and stealing of the lands of the
Indians, and these plans were completely and totally obliterated by Vladimir
Putin. Much to the chagrin of the West President Putin has continued to
protect and advance the interests of Russia and the Russian people, again,
not good for the West.
Back to the article:
taking no issue with the pompous grandstanding of the European Union trade
commissioner, Karel De Gucht, and his threats against Russia that the clock
is ticking and his almost open calls for a “Showdown at the O.K. Corral”
against Vladimir Putin, the article is revealing in the attitude many in the
West have as to their false perceptions of what Russia’s real posture should
be when it comes to the WTO and what they really think about the Russian
Federation.
The European optimism that the Financial Times claims has left Europe was
only there for those who believed that a huge opportunity for exploitation
had opened up. Sorry, not going to happen. People forget that Russia has
shown positive economic growth on all fronts during the global economic
crisis and has grown stronger economically as the world slides further and
further into the economic abyss, and for all intents and purposes, Russia
does not really need the WTO.
Issues that the WTO members have been upset about include dumping cheap
genetically modified products onto the Russian market, sending Russian
livestock that does not meet Russian standards, and lo-and-behold Russia has
concerns about its ecology? Well imagine that.
The Financial Times claims Russia had “… entered the WTO without a clear
idea of why it wants to belong to this club and it has no intention of
participating in negotiations to free up trade, the prime purpose of the
WTO.” Not true, Russia knew exactly why it wanted to enter the WTO and
unfortunately those in the West were sadly mistaken when they believed the
new kid on the block would be a pushover.
According to the Financial Times De Gucht also said “EU officials would
demand answers when they stand ‘eyeball to eyeball’ with the Russian
president during the summit” and that, “… he would be very interested to
learn from Mr. Putin himself what he has on his mind.”
Perhaps Mr. De Gucht is going to learn the hard way that when push comes to
shove, Russia just might shove right back, a wee tad harder than they could
have possibly imagined.
5 December 2012, 16:31
NATO in the process of surrounding China - interview
© Collage: Voice of Russia
5 December 2012, 14:42
Mixed signals from European Union on economic blockade of WikiLeaks -
spokesperson
Photo: AFP
WikiLeaks number two and the official spokesperson for the WikiLeaks
organization, Kristinn Hrafnsson spoke with the Voice of Russia regarding
the recent ruling by the European Parliament regarding the extra-judicial
economic blockade by US based financial institutions who are in violation of
international and European law in their continued blockade of the
organization. Mr Hraffnsson also spoke about Bradley Manning equating his
detention to torture and when asked about WikiLeaks, promised more releases
to come.
4 December 2012, 18:37
Russia is closed for you Mr. Harding
© Flickr.com/reinvented/cc-by-nc-sa 3.0
The UK’s Guardian is in our sights as this week’s most anti-Russian biased
media outlet in the world. Once again we see Russia demonized and tired cold
war stereotypes and fears brought out to this time attack people who are
doing their most to improve relations between the United Kingdom and the
Russian Federation. A Russian
Embassy response,
a writer who
has been barred from entering Russia in the past and a newspaper with
questionable motives are all part of this week’s media-bias counter bias
report.
Hello dear reader, it has been a while since we looked at Western
anti-Russian media bias, by no means is this because it has become less, it
has in fact, become more widespread and even bolder. Unfortunately I have
been busy covering other subjects and fulfilling other duties but this
screams for attention and as the saying goes the squeaky wheel gets the
grease.
This week I would like to take a look at a smear campaign
being carried out by the UK’s Guardian against Russia,
the elected president of the Russian Federation Vladimir Putin, the Russian
Embassy in London and a UK political group called Conservative Friends of
Russia.
When the subject first came to my attention my first question was why? There
is always a reason for everything and my article is no exception. I am
interested in getting the truth out and countering lies, I think everything
I have ever written would back that up, and I am not afraid to call a spade
a spade when the case in question calls for it. In this case the “why”
appears to be gratuitous pandering to the anti-Russian sentiments of many of
the Guardian's readers and Russophobes worldwide in an attempt to increase
the publication’s readership.
The author of the article in question, one Luke Harding, has made a career
of demonizing Russia. To the right of his columns deriding Russia, the
Guardian shamelessly hawks his latest work, “Mafia State: How one reporter
became an enemy of the brutal new Russia”, a book they published themselves
and which claims to prove its title with US diplomatic cables released by
WikiLeaks. As if the Russophobic US State Department is somehow a reliable
un-biased source capable of honestly assessing their self-declared
geo-political enemy.
If all of that was not bad enough it gets worse. Mr.
Harding was not allowed to enter Russia,
and had his visa revoked on arrival and was immediately sent back to London
due to a lack of credentials as a journalist and according to the Russian
Internal Ministry for: “… a series of violations of the rules concerning
foreign correspondents which were approved by the Government of the Russian
Federation in 1994 and are well known to all journalists"
Mr. Harding obviously suffers from a delusional architecture full of spies
and persecution by the “KGB” and that everything Russian is somehow evil and
controlled by omnipotent evil dark forces. This is evident even in the
portrayal of his denial of entry into Russia. He paints a picture of being
deported unfairly as if he became an “enemy of the state”, while
conveniently omitting the fact that he was in violation of many Russian laws
and rules including being in an area where anti-terrorist operations were
taking place without permission.
The fact that his delusions of persecution are real might be backed up by
the fact that even the Foreign Minister of the Russian Federation publicly
stated in an interview with the BBC that Mr. Harding is welcome back in
Russia when he gets his documents in order and that his accreditation was
waiting for him to come and pick it up.
Harding maintaining his “legend” of persecution by Russia is something that
he needs to do to keep his readers believing what he writes and helps the
Guardian sell papers, which is what it is all about for the Guardian.
For an organization such as the Guardian and a writer such as Mr. Harding,
who needs Cold War thinking and Russophobia to continue in order to remain
relevant, it is then obvious why they have chosen to attack the way they
have.
It is sad that such people would attack a group such as the Conservative
Friends of Russia, who were interested in advancing and promoting positive
ties between the two countries. Yet for someone who wants to paint Russia as
being evil and anyone who wants to advance anything positive with regard to
Russia as being manipulated by the evil non-existent “KGB”, the choice of
attack was obvious.
Let’s look at the article
in question,
obviously written for the gullible and easily influenced: namely tose who
would not see through the attempt to paint a picture not keeping with
reality, or in keeping with a reality they themselves have created, are you
with me? It begins with a provocative headline: “How Kremlin got diplomats
to woo Tories”, obviously the Guardian does not support the Tories, and
shows a picture of two young serious looking men, one of them Sergey Nalobin
the First Secretary of the Russian Embassy’s Political Section, who the
Guardian takes issue with because they claim “Nalobin's father was a
high-ranking officer in the FSB, Vladimir Putin's spy service.”
Okay stop. First off since when does what one’s father did affect what ones
does now. The Guardian obviously wants to portray the fact that his father
was in the Federal Security Service (FSB) as something evil and that as a
result the son is just some sort of puppet. Calling the FSB “Vladimir
Putin's spy service” is also ridiculous, as if President Putin created it
and owns it. Maybe Mr. Harding would tell us what his father did and we
could ponder his credibility as a “journalist”.
Mr. Harding continues his attack on Sergey Nalobin by writing a paragraph on
his father and attempts to portray something sinister in the fact that he
achieved a high position in the FSB. Harding keeps repeating Alexander
Litvinenko so much that he gives the impression he really believes that that
is all that the FSB is about. Lest Harding not be aware, the FSB is a part
of the government of the biggest country in the world and it is charged with
guaranteeing the security of the Russian Federation, due to this its roles
are extremely diversified and widespread. Their jurisdiction does not
include Britain or territories outside the Russian Federation except for the
exception of hot pursuits of terrorists and they can not operate outside of
Russia. Also for Mr. Harding the Border Service, which revoked your visa and
“deported” you are under the FSB, but this does not mean you are being
persecuted by the FSB.
Mr. Harding continues in the same vein saying Sergey Nalobin’s brother was
FSB and throwing President Putin into the mix because he was the head of the
FSB. Apparently and it is really sad, Harding and many of his audience and
editors believe the FSB is some evil organization due to their xenophobia.
The FSB, MI-6, the CIA, Mossad and other intelligence agencies all work to
promote their country’s interests and guarantee the security of their
citizens and respective motherlands, this is normal and as it should be. Why
then is it that any connection with the FSB is seen as something evil by the
West.
Why isn’t the same standard used regarding, for example, US president’s ties
to the CIA? Those are enough to fill volumes, or British politician’s ties
to MI-5/6, those would also be worth noting if we wanted to engage in
similar attack journalism. Should we all assume now that every British
functionary at the embassy here in Moscow is working for MI-6, or at the US
Embassy for the CIA?
I personally find offensive Harding’s portrayals of Russia, Russian
diplomats, the Russian President, the Russian people and the FSB and would
ban him from ever entering Russia if I could. This is not the first time his
bias has entered the cross-hairs. The FSB is an honorable organization whose
members follow the law and the constitution to the letter and take their
oaths seriously, it members rarely seek recognition for their deeds and
their successes are rarely ever heard about, it is offensive that a hack
like Harding can be allowed to disgrace and vilify anything he wants because
it sells some papers.
The Russian Embassy in London published a response to the article in
question, the following is an excerpt, challenging the Guardian to publish
their response:
“We are well aware of the existing bias, instincts and prejudices of some
who would like any progress in our relationship to wait for the moment when
we see eye to eye on issues of democratic development. Such an approach
smacks of self-righteousness. Do we need to say that no country is now in
good shape in terms of economy, fiscal situation, state of democracy,
quality of political elites and, finally, the media? Russia is also far from
perfect, and whatever problems we have we are willing to discuss those with
our partners, including the British. That is, in fact, done at all levels.
After all, Russia, naturally, is in a momentous transition, sort of goods in
process, not finished goods in a state of end of history rot. We don’t claim
moral high ground, but ask for a reasoned debate.”
“Since the state of the British media is a topical issue, it would be only
fair to say that Britain’s international partners have a huge interest in
their health, Russia being no exception. We did have those problems with the
British mainstream press in the past.”, the
Embassy of the Russian Federation in UK’s website says.
“We hope, the media, the Fourth Estate will exercise its freedom responsibly
for the good of Great Britain and its international relationships which are
a major source of economic growth and prosperity in our interdependent
world. Hopefully, the blame for parts of British media’s blatant disregard
for common decency won’t be put at our Embassy’s door.”
Protests against Hague decision to free war criminals to be held in Serbia -
interview
© Flickr.com/ekenitr/cc-by-nc
Download audio file MOVED HERE http://www.jar2.com/Interviews/Sandra_Davidovic.html
Sandra Davidovic, a student in the political science faculty at Belgrade
University, spoke with the Voice of Russia regarding protests being planned
for today.
4 December 2012, 10:03
Democracy existed in the Americas long before the Europeans invaded -
Mi'kmaq Elder
Photo: AFP
An elder with the Mi'kmaq Nation, Dr. Daniel Paul, spoke with the VoR and
revealed some of the true yet hidden history of the American Indian people,
few of whom remain after the worst genocide in the history of all mankind.
The Indians of the Americas practiced Democracy for centuries before the
Europeans invaded and even the US Constitution was written based on Indian
principles. The Indian people were a peaceful people who lived lives based
on honor, mutual respect and reverence for the land.
This rare interview may give you a glimpse into a once proud and great
nations, which are now gone.
You can learn more about the Mi'kmaq and American Indians by visiting Dr.
Paul's website at: www.danielnpaul.com
30 November 2012, 08:20
NATO controlling Turkish missile batteries - interview
Photo: EPA
Regular Voice of Russia contributor Rick Rozoff, the owner of Stop NATO
International, once again made sense of the plans and activities of the NATO
Alliance and gave his candid and frank views as to the intentions and plans,
already in place by NATO, to secure uncontested and permanent military
domination of the entire planet. As NATO continues its stealthy global
expansion, Rick as always, has his eye on the ball.
John
Robles
27 November 2012, 19:30
‘US right-wing censoring world media’ - WikiLeaks
MOVED HERE http://www.jar2.com/Topics/WikiLeaks.html
In a statement released by WikiLeaks Julian Assange said: “There is no
sovereignty without economic sovereignty. Hard-right elements in the United
States have been able to pressure VISA and MasterCard, who together hold
monopoly over the European market, into introducing a blockade that the U.S.
Treasury has rightly rejected. These unaccountable elements are directly
interfering in the political and economic freedoms of EU consumers and are
setting a precedent for political censorship of the world's media.”
25 November 2012, 08:15
Racism Australian style, or freedom of speech?
Photo: AFP
Racism and Aboriginal rights are still a very real and acute problem in
Australia. Recently Australia has passed a ruling which many “racist
elements” see as a threat to their “free speech” in attacking and demonizing
the already marginalized and vulnerable Aboriginal people for their own
political ends. In reality the ruling was a small victory, but in a land
where not long ago it was legal to kill the indigenous people, it has had a
resounding resonance, even making it into the Russian language press.
The decimated Aboriginal population of Australia recently won a very small
battle which has brought their struggle to the forefront, albeit on a small
scale, and has many in Australia debating journalistic ethics, freedom of
speech and just how far can politicians go to pander to the racist
sentiments of their supporters when attacking vulnerable marginalized
minorities.
The “victory” in question is a case regarding hate speech which the side of
the perpetrator is trying to portray as a freedom of speech issue and deals
with just how far Australians are allowed to go when expressing their hatred
or making offensive statements about the Aboriginal peoples of Australia and
other non-white non-Christian groups.
Nine indigenous Australians filed a complaint in Federal Court against a
columnist for the Herald Sun named Andrew Bolt who was then found guilty of
violating Australia’s anti-discrimination laws. More specifically breaching
section 18 (c) of Australia’s Racial Discrimination Act of 1975.
The case against him include stating that the nine had “identified as
Aborigines in order to gain career, social or other advantage” in two
articles published in 2009 and two blog posts on the Herald Sun’s website,
one titled “It’s so hip to be black.”
Australia, a country where not long ago it was legal to kill Aborigines and
take their children away has a very long way to go towards becoming a fair
society. Like most of the countries invaded, colonized or taken possession
of during the days of the British Empire and the European invasion of the
“New World,” countries and lands where the native peoples were brutally
exterminated, Australia is ruled and populated by the ancestors of genocidal
outcasts and the murderous misfits of European, in this case British
society. So watching their system attempt to show that they are just is
almost laughable, if it were not so tragic.
Despite the weakness of Australian anti-discrimination laws, as it true in
many countries ruled along racial lines, Australia also has laws to
“protect” free speech and “freedom of expression,” in this case Section 18D
of the same Racial Discrimination Act which allows for exemptions when done
“reasonably and in good faith” including public comments in a newspaper.
Such laws and arguments, as in the United States, allow for hate groups and
those espousing hate to operate, for the most part, unhindered by the law.
As with the US Ku Klux Klan, a group whose only goal is white domination
through the killing and eradication of other races, and neo-Nazi groups
worldwide who are allowed in many countries to march and hold public
gatherings under the protection of governments, Australia’s racists also
hide behind the banner of freedom of expression.
Watching the farce of the white justice system attempting to show it is
fair, as it rules against its own, is usually saddening and mostly
predictable, and this time is no different. The fact that it took four
publications and nine plaintiffs to bring about a grudging ruling in this
case says a lot for the fairness of the Australian system and the attitudes
of white Australians to the issue of the rights of the marginalized natives
of the country they have occupied for hundreds of years.
The reaction by the Australian media, such as the newspaper and website
The Australian and
powerful politicians who were given positions of power by millions of
like-minded voters, in
this case Australian Representative Tony Abbott,
is also a sad reminder as to how racist the system is and how many millions
still support and hold extreme racist views.
In the United States, Canada, Europe and other countries, racists and hate
groups have made huge gains over the last 20 years. In particular
Republicans and the far-right in US who have for the most part succeeded in
overturning gains made during the civil rights era. This has for the most
part been helped by Islamaphobia, crack downs on civil rights and freedoms
and the ensuing battle for “freedom of expression and “equal rights for
whites” which have been used as tools to rewrite laws and restructure the
white supremacist system in subtle and far reaching ways.
A good indicator that institutionalized racism is worldwide problem is the
case of Anders Breivik in Norway who despite his heinous crimes enjoys a
suite of rooms and superior treatment for the sole reason that he was
fighting for the white race, no matter that he is a mass-murdering lunatic.
Back to the matter at hand: Australia has one of the longest and most brutal
histories of genocide, racial hatred and institutionalized discrimination
and has only recently begun to correct some of the wrongs in the system.
Advocates of Aboriginal rights believe Australia’s Racial Discrimination Act
is worth defending, especially in light of the fact that there still exist
extreme levels of hatred, along racial, ethnic and religious lines in
Australia.
In an article for ABC Australia Mariam
Veiszadeh, a lawyer, writer and community rights advocate says,
“(Australia’s) … politicians feel the need to score political points at the
expense of the most vulnerable members of Australian society.” With regard
to freedom of speech she says: “Freedom of speech and expression is
inevitably a double edged sword. While it is very much the cornerstone of
our democratic rights and freedoms, those who spew hateful and misleading
vitriol ultimately thrive from the protection it offers.”
Though expectedly demonized by many “Australians,” last year Australia’s
Attorney-General Nicola Roxon, as reported by Mariam Veiszadeh: “…launched a
public discussion paper to seek community views on consolidating
Commonwealth anti-discrimination law as part of Australia's Human Rights
Framework."
Although Australia’s anti-discrimination laws are minimal and need to be
strengthened the Attorney General has faced harsh criticism and attacks for
her fight for justice. In the same article in The
Australian that I mentioned above,
the “freedom of speech” argument is blatantly and inaccurately put forward
once again with the publication defending hate speech by politicians by
stating incorrectly as fact that Attorney-General Nicola Roxon's proposed
changes: expand the list of things people can be offended by, expand the
jurisdiction into shops, workplaces and sporting clubs, provide a new weapon
in the war on free speech, include "political opinion" as a ground on which
people can be discriminated against and make “even innocuous political
expressions subject to the law.”
The nine “fair-skinned Aboriginals'' as they are being called in the
Australian all were carefully targeted for the smear by Bolt. They are all
high-achieving Aboriginals who have in various ways advanced the struggle of
the Aboriginal people and this is something that racist elements in
Australian want to see stopped.
Their claim that their attack was exempt from prosecution because it was
free speech was shot down by Justice Mordecai Bromberg who cited the way the
"articles were written, including that they contained errors of fact,
distortions of the truth and inflammatory and provocative language."
In the verdict which Justice Bromberg read out in court he stated that he
had found that "fair-skinned Aboriginal people (or some of them) were
reasonably likely, in all the circumstances, to have been offended,
insulted, humiliated or intimidated by the imputations conveyed in the
newspaper articles."
According to the Australian after the proceedings the author Bolt said “This
is a terrible day for freedom of speech in this country'', and the author of
the article, the director of the Legal Rights Project, Simon Breheny said:
“We've already seen the consequences of the Racial Discrimination Act for
freedom of speech. If you thought that was a miscarriages of justice, just
wait until you see the extraordinary wave of free speech litigation Roxon's
new laws will unleash.” I would argue his own statement is an admission and
a clear affirmation that widespread racism is a very serious problem in
Australia.
Unfortunately for Australian racists Australia’s genocide of the Aborigines
was not as complete as the American genocide of the Indian Nations and the
Aboriginal people still exist in numbers large enough to allow them to
occasionally be heard. This is also due to Australia’s policy of
extermination through assimilation as opposed to the US policy of outright
genocide and the following ghettoizing of the Indian people to reservations.
Few, if any, full-blooded Aboriginals in Australia are allowed to advance to
the levels that the nine defendants in this case have lifted themselves up
to, and we see that this has caused resonance. As with America most people
who posses Aboriginal or native blood are supposed to hide that fact and
quietly live under subjugation, these nine too often stepped-out-of-line,
and were therefore attacked.
Most people of native origin, if living among the “broader” populations of
their respective invaded lands, are taught to hide their ancestry, as were
the Jews during the Great Patriotic War, and any other groups living
surrounded by the “enemy.” Like my father once told me in California, where
our family was attacked by skin-heads, when I found out our hidden family
history and that I am more than 40% Taino Indian, “It is a white man’s
world. We have to live by his rules.”
Yes, Australia, most of the Americas, and many other places are now a “white
Anglo Saxon man’s world,” but the fact is that those “worlds” were stolen.
Let this serve as a warning to all Russians and nations of the world to be
forever vigilant to encroachment on your peoples and your lands.
The opinions and views expressed here are the writer’s own. He can be
reached at jar2@list.ru.
22 November 2012, 23:58
Thanksgiving is a day of mourning for Native Americans
Photo: EPA
Had the Nazis won the Great Patriotic War and succeeded in exterminating the
Jews and the “mud people”, as they are called in Mein Kampf, and achieved
their dream of a great Aryan city where the “mud people” were paraded in
front of their Aryan masters every day to pay tribute (also detailed in Mein
Kampf), and then after the passing of time had created a holiday
commemorating their friendship with the Jews and the “mud people” they had
exterminated, you would have an analogous celebration to the American
“holiday” of Thanksgiving.
As a Taino Indian, a subgroup of the Arawak Nation, I feel it my
responsibility to inform people as to the real meaning of this “holiday”. My
people were also exterminated as were our northern brothers, as were our
western and southern brothers. For many Indians this day is the same as if
the Jews celebrated the holocaust.
In the US Thanksgiving is a day when people feast on turkey, cranberry
sauce, stuffing, yams (or sweet potatoes) and many other things. For most
common Americans who believe the official version of the origins of the
holiday it is a day of friendship between the Native Americans and the white
“Pilgrims” as they called themselves. It is a day when families get together
and spend the entire day eating and gorging themselves on the many beautiful
foods that are native only to North America. However the true history of
Thanksgiving is much blacker and bloodier and is only remembered by Native
Americans and very few others.
The American Indians of today are a marginalized section of American
society, who are kept isolated and with little communication or contact with
the outside world. They are hidden away like skeletons in the closet of
American society, a country founded a little over 200 years ago, on the
genocide of the Indian people and developed and founded on their blood and
by the labor of black slaves.
Imagine if you will for a moment that Hitler had won World War II,
unthinkable, but for the sake of argument picture that for a minute. The
Nazis were responsible for the killing of, what may have been up to 40
million Russian and Soviet citizens, as records were sometimes impossible to
keep at that time the exact number will never be known. Now imagine they had
won and in 200 years we celebrated a day when the Nazis forced the Russians
to bring them food, killed one of their leaders and raped their women and
children, unthinkable again, but for the American Indians that is exactly
what Thanksgiving is.
At the time written records were not kept, the Indians passed along their
history by word of mouth, in the retelling of stories, or by other less
dependable and primitive means or record keeping. They were by European
standards, more primitive but they were also a peaceful and open people who
time and again trusted the drunken outcasts, murderers, thieves, rapists and
psychopaths of British and European society, who were in reality the true
founders of the United States.
The records that were kept were mostly lost, and for good reason, but what
is available paints a very different picture than what the US Government,
founded by these same outcasts, would have us believe.
During the period when the “Thanksgiving “feast was to have occurred, the
Europeans invaders were in the middle of one of the bloodiest campaigns of
genocide that signaled the founding of the US.
The atrocities meted out on the Indians reached legendary proportions, with
killings, rape and mutilations being the norm, and as one story goes the
Indians were invited to the feast in order for the whites to be able to kill
one of the Indian chiefs, Wituwamat, who was wanted by Miles Standish and
who was later beheaded and whose head was displayed on a stake in Plymouth
for several years. According to historian Gary B. Nash, it was “a symbol of
white power”. Standish had the Indian chief’s young brother hanged for good
measure as well.
From that time on, the whites were known to the Indians of Massachusetts by
the name "Wotowquenange," which in their tongue meant cutthroats and
stabbers. Massachusetts was were the supposed feast took place.
Until around 1970, the 350th anniversary of the landing of the Pilgrims, the
official history of Thanksgiving was rarely challenged, having been founded
in 1863 by Abraham Lincoln, the fairy tale existed in the American
imagination untouched by facts for more than a hundred years.
In 1970, when the president of the Federated Indian League, Frank B. James,
prepared a speech which exposed some of the crimes committed by the
Pilgrims, including robbing the graves of the Wampanoags, he was not allowed
to give it.
Instead, Massachusetts officials offered him another watered down speech in
keeping with the official story. Thousand of Indians protested and starting
in 1970 Thanksgiving became a National Day of Mourning for the American
Indian people. Frank B. James’ speech began like this:
"We welcomed you, the white man, with open arms, little knowing that it was
the beginning of the end; that before 50 years were to pass, the Wampanoag
would no longer be a free people."
Massachusetts officials of course refused to allow such a speech to be
given, and although the officials wanted him to speak Frank James refused.
On Thanksgiving Day 1970, hundreds of Indians from around the country came
to protest, marking the first National Day of Mourning, a day to mark the
genocide of Native Americans, who were being exterminated as the early
settlers prospered. The true story of "Thanksgiving" is what whites did not
want Mr. James to tell.
Another chief wanted by Standish was Metacomet Captain Benjamin Church
tracked down and murdered Metacomet in 1676, his body was quartered and
parts were "left for the wolves." The great Indian chief's hands were cut
off and sent to Boston and his head went to Plymouth, where it was set upon
a pole on the real first "day of public Thanksgiving for the beginning of
revenge upon the enemy."
Metacomet's nine-year-old son was destined for execution because, the whites
reasoned, the offspring of the devil must pay for the sins of their father.
The child was instead shipped to the Caribbean to spend his life in slavery.
Thanksgiving is in fact a holiday that celebrates the fact the Indians were
so easy to kill and conquer and that their lands were so easy to take. The
Pilgrims were thankful to God for this and for that reason alone it was made
an official holiday.
In memory of the exterminated Indian peoples and nations of the Americas,
against whom genocide was carried out, whose lands were stolen and whose
descendants like myself have suffered persecution and been marginalized at
the hands of the US government and the ancestors of psychopaths, I am
fasting today, and praying for the souls of a once proud and beautiful
people, forgotten by history, whose souls still scream for justice. The opinions and views expressed here are the writer's own. Historical facts, as documented by various sources were used in writing this piece.
21 November 2012, 23:46
29 days to the end of the world
© Collage: The Voice of Russia
The Mayan Calendar ends on December 21, 2012 and with a galactic alignment
and cataclysmic events we will see a new era in human consciousness and our
planet will be changed as we join and become one with the universe and those
who designed and created us. These are just some of the things that are
supposed to occur on December 21, 2012 at 11:11:11 GMT. Is there any basis
for any of these claims? Read on to find out more, and stock up on supplies,
the end is near.
In less than a month we are coming up on a date that has many in the world
worried December 21, 2012. A date that many people believe will either be
the end of the world, the Apocalypse, the day of the Earth’s total
destruction or the beginning of a rebirth, a sort of transformation, or even
that we will all be transported to something like heaven and the all of us
will live in paradise.
For the most part the majority see the date as being the latter, a sort of
re-birth or a move to another level, rather than the end of the world.
Regardless there is very wide speculation that cataclysmic and apocalyptic
events are soon to take place.
With less than a month to go can one really give credence to such
speculation, or should we all be laughing at these prophecies? On December
22 that should all be clear.
The main proponents of the date December 21, 2012 as being the end of times
or a rebirth are those who cite the end of the Mayan calendar, which is not
really an end, but rather when, according to Mayanist scholars the calendar
is simply reset to begin the next cycle called the 14th baktun, marked by
the end date of the 13th baktun or 13.0.0.0.0. These proponents also try to
tie several celestial alignments including the alignment of the Sun, the
Earth and the center of the Milky Way.
Some Mayanists believe that the ancient Mayans unlocked the code of the
universe which is something akin to computer binary code and which was used
to “program” the universe and even our own DNA. Their use of a system of 1s
and 0s was remarkably accurate in formulating their calendar and cosmic
maps. Even predicting Galactic Alignment, an event which takes place only
once every 26,000 years, then the Winter Solstice occurs and the Sun is
going to be at the intersect point of Ecliptic of the Milky Way Galaxy and
its Equator.
The I Ching also predicts the date December 21, 2012 as being when
everything afterwards will be new. It is important to note that the I Ching
also used a binary code which was the equivalent of 0s and 1s. The I Ching
known as the Book of Changes or Zhouyi, is one of the oldest texts known to
man and contains a system for divination not unlike geomancy or the Ifa
system. Its is believed to have originated sometime in the 3rd to the 2nd
millennium BC. It believed the I Ching was a calendar.
Christianity, with its many interpretations and speculation is also full of
references to end times happening during our times although theologians can
not agree on the exact timing of any single date or event. Many of those who
believe in the Torah code, a code used to decrypt secret messages in the
bible, also point to the date in question as being the end of the world.
Eschatologists who use the bible to predict the end and many Christians
point to many other signs and what they see as warnings, many occurring in
the Book of Revelations written by the apostle John. Briefly they say that
the Antichrist will appear and sign a peace pact with Israel for seven
years, a period they call the Tribulation. This period will herald the
appearance of the four horsemen of the apocalypse and the seventh seal after
which the Antichrist will attempt to destroy Jerusalem leading to the Battle
of Armageddon when Jesus Christ will return and destroy the Antichrist. Some
say this is all happening today. Has there been the breaking of a 7 year
pact with Israel? That and the final assault on Jerusalem will have to take
place within the next couple of weeks if we are to believe the biblical
versions.
Then we have those who follow Terrance McKenna and his Timewave Zero theory
and his numerological formula that he claimed calculates correlations
between time events during history. He calculated the end of the world to be
shortly before December 21st, 2012 but then decided the Mayans must have
been more accurate.
Events that are supposed to happen on that date include a black hole
swallowing up the Earth, a collision with a planet called the Nibiru
Cataclysm, our four dimensional souls becoming aware of their three
dimensional existence and joining together with the great cosmic mind, the
magnetic poles shifting causing the planet to be torn apart, planets
aligning, a beam of light charging the sun from the center of the galaxy
causing flares will which engulf the earth, a 5th element being invented in
a particle collider which swallows the Earth, man inventing time travel and
other cataclysms.
All
of these things have no real basis in science and should not be worried
about or taken too seriously. My advice for December 21, 2012 11:11 GMT: if
you must, take the day off, you never know someone who decides to end it all
might take you with them (just kidding), read a book, call your family and
friends, make plans for the 22nd of December, check out Anonymous and their
Tyler release, watch a film or have a good meal. Who knows? It may be your
last!
20 November 2012, 10:48
Answer to Magnitsky Act: “War on Terror List”
© Collage "The Voice of Russia"
While the US continues to demonize the Russian Federation, this time with a
draconian bill called the Magnitsky Act, a list compiled of people they
claim were responsible for the tragic death of Sergei Magnitsky, official
Moscow has stated that they will not let the provocative attempt to
interfere in the internal affairs of Russia go unanswered. Many see this as
a thinly veiled attempt to continue anti-Russian discrimination that was
supposed to be gotten rid of with the abolition of the Jackson Vanik
Amendment. I propose the following list as a good place to start in
formulating a proper answer. Most of the people on my list are in one way or
another responsible for the deaths of hundreds of thousands of innocent
people.
The US has decided to attempt to punish the Russian Federation and again
obtain some sort of political and propaganda victory over Russia by enacting
the Magnitsky Bill.
We know the US cares nothing about human rights or rule of law. They only do
so for their own interests. So I have compiled a list of people I think
should be sanctioned for crimes that have gone unpunished but that have
caused untold death and suffering.
I propose the following list, as a start, in response to the “Magnitsky
List”. Let’s call it the “War on Terror List”. Remember this is only a
start. This list details people guilty of War Crimes and Crimes Against
Humanity, crimes much more serious than not improperly diagnosing a patient
leading to death. As a member of humanity I think they should be prosecuted.
Thank you to CodePink for
helping with this.
Barrack Hussein Obama US President makes the list for continuing Bush’s war
crimes and for his extra-judicial drone executions and his daily kill list.
Other people on the list could include the following.
For war crimes and crimes against humanity:
George Walker Bush former president, Richard Cheney former US VP, John D.
Ashcroft former US Attorney General, Colin Powell former US Secretary of
State, Tommy Franks former US Army General, Donald Rumsfeld former US
Secretary of Defense, Doug Feith former Under Secretary of Defense for
Policy, Stanley McChrystal former ISAF Commander, Erik Prince former
CEO/Chairman of Prince Group/Blackwater Worldwide, Condoleeza Rice former US
National Security Adviser and Secretary of State, George Tenet former
Director of Central Intelligence, John Negroponte former US Deputy Secretary
of State/Ambassador to UN, John Bolton former US Ambassador to the UN, Paul
Wolfowitz former President of World Bank and Michael Chertoff former
Secretary of Homeland Security, Stephen Hadley former US National Security
Advisor.
For formulating, carrying out and otherwise taking part in or enabling
illegal torture programs, as well as crimes against humanity:
Col. Louie Banks, chief of the Psychological Applications Directorate at the
U.S. Army’s Special Operations Command, Dr. James Mitchell torture
architect, Dr. John Jessen from Survival, Evasion, Resistance, and Escape
program (SERE), Jonathan Fredman CIA Lawyer, Judge Jay Bybee US Federal
Judge, Timothy Flanigan former deputy to Alberto Gonzales, Elliot Abrams
former Assistant Sec of State for Human Rights, William J. Haynes former
General Counsel of US Department of Defense, Kyle D. "Dusty" Foggos former
US Intelligence Officer, Lynndie England and all the staff at Abu Ghraib
including the command structure, Paul Burney torture program architect, John
Leso torture program designer and Robert Delahunty - war crimes and crimes
against humanity.
For profiteering and promoting aggressive wars and war crimes:
Rex Tillerson CEO/Chairman, Exxon Mobil Corporation, David Lesar
CEO/Chairman, Halliburton Company, David O’Reilly CEO/Chairman, Chevron
Corporation, Robert J. Stevens Lockheed Martin CEO, Nicholas E. Calio former
Citigroup Executive Vice President, Paul Bremer former Director of
Reconstruction/Humanitarian Assistance,
For seeking and formulating ways to circumvent international laws
conventions and standards with regards to aggressive wars, the Geneva
Conventions, torture, assassinations, indefinite detention and other crimes:
I. Lewis Libby former Assistant to GW Bush and Chief of Staff to Cheney,
John Bellinger former Legal Adviser to US Secretary of State, Steven
Bradbury former head of Office of Legal Council, Andrew Card former White
House Chief of Staff, David Addington former legal counsel and chief of
staff to Dick Cheney, Mary Matalin former assistant to GW Bush and counselor
to Cheney, John Rizzo former General Counsel for CIA, Jonathan Fredman CIA
lawyer, Michael Mukasey former US Attorney General, Joe Lieberman Senator
from Connecticut, John Yoo Office of Legal Counsel - war crimes and crimes
against humanity (OLC).
Special mention to Karl Rove former White House Deputy Chief of Staff and
one of the architects of the War on Terror, guilty of all of the above as
well as treason to the US for “outing” a CIA agent.
Eric Holder Former Attorney General for whitewashing for Bush and ensuring
no one would ever be held accountable.
Many of these people are internationally wanted and may not travel outside
of the US for “their own safety” but many carry on as if nothing has
happened and have been responsible for, what could be in the final count,
millions of deaths, acts of aggressive war, torture, illegal detention,
kidnapping across international lines, war profiteering, and countless
violations of the Geneva Conventions and international as well as US law.
The following are officials and people who have been involved in the
execution of innocent people when there was a preponderance of evidence
pointing to innocence and who allowed innocent people to be executed. Why
not? We could do an unjust execution list.
Corpus Christi Texas Judge Jack Blackmon, prosecutors involved in the case
and all detectives who knew Carlos DeLuna was innocent yet did nothing to
stop his execution, Antonin Gregory Scalia an Associate Justice of the
Supreme Court of the United States for his rulings on death penalty issues.
Cameron Todd Willingham was also an innocent man executed in George Bush’s
state of Texas by the justice system Justice Scalia insists works properly,
in this case we could also add everyone involved in sending an innocent man
to death such as Douglas Fogg and Manuel Vasquez incompetent investigators
whose claims sent Cameron to die. James P. Grigson (Dr. Death), a forensic
psychiatrist who helped send many people to the electric chair in Texas,
including Willingham. Governor Rick Perry (250 executions) who ignored
evidence of innocence, prosecutor John Jackson, Judge Charlie Baird and the
presiding judge in the case .
Other innocent people executed for whom lists could be made include, Johnny
Frank Garret, Wayne Felker (Georgia), Ruben Cantu (Texas), Larry Griffin
(Missouri), Joseph O'Dell (Virginia), David Spence (Texas), Gary Graham
(Texas), Claude Jones (Texas), Troy Davis (Georgia), Jesse Tafero (Florida),
Lionel Herrera (Texas, evidenced to clear him dismissed by court before
execution), Timothy Cole (Texas) innocent man who died in prison and the
list goes on and on.
A list might also be compiled of everyone involved in the Victor Bout case,
an innocent Russian man who was kidnapped, taken to the US and sentenced for
crimes he had never committed.
Why not a list regarding everyone involved in persecuting Julian Assange,
Bradley Manning, Jeremy Hammond, the NATO 5 or Constantin Yaroshenko? Most
people outside the US, and with very good reason, believe they are innocent
too.
So you see it is completely ludicrous, pompous, sanctimonious, hypocritical,
and self-righteous for the US to come up with something like the Magnitsky
List and Act. They have one case they harp on and on about, while refusing
to look at themselves in the mirror.
If Russia begins making lists in response, the names on them will not number
approximately 60, but will climb into the hundreds of thousands. On a daily
basis people are dying all over the US and the world due to the illegal
actions of corrupt US officials, a corrupt racist system and an arbitrary,
corrupt, racist and archaic judiciary.
Self-righteous indignation, vilification of Russia and any country the US
does not like, pompous rhetoric, hollow grandstanding, aggressive threats
and the perpetual need to kill and control are things that may impress the
voters back home, but in reality the world has had enough of the most
criminal, racist country in the world attempting to dictate to it how to
behave, especially when their own home is in such an obviously pathetic and
disgraceful state, beneath the contempt of even a mere list, or lists, as
the case may be.
The Magnitsky Act is an attempt at manipulating the inner workings of a
sovereign nation. It is ridiculous to believe that a country with the most
abysmal human rights record in the world, a country that commits
extra-judicial executions and crimes against humanity whenever it pleases, a
country that tortures and murders at will with the most cowardly and
despicable weapon (drones), a country which is so criminally negligent and
morally bankrupt that it rewards and protects killers and thugs and
torturers and scoffs at any criticism, actually cares about a poor Russian
lawyer who died of complications in custody.
Every day in the US miscarriages of justice and crimes by officials occur on
a scale far outweighing anything that may have occurred to poor Mr.
Magnitsky so the US is no position whatsoever to dictate to anyone how to
conduct their own affairs.
Let them prosecute even one person on the above list, for committing crimes
that cost millions of people unspeakable pain and misery or their very lives
because until they do they have no right to even speak the words
“human-rights” or "rule-of-law".
The official version of the events of 9-11 were a lie which the US
government hides and every war crime and crime against humanity that has
happened since then has completely stripped the US of any right to dictate
anything to anyone. It is a criminal regime where criminals protect and
cover for each other, a criminal regime which is completely delusional in
its idea of its own splendor and righteousness and which is rotten through
to the very core with black cancerous evil.
The US government and the demons running it make a mockery of the motto on
their very currency (In God We Trust), not only the high-crimes do so but
the aggressive wars, the bloodshed and terror they spread throughout the
world and the fact that any country that institutionalizes and promotes sex
between men as a sign of moral superiority while at the same time attempting
to control women's bodies and ignoring: institutionalized racism, police
brutality, economic inequality, lack of healthcare, the problem of
homelessness, an education system that is only accesible to the elites,
rampant gun violence, an inordinate number of the population in prison, a
government controlled by corporations, an archaic an undemocratic election
system, unification of church and state, the continued reliance on fossil
fuels and the ensuing destruction of the planet and crimes against children
has long ago lost sight of any god, unless God for them, is the Devil.
17 November 2012, 13:06
Double standards and an invasion of Palestine
As Israel prepares to invade Palestine the media war has been cranked up to
full blast. The West claims Hamas is a terrorist organization, Israel claims
Hamas has no right to defend the territories, rockets have hit Jerusalem,
Egypt has come out in support of the Palestinians and no one is ready for
peace. The violence threatens to destabilize the entire region which would
give the West the impetus for invading Iran and Syria. Hopefully this is
wrong but it is a distinct possibility.
As Israel prepares to launch an invasion of Gaza and Palestine with its
superior army and forces in what they say is an operation to destroy Hamas,
which, is responsible for the launching of rockets into Israel, the
worldwide condemnation of the violence by both sides is almost unanimous.
Yet pleas for reigning in the violence are being ignored and seem to have
fallen on deaf ears.
Much of the world’s condemnation has been directed at Israel, although it
was Hamas which attacked first and in fact drew first blood in the exchange
of rocket fire.
The reason for the attack by Hamas is not as simple as many in the West
would like everyone to believe and it is in fact Israel and Washington who
have not only caused the conflict but have made it almost impossible to
bring Hamas and Islamists to the negotiating table.
While Palestine is seeking recognition at the United Nations and had been
ready to enter serious and substantive negotiations with Israel to guarantee
that what is currently taking place never did again, Israel refused to stop
settlement activity and continues to refuse to recognize the Palestinian
state.
Hamas for its part continues to call for the destruction of Israel, which
may be understandable as Israel has left them almost no other position as it
has refused to negotiate and has refused to cease settlement activity in
occupied Palestinian lands.
The problem for decades now has been the question of borders and the whole
question could be resolved if Israel ceased all settlement activity and
agreed to recognize the 1967 borders, but that is something Israel has
refused to do.
Although Israel is surrounding by Islamic countries Israel has for the most
part refused to seek peace with its neighbors, instead continuing on a path
of never ending violence. This lies in its refusal to abide by the 1967
borders and allow Palestine to have its own state with its capital in part
of Jerusalem.
The never ending cycle of violence has been made worse and has been
propagated by both sides, one side calling for the destruction of Israel and
the other calling for the destruction of Hamas and Hezbollah which they have
branded as terrorist groups.
This is where the West and Israel have shot themselves in the foot and where
one has to question whether there is any real desire by Israel and the West
for any sort of peace.
By branding these groups, in this case Hamas, terrorist organizations, it
has made it virtually impossible for Washington to accept their overtures
for peace, allow them to be recognized at the negotiating table or come to
any form of agreement with them.
The US has continued the terrorist labeling for so long and has not only
made it part of the American psyche but official policy that they do not
negotiate with terrorists that is impossible politically, especially on the
domestic front, to negotiate with these groups even when they seek peace.
In this case it is clear that Hamas was in fact seeking peace, as is
evidenced by the fact that Ahmed Jabari, the assassinated leader of the
Hamas military wing, was in possession of a draft agreement for a permanent
truce hours before he and his entourage were eradicated by an Israeli
air-strike.
The terrorist label has been so over-used, that now it covers almost any
person, group, organization or country, for that matter that the US does not
like for whatever reason.
Palestine has no army as would a normal recognized nation so it is therefore
defenseless. This is where groups like Hamas and Hezbollah come into the
picture. The Palestinians, just like the Israelis, have the same universal
desire to survive and exist as a people and a nation, but because of their
status this has been almost impossible.
The problem with labeling groups such as Hamas and Hezbollah as terrorist
organizations, as I said is that then it is extremely difficult to openly
negotiate with them, and for them it is then difficult to claim they seek
peace as most westerners are already trained to believe this is an
impossibility.
Once again we come across another example of US and western hypocrisy. This
time in the labeling, in reality Hamas and the Palestinians are fighting for
freedom. The problem is that they are doing so from Israel. For the US any
enemy of Israel is an enemy for theirs. We have seen the same thing time and
time again.
When Muammar Gadaffi decided to cooperate with the US, even after clearly
supporting what were considered acts of terrorism, he went from being a
terrorists and became a “friend”.
Saddam Hussein’s case was the opposite. When he had “good relations” with
the US he was okay. When he did something such as changing the country’s
hard currency investments and oil trade to something other than the US
dollar (for example) he then became a terrorist.
In Libya, when terrorists brutally assassinated Gadaffi, the US called them
rebels and freedom fighters. After all they killed a US enemy, and the same
is true in Syria. The US is even paying Al-Qaeda operatives to assist them
in changing the regime and they are being called soldiers of the “Free Libya
Army”. Why are armed insurgents and real terrorists, who are doing
everything to destroy the legitimate power in Syria, supported and accepted?
Because they are fulfilling US interests.
Osama Bin Laden is another example, first he was a “freedom fighter” funded
and backed by the US, and was a “good” guy when he was fighting the Soviet
Union. Then all of a sudden he became terrorist number one, when he was no
longer needed.
This has become a disservice to all the parties involved including Israel,
but it does remain in line with US policy in the region. Here it is
important to recall that the goal is ultimately controlling and taking over
Iran and Syria: Iran for its oil and resources which are supposed to be
ultimately taken over and the Syria through which the oil is suppose to be
routed to the Mediterranean.
It may be that the initial attack on Syria was not from Hamas but a spark to
light a larger fire, carried out by rogue elements. This latest violence
would allow the West to label Hamas terrorists and Iran as a supporter of
terrorism. Something that benefits and justifies US plans for the region.
Israel is right in the middle. If the war continues there will be more
groups who will join to defend Palestine, which will lead to more bloodshed
on both sides.
Once again we need to look at who benefits here? Does Israel benefit from
the violence? Maybe, what with elections coming up. Does the US benefit? Of
course they do, this will allow them to expand their operations in the
region, under the pretext of defending Israel.
Depending on how they choose to play the current fighting and where supplies
such as missiles are coming from (Iran?) this may allow them to launch
another aggressive war and an invasion of Iran.
Who will suffer the most in the conflict? Palestine, unless the rest of the
Muslim world comes to their rescue, which is not out of the question but
which will destabilize the entire region even further and seriously damage
Israel.
The question remains, is it possible that the US is ready to sacrifice
Israel in order to reach its own ends and advance its geopolitical agenda in
the region? Doubtful, but it is one possibility which needs to be looked at.
The views and opinions expressed her are the writer’s own. He can be reached
at jar2@list.ru.
16 November 2012, 03:52
Israeli – Palestinian conflict escalates and “Tango Down”
Assassinated Hamas leader Jabari was about to broker a permanent peace deal
when an Israeli air-strike killed him and everyone around him. With an
almost unanimous call from the world community for calm, to exercise
restraint and not to escalate the already volatile situation in the region
and between the two parties, the current Israeli – Gaza conflict continues
to escalate, with Israel preparing for a full blown invasion of Gaza.
The exchange of bombings and rocket fire continues unabated between Israel
and Gaza with Israel claiming that at least 245 rockets have been launched
in Israel from Gaza since the hostilities began.
Israel claims to have hit more than 200 targets in Gaza and according to
statements by officials their targets include missile locations and Hamas
infrastructure.
Hamas claims to be targeting military bases and military locations using
mortar fire and rockets to attack Israel, Hamas has even released videos
showing Fajir F missiles be launch against Israel.
Meanwhile Israel has launched an all out propaganda war as well, with their
main onslaught being through social media such as Twitter, Facebook and
YouTube. The Western press, always sympathetic to Israel is assisting
greatly with news sources repeating words and terms such as "terror sites",
“Palestinian terrorist organizations”, “terrorists”, “Islamists” and the
like.
Israel is attempting to gain support and saying what they are doing is in
self-defense, using catchy American style code names for their military
operations against the enclave such as "Operation Pillar of Defense".
The military wing of Hamas, the Ezzedine al-Qassam Brigades, of which Khalil
al-Jabari was the head, also launched an operation with an American style
name, announcing the commencement of “Operation Shale Stones” a short time
ago.
Osama Hamdan a spokesman for Hamas also claims that Gaza is defending itself
and repeated what many believe, namely that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin
Netanyahu is looking to increase his election chances in January.
Unfortunately bombing and killing seems to be something people look for in a
leader, equating it with strength and security.
The support is there from Israel’s staunchest and eternal allies, the US and
the UK but the support is not as broad as Israel would like.
Israel’s refusal to stop settlement building on occupied territories, it
refusal to enter into any sort of real productive dialogue with the
Palestinian Authority, it superior firepower and military force and the fact
that once again most of the victims of Israel’s “precision” missiles are
killing innocent civilians, makes it hard for many to accept Israel’s
stance. Israel’s threats of a full scale ground war and invasion of Gaza
also ring hollow when claiming to act in self-defense.
Then there are all of the political machinations, for example the upcoming
elections, and in my opinion the support of the US and the UK for Israel may
actually be hurting Israel in the eyes of the world who are beginning to see
the US and the UK’s imperial ambitions globally for what they are and have
no sympathy for Israel’s own imperial ambitions.
For those citing Netanyahu’s elections prospects as the reason for the
current attacks, they are supported by very similar events during the
pre-election attacks on Gaza in 2008.
There are also issues as to the illegality of Israel’s actions which are of
concern to many and the West’s arbitrary use of the term terrorism and
terrorist. In Syria attacks that are truly terroristic in nature are not
labeled as such by the West because they support the goal of the terrorists.
For many it seems strange that Gaza would attack the superior power of
Israel but few would argue if Hamas did in fact carry out the initial
attacks, and some experts are not quick to rule out the possibility that
they may have been carried out not by Hamas but by extremist factions, that
Israel does not have the right to defend itself. The problem is that Israel
has refused to make a serious effort at attaining peace with its neighbors.
To look at the numbers, Gaza has approximately 36,000 fighters with some
less-than-state-of-the-art mortars and rockets, while Israel has 175,000
regular troops, 450,000 reservists, US F-16 fighter-bombers, Merkava tanks,
the Iron Dome interceptor system, precision guided missiles, Apache gunships
and some of the best equipped ground troops in the world.
There is also speculation that, given these figures and the fact the Hamas
would have been, quite frankly out of their minds, to risk any aggression
against Israel knowing Netanyahu’s position and the fact that the 2013
elections are just around the corner, something that prohibits him from
showing any sign of weakness as it may hurt his chances, the event was
planned to allow Israel to break all ceasefire agreements and assassinate
the leader of Hamas’s military wing Khalil al-Jabari, who was killed in the
first precision air strike.
The UN meanwhile was at an impasse after an emergency session, with the US
supporting Israel’s right to defend itself, Egypt saying further aggression
from Israel would have a negative effect on the security and stability of
the region, and Palestine’s envoy characterizing Israel’s aggression as
vulgarly and publicly boasting about willfully killing Palestinians.
For Israel the support of Egypt is critical, because Israel needs Egypt to
maintain peace with Gaza and the Palestinians, Egypt supports Palestine but
experts agree it is unlikely, although possible that Egypt, under Mursi and
the Muslim Brotherhood, would enter into an armed conflict with Israel.
Israel has the right to defend itself, no one would argue that point I
think, but Palestine also has that right. With neighbors who want to see the
Jewish state wiped off the face of the earth, Israel has every right to
defend itself, and every right to do whatever it takes to guarantee its
existence, but this must not infringe on the rights others have to exist as
well. The same can be said for any state or people.
Israel, as well as Palestine must do everything they can to not allow
innocent civilians to die, on this count Israel has lost the moral
high-ground with consistent high-civilian casualties and seemingly
indiscriminate killing, even in “precision” assassination operations such as
that carried out against Khalil al-Jabari, when everyone who happened to be
around him were also taken out. Mossad and Israeli special services could
have just as easily assassinated him with a 50 caliber round rather than an
air-strike.
Israel has reportedly killed approximately 20 people at the time of writing,
including Jabari and six Hamas fighters, a pregnant woman with twins, three
infants and, according to RT, the 11-month-old son of BBC Arabic journalist
Jihad Masharawi, who also lost his sister-in-law. According to reports at
least 200 have been wounded.
There are reports that Israel has lost from 3-15, although there are no
accurate reports as to their identities.
Meanwhile peace activists have come out all over the world, even in Israel
where about 100 people gathered near the home of the Israeli Minister of
Defense Ehud Barak’s home, there were large scale protests in Ramallah, in
Cairo, Istanbul, Haifa and Jerusalem.
Anonymous hacktivists are also involved in the protests and have come out
strongly in defense of the Palestinians. Anons have called for attacks
against websites belonging to the Israeli government and reportedly have
been successful in taking down several sites including the Israeli Defense
Forces site where the message “tango down” appeared.
Anonymous has distributed a statement reading: “To the people of Gaza and
the 'Occupied Territories', know that Anonymous stands with you in this
fight. We will do everything in our power to hinder the evil forces of the
IDF arrayed against you.” Tools for staying on-line have also appeared on
Anon sites.
Israel's sworn enemy Iran, has of course also condemned the Israeli
offensive as "organized terrorism" and Lebanon’s Hezbollah called the
strikes on Gaza a "criminal aggression".
Israeli peace activist Gershon Baskin, told Israel’s
Haaretz:
“Hours before Ahmed Jabari was assassinated, he received the draft of a
permanent truce agreement with Israel, which included mechanisms for
maintaining the cease-fire in the case of a flare-up between Israel and the
factions in the Gaza Strip. Senior officials in Israel knew about his
contacts with Hamas and Egyptian intelligence aimed at formulating the
permanent truce, but nevertheless approved the assassination.”
Some will do anything to keep the war machine rolling.
The opinions and view expressed here are my own. I can be reached at
jar2@list.ru.
16 November 2012, 01:31
Thousands of Palestinians could be killed - Alon Ben-Meir - interview
Photo: EPA
Dr. Alon Ben-Meir spoke
with Voice of Russia's John Robles about the current hostilities currently
taking place between factions in the Gaza Strip and Israel. Dr. Meir is not
certain that it was in fact Hamas who launched hundreds of rockets into
Israel. Dr. Meir discusses the relationship between the Palestinian bid
before the UN and the current hostilities, as well as how the two sides will
likely see the crisis to the end. According to Dr. Meir any form of
aggression against Israel, with Netanyahu coming up for re-election is
foolish and Hamas knows that. Again leaving room for doubt as to who is
really behind the attacks.
Hello! This is John Robles, I’m speaking with Dr.
Alon Ben-Meir. He is a professor in international affairs and
relations at New York University in the US.
Robles: Hello
Dr. Meir! How are you this evening?
Meir: I’m
good, thank you John. How are you?
Robles: I’m
very well. Nice to be speaking with you again.
Meir: My
pleasure.
Robles: I’d
like to speak with you about the situation with Israel in the Gaza Strip. Is
this going to expand to a wider conflict?
Meir: Unfortunately,
this started when certain extremists from Gaza, I’m not suggesting it was
necessarily Hamas, attacked an Israeli jeep and wounded four soldiers, that
was really how this whole thing started. Israel retaliated, several
Palestinians were killed and a few were injured. Subsequently Hamas and some
Islamic Jihad started to fire rockets against Israel, specifically in the
south, there were nearly 120 of them. That’s really what tipped the balance
in a way, that’s when the Israelis decided – enough is enough – and they
strike killing Jabar who is the head of the military wing…
Robles: Ahmed
Jabari, right?
Meir: Ahmed
Jabar, and a few others who died with him and unfortunately his son as well.
And now of course there is an extreme tension because Israel is saying that
if Hamas does not stop its rocket attacks, Israel will be prepared to take
extreme measures, including a new incursion into Gaza pretty much with the
intention of decapitating the Hamas leadership.
And the Hamas is saying: well, this attack killing the commander is
something that they will not take sitting down and they will be retaliating.
You know, the situation has become extremely tense. And surely, as you
heard, many countries, specifically Egypt, condemned the Israeli action. But
the truth of the matter is that Egypt probably is the only country right now
that can diffuse the tension, specifically because it enjoys a tremendous
influence on Hamas.
Robles: I
wanted to ask you, first off, the killing of the military chief, I believe
Ahmed, you said Jabar or is it Jabari?
Meir: Yes,
Jabar.
Robles: Ok,
Ahmed Jabar. How is that going to affect Hamas? Is that going to have a huge
(or any kind of) decapitating effect on Hamas?
Meir: He
is the chief operator when it comes to acts of violence and planning acts of
terror or attacking Israel in a variety of ways. He actually was the person
who has planned many attacks against Israel. He was in Israeli jail for more
than ten years. He was released about 7 or 8-9 years ago and he assumed this
commanding position back in Gaza with Hamas.
So, he is very familiar to the Israelis. And the Israeli intelligence knew
only too well who is behind these rocket attacks. And they could pin down
when he left his home and he was in a car, they knew exactly when he left
and this is exactly what they targeted. Along with that they have targeted
many depots of rockets about twenty different targets at the same time to
prevent or at least to reduce Hamas’s ability to fire rockets in huge
numbers day in and day out.
This is the beginning of something that could escalate, which in my view,
Egypt does not want to see happened. And I explain that by simply saying: if
Israel decides to undertake a new incursion Egypt will be in a terrible
bind. If they help Hamas, they will have to confront the Israeli military,
and they don’t want to do that, almost at any cost. If they don’t come to
Hamas’ aid, the Egyptian public will complain: Oh why are we abandoning our
brothers in Gaza?
So, the Egyptian Government does not want to entangle itself with Israel
because of Hamas. Having said that, it is in their best interest therefore
to try to work out a new ceasefire, provided this is done as soon as
possible, because this conflict could escalate very very quickly. And once a
decision is made in Israel to go in, they will go in and do whatever they
think is right in order to protect the civilian population.
Reminder
Robles: How
is this going to affect, or how has this been affected, by the Palestinian
bid to seek UN recognition?
Meir: Let
me say, the irony is that there is a tremendous enmity and hostility between
the Palestinian authorities on the West Bank and Hamas. This is one of the
reasons that they could never get really together and establish a so called
“unity government”. So, the two in many ways are not connected.
These incidents will not stop. Mahmoud Abbas is for turning to the UN and
pursue the Palestinian authorities’ effort to secure an observer state
instead of an observer entity. I think they will continue to do so and these
events might even strengthen their resolve other than weaken it because they
do want to distinguish themselves versus with what Hamas has been doing.
Robles: Do
you think this had some bearing or some influence on Israel's decision?
Meir: I
don’t think so only because Israel knows only too well that Hamas and the
Fatah, the Palestinian authorities simply do not see eye to eye. I don’t
believe that the Israelis have decided to take this road because they want
to distract the attention of the international community from the
Palestinian bid for the United Nations General Assembly because really it’s
very difficult to find the connection between the two. And if anything, I
think the Israeli Government knows that this is going to strengthen the
resolve of the PA rather than weaken it.
Robles: Do
you think Israel was justified in the level of the military force they are
using?
Meir: Well
you know, it is a point of view in this particular case, the Israelis, when
you speak with them, they will tell you: no country is going to sit idle
when a 120 rockets land on its territory and subjecting schools and
hospitals and homes to the threat of these rockets that could considerably
kill scores of people. So happily no one has died by these attacks. And they
will not tolerate it because it is a major violation of their sovereignty as
a state. That is the Israeli position.
Hamas’ position on the other hand is that you come in, you kill the major
commander, you destroy so many storage for these rockets: that too is
unacceptable. But the truth of the matter is this John: Hamas knows only too
well that to challenge Israel will be a foolish thing to do at this
juncture. They cannot say this is a war, a declaration of war because if
they declare a war or if they treat it as a war they will be the losers.
Everybody in the world would know that, especially when you have the Prime
Minister like Netanyahu who is not going to take this sitting down,
especially when he is running for re-election come January. This has to be
understood.
So, the Hamas had better rethink its position. And they may very well
retaliate in order to save some face but they also need to understand that
going too far it could invite Israeli invasion. And that needs to be
avoided. Again, I’m not justifying who should be doing what or who went
wrong and who is right. What I’m saying is this is no match. Hamas could end
up with a significant defeat and perhaps result in the deaths of hundreds,
if not thousands, of Palestinians in Gaza.
Robles: Ok,
Alon thank you very much.
Meir: My
pleasure, my pleasure! Anytime John, thank you.
Robles: I
really appreciate it.
You were listening to an interview with Dr. Alon Ben-Meir. He is a professor
in international affairs and relations at New York University. Thanks for
listening.
13 November 2012, 11:13
Cameron: Invade Syria! / General: “You and whose army?”
Photo: EPA
The formation of a so-called unified Syrian opposition, in of all places
Doha Qatar, which in reality does not include many Syrian groups and
factions fighting against Bashar Assad, was hailed by the West and many
Sunni Muslim states as a victory and touted as the legitimate voice of the
Syrian people. The West continues fueling the bloodshed with arms and is
even reported to be training snipers and assassination teams to kill Assad.
Meanwhile David Cameron’s calls for military intervention in Syria have hit
a brick wall at full speed.
The West continues to attempt to impose its plans on Syria and effect a
regime change that has been from the start wanted more by Washington than
the Syrian people.
The current attempt to legitimatize the armed Western-backed insurgents came
in the form of a conference that was held notably outside of the territory
of Syria on Sunday. A telling gathering made up of mainly Western
marionettes, such much so that many of the “real” Syrian opposition leaders
who are based within Syria, refused to show up and take part in the staged
conference.
The setting Qatar is also telling as the country has classically supported
Sunni interests and Sunni Islamists and is also the home to American
military bases and the US Central Command (CENTCOM) which also has bases in
Kuwait, Bahrain, the United Arab Emirates, Oman and Pakistan.
It is important to underline the fact that Syria is largely populated by
Sunni Muslims and Bashar al-Assad is Alawite, which some describe a sect of
Shia Islam. This explains why Qatar and other countries are so against Assad
and willing to play the US front man in attempting to remove Assad and his
Alawite led government.
The result of the conference in Doha, Qatar featuring representatives of
various associations and groups making up the so-called Syrian opposition,
was the signing of an agreement forming a united opposition group to be
called the National Coalition (NC).
The US and the UK were quick to announce their support of the new group for
obvious reasons: it will allow them to claim supporting a group that the
world is supposed to view as legitimate, even though it was formed outside
of the country and features largely hand-picked representatives friendly to
Washington. If that was not bad enough it gets worse.
On Monday the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC), comprising Saudi Arabia
(Sunni), Bahrain (Sunni), the United Arab Emirates (Sunni), Oman (Ibadi),
Qatar (Sunni) and Kuwait (Sunni) also decided to recognize the newly formed
National Coalition as the legitimate representative of the Syrian people.
If things are not complicated already it gets worse, the reasons that these
countries are so set on forcing Assad from power are varied and self-serving
and will lead to even more bloodshed and instability in the region if Assad
is removed forcibly. For the GCC the reasons are obvious, they are
supporting their Sunni brothers and ridding the region of Iran’s staunchest
ally.
Iran is a Shia country and is unique in the Muslim world due to the fact the
population of the Islamic Republic of Iran is approximately 90% Shia. The
Shia in Iran are not loved by their Arab Muslims neighbors for another
reason, Iranians are not Arabs but Persians and the Arab countries see a
powerful and assertive Iran as a threat.
For the West the reasons are different, the West is completely indifferent
to the Sunni Shia difference, their goals in the region are imperialistic
and as long as they can manipulate rifts in the Muslim world they will be
happy to do so. For the US there are two key goals in the region,
establishing control, to facilitate the exploitation of the resources, and
protecting Israel.
The duplicity is obvious and the concerns by the West are in no way
humanitarian. If the government supports the US military encroachment in the
region then they are a friend, if not, well they require regime change.
Look at Bahrain, a Sunni controlled country with oppressed Shia. For the
West Bahrain is strategically important as it hosts the United States Naval
Forces Central Command (COMUSNAVCENT) and the United States Fifth Fleet
(COMFIFTHFLT), so human rights issues are ignored and the Arab Spring
uprising by the Shia minority gets very little media attention.
Saddam Hussein is another example, he was Sunni and Iraq had an oppressed
Shia population, the problem for the US was not that Hussein was oppressing
the Shia, the problem was that he was forming an independent policy and not
cowing enough to the West’s demands. If he had allowed US bases on Iraqi
territory and allowed the US free reign of the country’s resources he would
still be with us today.
So in a nut-shell, although some might think the West is supporting the
Sunni Muslims, the fact is that the US is manipulating and using the Sunni
to advance their own goals and where convenient the Shia. Thi may not be
understood by many Muslims who see this as a betrayal from either side of
the aisle.
So as the Muslim world is experiencing upheavals along sectarian lines the
West is just manipulating the playing field to its advantage. Another
example of this was Muammar Gadaffi, who some say was a true Muslim because
he was neither Sunni no Shia. The US decided to remove Gaddafi for the same
resource reasons, because he was pursuing policies that were too independent
and because he reigned over the most just and fair socialist type system in
the world. Something that must not be allowed to stand by the West as it
does not allow for the exploitation of the country by capitalists interests.
Back to Syria, as Iran’s staunchest ally, regime change is required in Syria
because the West sees Syria as a threat in plans to invade and take out
Iran. It is also another troublesome independent country and an arch enemy
to Israel.
Most experts would agree that after Syria falls, then comes Iran. Some say
that in the West’s imperialistic plans of world domination after Iran comes
Venezuela then Russia and China.
So what we have, in a rather simplified summary, are Sunni nations,
advancing Sunni interests, the West manipulating sectarian divisions to
advance imperialistic and resource interests as well as to fulfill the
wishes of Israel and lastly, Iran and Syria being targeted by all sides.
Syria being taken apart from within due to the manipulation and stoking of
sectarian hatred and divisions and the introduction of foreign mercenaries
and terrorists into the country and Iran being isolated from without.
As for the UK seemingly unilaterally, or more exactly Prime Minister David
Cameron, saying the UK is ready for military intervention in Syria, well his
plans have run into a brick wall. According to the UK’s
Sun.
A military source said: “When one Brigadier heard the news Cameron wanted an
armed solution his response was, ‘you and whose Army?’” According to the Sun
Defense Secretary Philip Hammond and Foreign Secretary William Hague are
also against military intervention and they say Syria is nothing like Libya
because President Bashar al-Assad has formidable armed forces as well as
Russian backing.
The views and opinions expressed here are the writer’s own. He can be
reached at jar2@list.ru
12 November 2012, 19:13
Russia’s EMERCOM assisting the US after Sandy
Photo: RIA Novosti
A true unsung hero of the modern world is the Russian Federation’s Emergency
Situations Ministry or EMERCOM. 24 hours a day, 7 days a week they are ready
to respond to any emergency, anywhere on the planet. Selflessly and
tirelessly fulfilling their mission and asking nothing in return. The
thousands of professionals at EMERCOM save a life every 12 minutes,
something that is truly an admirable feat.
The Emergency Situations Ministry of the Russian Federation, or EMERCOM
(derived from "Emergency Control Ministry”) as it is known internationally,
has dispatched 2 huge Ilyushin-76 (IL-76) cargo aircraft loaded with
humanitarian aid to the United States for victims of Hurricane Sandy.
The aircraft lifted off from the Ramenskoye Airfield near Moscow which has
ideally long runways to help facilitate the taking offs and landings of the
huge aircraft. The two planes were loaded down with more than 50 tons of
emergency supplies on board for those hardest hit by the hurricane in the
United States.
This is not the first time that EMERCOM has assisted with the aftermath of
Hurricane Sandy. Immediately after the hurricane hit Cuba EMERCOM was there
delivering building materials and emergency supplies to the Cuban people at
the request of the government of the Republic of Cuba.
During that operation EMERCOM delivered over 32 tons of building materials
to assist in the rebuilding of the 1,000s of homes that Hurricane Sandy
destroyed.
The Ministry does not seek publicity or glory or play politics with its
assistance, as is evidenced by its
web site and
the short, even terse, news releases that it distributes regarding its
operations. It is in the business of assisting those in need and takes that
mission very seriously indeed.
According EMERCOM Minister Vladimir Puchkov, speaking at a forum in early
October, EMERCOM had carried out 40 humanitarian operations overseas since
the beginning of the year. That was before Sandy and several other disasters
worldwide.
Not only is the ministry assisting people in need internationally, according
to Vladimir Puchkov: EMERCOM rescue teams save a person’s life every 12
minutes, EMERCOM firefighters put out 300-400 fires a day, EMERCOM emergency
response teams and helicopter rescue teams respond to a seemingly endless
stream of road accidents and EMERCOM bomb disposal experts defuse from 100
to 200 explosive devices every 24 hours.
Almost every week EMERCOM evacuates Russian citizens in distress from around
the globe. Recently parachutist
Irina Sinitsyna who
was critically injured in California while attempting to break a world
parachuting record was airlifted by EMERCOM from California back to Moscow
on an aircraft equipped with an aerial emergency room staffed by five
doctors, the plane flew non-stop from California and safely delivered Irina
to Moscow but unfortunately despite the efforts of all involved she died
tragically on October 2nd at Burdenko Neurological Clinic.
Apart from California, Cuba, and New York EMERCOM has been to more locations
in the last year than most of us make it to in a lifetime. So far this year
this includes most of Europe, Thailand, the Caribbean, Cyprus, India, Sri
Lanka, all over the territory of the former Soviet Union, the Middle East
and more.
In 2011 70 international search and rescue operations were carried out by
the Ministry in such places as Austria, Italy, Serbia, Turkey, Tunisia,
Libya, Kyrgyzstan and Japan.
The current operation to assist the US is not the first for EMERCOM, after
the US was hit by Hurricane Katrina the Russian Emergency Situations
Ministry was there to assist in September 2005. Three
EMERCOM planes delivered more than 60 tons of humanitarian aid, including
medical supplies, rations, tents and blankets.
The birth date of the Ministry, for some is a point of argument; officially
the Ministry of Emergency Situations was founded on January 10, 1994 by an
order from then President Boris Yeltsin. However some consider the real date
of birth as being December 27, 1990, when the Russian Rescue Corps was
founded and assigned a similar mission.
Currently the Head of Ministry is Vladimir Puchkov, who was appointed by
President Vladimir Putin on May 17, 2012, and who replaced the first head of
the ministry, Sergey Shoigu, who was at the helm for 16 years.
Currently EMERCOM is working with countries worldwide, including the US, to
assist in responding more effectively to disasters anywhere they might
occur.
For EMERCOM rescuers and professionals their mission is a serious one and
their only reward is in a job well done. They do not seek publicity or
fanfare, and most of the staff will tell you, when they save a life, that is
enough.
So while some countries are engaged in wars, killing, regime changing and
using promises of assistance to further geopolitical goals, all over the
world Russia is quietly saving lives and assisting those in need, and asking
nothing in return.
The opinions and views expressed here are the writer’s own. He can be
reached at jar2@list.ru
Russia’s humanitarian aid arrives in New York
Russian humanitarian aid has arrived in New York, which has recently
suffered from the destructive super-storm Sandy. Almost 50 tons of blankets,
foodstuffs, medicaments and relief goods have been flown in by two
Emergencies Ministry aircraft.
The cargo is due to be distributed among residents of New York and New
Jersey who have suffered from the elements.
Sandy hit the US northeastern coast in late October, claiming more than 100
human lives and inflicting damage to the tune of over 50 billion dollars.
Earlier, the Russian Emergencies Ministry sent several planes with
foodstuffs, medicaments and tents to Cuba, which had also been battered by
Sandy.
Russia sends humanitarian aid to New York
Russia’s Emergency Ministry has sent a plane with humanitarian aid to New
York for the people who suffered from the Sandy storm.
Two Il-76 planes with 40 tons of cargo including blankets and articles of
daily necessities have taken off from the airport in Ramenskoye in the
Moscow region, the ministry's official said Tuesday.
Sandy-pummeled NYC to receive Russian aid
After delays caused by paperwork, two Russian flights will leave for New
York on Tuesday carrying 27 tons of blankets and other household items to
people who lost their homes to Hurricane Sandy.
Sandy is known to have claimed over 100 American lives, including more than
40 in the Big Apple.
UN to learn lessons from poor preparations for hurricane Sandy
The UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon has said that the United Nations will
learn lessons from what errors it made while preparing for hurricane Sandy,
which paralyzed the operation of the international organization’s
headquarters in New York.
According to him, the UN building basement was the worst damaged by floods,
which caused the cooling system to develop malfunction, with the subsequent
faulty operation of communications systems.
This proved of special concern to the delegations of the UN member-states,
since many of these failed to get timely information about the operation of
the UN headquarters.
According to Ban Ki-moon, this was due to the fact that the UN Secretariat
had old and no longer valid email addresses of permanent missions.
The United Nations was nonoperational for six days due to the hurricane that
hit New York last week.
US ambassador thanks Russia for Sandy relief aid
US Ambassador to Russia Michael McFaul has thanked Moscow for the relief aid
it sent to storm-hit New York.
“Thank you for help, Russia,” he tweeted on Monday.
Russia’s emergency agency has dispatched two IL-76 aircraft loaded with
humanitarian aid to New York, devastated by hurricane Sandy. The two Il-76
cargo-jets will each carry 27 tones of blankets and other essentials.
Voice of Russia, Interfax, TASS
11-13-2012 16:22 MST John Anderson from Calgary, Alberta, Canada wrote me
the following:
Dear John,
Nothing on the IL-76 EMERCOM firefighting unit? What a shame! There
was Field Exercise "Bogorodsk 2002", then there was the December, 2010
success with wildfire suppression at Mt Carmel, Israel, where IL-76s were
said to have 'spearheaded' the aerial attack; one aided by aircraft from
many nations.
There have been many other successes and the aircraft should be in use
globally, including in South Australia right now!
Cheers,
Thank you John!
11 November 2012, 13:47
Sergei Magnitsky’s death continues to be defiled by the West
In this media-bias piece we take a look at a typical right-wing attack on
Russia and Obama by someone who is supposed to be an “expert” on Russia.
Once again the pompous, sanctimonious, self-righteous, holier-than-thou,
hypocritical right-wing conservative view is filled with tired clichés,
factually challenged, completely biased and filled with half truths and
outright lies presented as fact.
This week’s biased-media report focuses on an article by right-wing
conservative Ilan Berman the Vice President of the conservative right-wing
American Foreign Policy Council in the right-wing conservative propaganda
rag the Washington Times. According to what I have dug up he is supposedly a
respected expert, or was, and the “think tank” the American
Foreign Policy Council provides
information to members of US Congress, the Executive Branch, and the US
policymaking community, as well as world leaders outside the US
(particularly in the former USSR). I suppose you could call them a mini-CIA
then, as it is usually a function of the CIA to provide intelligence to
officials.
Apparently the “expert” must not be making enough as the vice president of
the right-wing think tank and if judging by his article in the Washington
Times, the information he provides is of the same caliber, the reason is
obvious. Why someone in that position would resort to writing fact-starved,
vitriolic hate speech masked as anti-Russian propaganda pretending to be
another sanctimonious self-serving call for justice is beyond me.
The fact that he published
his vitriol in the Washington Times almost
says it all. This is a paper that gave
a column to Ted Nugent, an American “patriot”, who was scared and avoided
being drafted and sent to fight for America in Vietnam.
That’s right “Reverend”
Sun Myung Moon and the Unification Church which owns the Washington Times
gave him a column.
Back to the matter at hand, Ilam Berman’s anti-Russia piece, which was
published on November 6th, on the eve of the US elections. Perhaps he
thought Romney would win and wanted to become an advisor for the Romney
administration and was showing what he was made of? Just speculation, but
who knows?
Let’s start looking at Berman’s bias with his subject choice. The tragic
case of Sergei Magnitsky, a sensitive topic and another straw man argument
by the West so that it can continue to demonize Russia. The right-wing
sponsors of the Magnitsky bill need people to support it, they need people
to believe their mis-characterizations and shameful self-serving
mis-representations so that they can continue to demonize Russia for their
own self-interests, and they oh so need the Magnitsky Bill so they can look
righteous and throw up another threat against Russia and seize assets or
whatever other machinations they have up their sleeves.
Paragraph one of the Berman piece: We will start with the word
“languishing”. Sergey Magnitsky was in jail for 11 months in pre-trial
detention for rather serious charges. I will not say anything bad about
Magnitsky as he is no longer with us, bless his soul, and can not defend
himself, but I will say any lawyer, and this includes US based attorneys use
their knowledge to benefit their clients and sometimes that includes using
the system to their own advantage, meaning bending the law.
If we want to talk about jail terms, as the word languishing implies,
perhaps we can bring up millions of US cases, right now the NATO 5 comes to
mind, already in jail for almost 9 months with perhaps more than a year to
go before their trial begins. Guantanamo anyone?
Mr. Magnitsky’s death was tragic, he was improperly diagnosed and was not
treated on time, but to characterize the case as being denied medical
attention is incorrect. However Berman can attack people who can not defend
themselves as they are Russians, do not read rags like the Washington Times
and many have lost their jobs who were anywhere near the case, but I can
defend them and I will.
Bill Browder the co-founder of Hermitage Capital Management was most likely
guilty of tax-evasion and bribing officials, there is no other likely
explanation as to how Mr. Magnitsky “uncovered” corruption and tax fraud,
and as Browder’s lawyer it would have been up to him to be in the middle of
it, he was doing his job and made the fall guy by Bowder.
Back to Berman’s twisted article. Berman states the case and the
circumstances surrounding Magnitsky’s death are “fraught with absurdity”, I
wonder if all of the police officers and people involved who have lost their
jobs and prosecuted would say the same thing. My Berman’s article however,
is in fact filled with absurdities, as in the next sentence he brings out
that tired and worn cliché “Soviet”, he says “in time-honored Soviet
tradition” the lawyers have not seen the case files. Maybe someone should
tell Berman the Soviet Union has not existed for over 2 decades. Maybe not
as a trip to the Soviet Union is his “think tanks” only claim to fame. We
wouldn’t want to burst his bubble now would we?
Berman continues his rant and with uncharacteristic restraint for a
right-wing hack, waited until paragraph 4 to attack Obama. Saying Obama has
tried to ignore the Magnitsky case to appease Russia. He then characterizes
Russia’s permission to allow for limited use of Russian airspace to allow
the US to supply troops in Afghanistan as acquiescence, after the US pleaded
with Russia for Russian assistance.
Berman next unbelievably attempts to transpose right-wing “Russia is
geopolitical enemy #1” rhetoric onto the Russian people. He cites Russia’s
independent position on Iran and Russia’s calls for an internal resolution
in Syria to its own sovereign problem as “strongly suggesting that Moscow
still sees Washington as the “main enemy”. Wrong again Berman, your right
wingers openly and stupidly state this repeatedly, no Russian official has
ever stated such nonsense. Another strike for you. In the same paragraph he
says “the government of Russian President Vladimir Putin is capricious,
unaccountable and deeply anti-democratic”.
Hold on a minute! Capricious, unaccountable and deeply anti-democratic?
Again Berman must be suffering from overload spinning America’s failure as
virtuous. Capricious, shall we mention US arbitrary laws and the stripping
away of civil liberties? Unaccountable? Shall we mention George Bush, Dick
Cheney, Condeleezza Rice and everyone who was instrumental in committing and
continuing all of the war crimes and crimes against humanity the US has been
guilty of in the last decade, not to mention torture, extra-judicial
executions, indefinite detention and droning. Anti-Democratic? Ask the
thousands of Occupiers, third party followers and leaders, and any non-white
non-Christian in the US about that.
Should I continue? Berman then cites “a punk band” I guess he couldn’t
remember what they were called and Sergey Udaltsov as examples of Russian
authoritarian rule. First if you want to know what I think of P-Riot follow
this link (P-Riot:
provocation against church and state) as
for Udaltsov, he may be tried for treason, he is guilty of organizing
illegal rallies and attempting to subvert the government in my opinion, and
is a traitor in the pay of the west as I see it.
These are two examples of how almost anything is allowed to take place in
Russia, not authoritarianism Berman. If similar deeds were committed in
America would you be so defensive Berman? Of course you wouldn’t. They would
probably get the death penalty. Should I mention Manning? Assange? Jeremy
Hammond?
Berman did say one thing almost truthful in his pre-penultimate paragraph
about the Obama Administration’s position on the Magnitsky Act, “They also
fear that Moscow might make good on threats of retaliatory measures if the
act is actually signed into law.” That would mean Moscow could go and ban
everyone involved in any illegal prosecution in the US, anyone associated
with an “accidental” execution of an innocent man (happens all the time in
the US), anyone involved in prosecuting whistleblower Bradley Manning, in
persecuting WikiLeaks, in illegally kidnapping and prosecuting Victor Bout
and Konstantin Yaroshenko, in carrying out and ordering extra-judicial
executions, torture, violations of the Geneva Conventions, aggressive wars,
the list goes on and on.
If the Government of the Russian Federation decided to try to make America
bend to its will or give it a black eye by making such a list as the
Magnitsky List or passing a law like the Magnitsky Act, the names on it
would be in the millions.
Berman closes with “The road to a true “reset,” therefore, cannot lie in
keeping silent about the Kremlin’s criminalized domestic conduct.” I would
say the same thing for Washington.
As for Sergey Magnitsky, his death was tragic, the way he was manipulated
and made the fall guy by his Western employer was despicable, and everyone
directly involved in his death has already been punished. In case you did
not know that Berman.
The views and opinions expressed here are my own, but I think several
million people would agree with me. I can be reached at jar2@list.ru.
10 November 2012, 19:30
We must exalt the true, the good and the beautiful – Hu Jintao
Photo: EPA
In an event that takes place every ten years the People’s Republic of China
has gathered to choose new leaders. Amid extremely tight security and little
information being readily available China watchers are struggling to fathom
what the future direction of the country will be. This will be made clear
when the congress is completed but statements by outgoing leader Hu Jintao
give us a very good indication.
The People’s Republic of China has begun the process of reforming their
power structure and selecting new members to leadership positions during the
current 18th Congress of the Communist Party of the People’s Republic of
China.
The process of changing the leadership of the country takes place once every
ten years and involves a gathering of China’s Communist Party delegates from
all over the Republic.
While the West is full of talks of reforms and changes in their never ending
desire to see the Communist country collapse, Chinese leader Hu Jintao has
made it clear that China is not going to change. The path of Socialism with
a Chinese Character will be continued and made stronger and continue to be
built upon.
This week the leadership will be announced after they are formally appointed
by the Central Committee to their respective positions, the Central
Committee is chosen in turn by the approximately 2,987 delegates of the
Party Congress.
The makeup of the Communist Government includes the head, the Secretary
General of the Party, or the “President” as he is commonly referred to in
the West, followed by 9 members of the Politburo Standing Committee, then 24
members of the Politburo itself who answer to the Central Committee which is
made up of 204 members and has 167 alternate lower ranking members, they in
turn answer to the Party Congress made up of approximately 2,400 delegates.
Secretary General Hu Jintao began the congress by addressing the delegates
in a speech that has seen no end of analysis by the West. Among his main
points was a call to continue to fight corruption at all levels. He was
unusually strong in his language for calling for all to be treated equally
when it came to answering for corruption related offenses and crimes against
the people, “No one is allowed to place oneself above the party
organization. We must ensure that all are equal before discipline.”
Reflected the unrest amongst the Chinese people and the seriousness of the
problem Hu made it clear that if something is not done it could lead to the
end of the Socialist China as a whole and the 91 year old party: “If we fail
to handle this issue well, it could prove fatal to the party and even cause
the collapse of the party and the fall of the state, we must strengthen
education about combating corruption and promote clean government and
improve the culture of clean government. A tough position on cracking down
on corruption must be maintained at all times, and thorough investigations
into major corruption cases must take place and we must work hard to resolve
problems of corruption that directly affect the people.” Hu said in his
statement.
The West of course is in a quandary as little information is being made
available by the party as to the direction they are going to take and calls
to end corruption only add to the West’s worries as they affect Western
attempts at economic manipulation and the subversion of the Communist system
of the People’s Republic.
As China is the most populated country on Earth and the US is extremely
dependent on China economically, new policies by China could make or break
the US economy, especially at a time when it is weak and depends on
affordable Chinese exports and huge Chinese investment to keep it afloat,
anti-Communist rhetoric is kept to a minimum as are any moves to upset the
superpower.
Chinese sentiment toward the US is at a low reflected by a US Embassy
“election party” at a ballroom in a Beijing hotel that fell flat on its face
as most of the invited officials did not attend. Chinese security services
questioned an American diplomat as the party was conducted without the
permission of the authorities. The American diplomat arrogantly answered
that they did not need permission.
Another worry for the West has been statements pointing to the intention of
China to become more assertive in protecting its territorial integrity and
maritime interests. During his speech Secretary General Hu Jintao stated
that China is committed to: "enhancing our capacity for exploiting marine
resources … to resolutely safeguard China's maritime rights and interests
and build China into a maritime power.”
During the Congress statements have been made regarding increasing China’s
economic role in the world and strengthening its economic might. Something
China watchers say may be of greatest concern to the West, currently
seriously weakened by an economic crisis and the US in particular which is
also bogged down in military adventures all over the planet.
Unfortunately security is so tight around the congress and it is so
difficult for reporters to get in that there is little detailed information
available as to concrete decisions that are being made, however once the
Congress is complete more information will become available.
Outgoing Secretary General Hu Jintao made an impassioned plea during his
speech regarding correcting problems of concern to society saying, “We must
exalt the true, the good and the beautiful and reject the false, the evil
and the ugly". A very beautiful and eloquent thought, in my opinion, from
the leader of a superpower, it is unfortunate other world leaders do not
share that sentiment.
The opinions and views expressed here are the writer’s own. He can be
reached at jar2@list.ru.
9 November 2012, 19:19
Republicans make themselves look like morons - CodePink founder
During the elections Medea Benjamin the co-founder and the director of the
peace and women's rights group Code Pink granted the Voice of Russia an
exclusive interview and spoke about the illegality of US drone warfare, a
media blackout on 3rd party candidates, Jill Stein and Cheri Honkala's
detention during presidential debates, Republicans and their positions on
women's rights and the other subjects such as the secular society that is
supposed to exist in the US. This is part 2 of an interview with Medea Benjamin. Follow this link for part 1: Medea Benjamin Part One
Robles: What
issues has CODEPINK been troubled with during these elections?
Benjamin: There’re
two different issues. One is that CODEPINK has been very concerned that so
many important issues didn’t come
up in the elections, like climate change, like wars, like the policies that
the US has of using drone warfare. That’s something that CODEPINK will
continue to work on.
We’ve been one of the leaders in this country in trying to sound the alarm
that the U.S. use of unmanned aircraft in places from Pakistan to Yemen,
Somalia, Afghanistan, killing anybody that the U.S. Government wants,
whenever it wants on the basis of secret information, is extremely
dangerous, and sets a terrible precedent for the rest of the world. So
that’s something that we will be working on.
There’s also the issue of the U.S. budget and there’ll be a big fight in
Congress and the Administration about how to divide up the pie in the coming
months. And, unfortunately, because of the corporate interests around the
Pentagon, there’ll be many attempts by both the President and the Democrats
and the Republicans parties in Congress to quote: “Protect the Pentagon from
budget cuts” but meanwhile be taking large chunks of money out of needed
social services, and cutting things like Medicare and Social Security that
are key to the interests of the majority of middle class people in this
country.
So we’ll be focusing on trying to bring to attention to the need to cut the
Pentagon budget and how many billions of dollars could be saved by doing
things like closing the over 800 US bases that we have overseas, ending the
war in Afghanistan as soon as possible and stop the production of weapons
that came out of the Cold War with the Soviet Union and are still being
produced just because they create jobs, not because Pentagon either weants
or needs them.
Robles: I
see. What’s your opinion of the arrest of Cheri Honkala and Jill Stein and
them being held in a warehouse for 8 hours chained to chairs so they were
not near the debates?
Benjamin: It
is just shameful that two very articulate women that are running for
president and vice-president on the Green Party ticket were not only kept
from speaking in the debates but were kept from even being in the hall where
the debates were taking place, that they were arrested, that they were
shackled, that they were treated like dangerous criminals is a terrible
shame and blight on this country’s democratic system.
Robles: Is
anything going to come out of that, I mean legally? Is there any recourse
that they have?
Benjamin: No,
there is no recourse they have. I think part of what they wanted to do was
call attention to the black-out of third party candidates and in that sense
they were successful in some degree, I mean not large enough because as you
said there are still, probably the vast majority of people in this country,
who don’t know who they are, who don’t know they are running and don’t know
that they were even arrested. But that is part of the media blackout that
tries to marginalize people who are not part of the two-party-system.
Robles: Do
you see any differences between Barack Obama and Mitt Romney, in particular
in their foreign policy which would be more interesting for our
international listeners and in the internal US policies that they espouse?
Benjamin: I
think there is a great difference when it comes to social issues inside the
United States that the Administration of Barack Obama and the Democratic
Party are much more sensitive to: the issues of women, much more sensitive
to gay rights, also to issues relating to the immigrant community. And those
are all very important issues. But when it comes to foreign policy we
haven’t seen much of a difference. I think the Democratic Party would be
less likely to get us into a war with Iran but they have also been very much
champions of strict economic sanctions that are hurting the ordinary Iranian
people. And if pushed by the Israelis, they would probably feel obliged to
support Israel in any kind of intervention with Iran. So in things like
drone attacks I’m sure the Republicans would continue such a policy if not
increase it. So, I think in general we are better off with a President
Barack Obama than we would be with Mitt Romney.
Reminder
Robles: I
talked to presidential candidate Peta Lindsay. She said the Republican Party
is fighting for white supremacy. How far it from the truth…or would you
agree with that statement?
Benjamin: Well,
I wouldn’t agree with the statement in the way that it is said but I would
agree with the statement that the Republican Party represents the interests
of white conservative people and is a stronger proponent of the interests of
the “Corporate State”. That said, there are certainly a lot of people who
are racist in this country and they would tend to be closer to the
Republican Party than they would be to the Democratic Party. But then we
have to recognize that there are also just a lot of ordinary Americans who
vote Democratic.
In fact 40% of people in unions, just ordinary working class people in this
country vote Republican. The majority of union households vote Democratic
but 40% of them vote Republican. So, I’m saying that while Republicans tend
to represent the interests of wealthier white people, there are a lot of
ordinary working class people who vote Republican.
Robles: Why
is that?
Benjamin: Well,
I think because sometimes the Republicans are better than the Democrats at
articulating issues around the economy. Many people think that the Democrats
are for big government and that means higher taxes and people are very
concerned that they are already being taxed so much and they want lower
taxes and fiscal responsibility and they think that the Republicans stand
for that.
Robles: Ok,
I see. Regarding women’s rights and women’s issues what could you say about
the Republican Party versus the Democratic Party?
Benjamin: The
Republicans have just been horrific in this campaign season, saying terrible
things about women, including talking about legitimate rape and women being
able to shut down their bodies from getting pregnant if they were raped. And
this has given a big black eye to the Republican Party and makes them look
like morons.
The Democrats have certainly been much more supportive of women’s issues,
from supporting equal pay for women which is something that even Mitt Romney
has not been willing to support, which is so insane, to being more sensitive
to women’s needs around reproductive rights.
So, definitely I think the Republicans have alienated a lot of women because
of very stupid positions that they have taken as a party, but particularly
what some of the individual Republican candidates have said and done during
this election season.
Robles: This
may not be a standard question: Republicans, Neo-Conservatives, for some
reason, now this is my opinion, they seem to want to … They have a need to
control women’s bodies. For example what you were saying about forcing a
woman to carry a child after she’s been raped. Why is that?
Benjamin: Well,
there are some Republicans who equate their religious beliefs with the
sanctity of life and they say that life begins at conception. And so they
think that because of their beliefs they have the right to tell women that
they must carry through on any kind of pregnancy. And they also refuse to
support a health care system that gives women the right to have reproductive
needs met. So, I think it comes from their religious beliefs but it also
comes from mere desire to have control over women.
Robles: Even
in the Orthodox… the Russian Orthodox faith if something, for example rape
happens, they look at each case, as far as an abortion goes. And it is
really still the woman’s choice.
I think that sounds insane, I wonder have you ever heard of any Republican
politician whose wife (I know it’s a horrible thing to think about) or
sister, or somebody who was raped and forced the person to have the child, I
don’t think that would happen.
Benjamin: They
have been asked these kinds of questions sometimes during the campaign and
some of them have said – oh, it is a terrible thing, but as one person said
- it is God’s will. He then had to turn around and back down on that but it
shows these are his beliefs and that was something that blurted out from his
mouth. So, whether they would do it in reality if it was some member of
their family – that’s another question. But certainly they have shown that
they have no consideration for women having control over their own bodies.
Robles: I
see. Isn’t that a problem of separation between the church and state? Nobody
thinks about that anymore in the US or?
Benjamin: You
know, it is odd that this is supposed to be a secular government but there
are so many ways that issues around religion get snuck in. And that is one
of them where people who legislate and they tend to almost always be men,
will try to legislate their religious beliefs around things like women’s
reproductive issues. So, unfortunately I think there are way too many ways
in which religion is not separated from the state.
Robles: Medea,
thanks a lot I’ve taken up a lot of your time. Is there anything else you’d
like to finish up with, it is all yours.
Benjamin: No,
thank you so much for calling and asking such great questions. I’m going to
go off and vote right now.
Robles: Who
are going to vote for?
Benjamin: I’m
going to vote for Jill Stein, very proudly.
Robles:Oh
WOW! Somebody actually told us. Thanks a lot.
9 November 2012, 19:03
Nothing was accomplished by Obama - Rick Rozoff
Voice of Russia regular contributor Rick Rozoff, the owner of Stop NATO
International spoke with us on election night regarding the US elections.
Rick was candid in his remarks about the US political machine and the voting
process in the country. Sadly for Americans the next four years do not look
good for the average American according to Mr. Rozoff.
He
spoke about the impossibilities faced by some candidates, irregularities
during voting, difficulties faced by voters, the Electoral College, the
unfairness of the politcal system, and the fact that only a limited amount
of voters decide the election. He also predicts that things are going to get
worse in the US.
9 November 2012, 02:58
Illinois to cut children's immunizations to save money - Occupy Chicago
spokesperson
Natalie Wahlberg, a spokesperson for Occupy Chicago, spoke to the Voice of
Russia on the heels of the US presidential elelction and filled us in on the
latest developments with the NATO 5 and the Occupy Movement. She stated that
the Occupy Movement is going to begin buying up the debts of the poor and
forgiving them. Occupy Wall Street has also been instrumental in assisting
after Hurrican Sandy when FEMA was nowhere to be seen.
This is John Robles. I am speaking with Natalie
Wahlberg, who is an Activist with Occupy Chicago.
Robles: It
looks like Obama is going to be in the White House for 4 more years. What do
you think the next 4 years will be like with Obama?
Wahlberg: Certainly
Obama does not have any sort of election constraints on him so he is free to
do whatever he sees fit, that includes more drone attacks on Pakistan and
Yemen, also Obama has green-lighted the Keystone Pipeline which is a
pipeline from the Tarzans down through Texas and there is are a bunch of
very dedicated men and women fighting against that right now.
Robles: What’s
it looking like in Chicago? Do you think there will be any contested races
in the country?
Wahlberg: Honestly,
I don’t think so. It looks like a pretty clear cut case that Obama is the
winner. Romney is honestly a terrible candidate and really picking between
Barack Obama and Mitt Romney was a choice between the so-called lesser of
the two evils.
Robles: Did
third party candidates fare well at all in Illinois or in your area?
Wahlberg: I
have not seen any reports on mainstream media about Jill Stein or other
third party candidates. I know Jill Stein was arrested while attempting to
enter the presidential debates highlighting how people of color and people
who are not a part of mainstream society are targeted by police, including
activists.
Robles: Is
there such a media blackout in the US that it is possible that something
like that could happen and somebody could not even hear about it?
Wahlberg: Absolutely.
Like I know with Occupy movement we have been oppressed by a media blackout
and we just find it is honestly not surprising, Jill Stein has does a really
good work for the Keystone XL blockade, she brought food and supplies for
them and was arrested.
Robles: Again,
right? Do you know any details about that we might not be aware of?
Wahlberg: Jill
Stein was delivering supplies to the people who are sitting in trees and
physically chaining themselves to machinery to prevent this pipeline from
going through and so she brought them food and water and was arrested. The
charges as yet are unclear.
Robles: I
mean, so what’s the crime in giving these people some food and water?
Wahlberg: That
is a very good question.
Robles: Where
do they get off? I can’t believe it anymore, really.
Wahlberg: It
is a surprise for myself. This is the life that activists sort of face.
Similar to how Jill Stein was arrested for the innocent act of providing
food and supplies, we are fighting our own fight in Chicago with the NATO 5,
these 5 men who were entrapped by Chicago police for having an innocent
conversation. Just recently one of the men Sebastian Senakiewicz has agreed
to go to boot camp for 4 months, it is a boot camp for non-violent
offenders, and he will have his charges dropped.
Robles: He
goes to boot camp for 4 months. I mean, these guys are charged with… They
are supposed to be super-terrorists or something.
Wahlberg: Exactly.
He is going to boot camp, this is a really good waste of taxpayer resources
to be charging these men with terrorism and tying up judicial resources and
charging them and then having this trial only for it to be dropped.
Robles: Do
you think the other guys will get the same opportunity?
Wahlberg: One
can only hope they have a very similar case of entrapment.
Robles: Unbelievable.
4 months at boot camp and he is out of a death sentence or life in prison
for terrorism.
Wahlberg: Yes,
4 to 15 years, it is another case of state repression.
Robles: Where
do you see the US in about 6 months with Obama pretty much unrestrained? Do
you think there might be a weird possibility that he could actually start
making the big changes that people thought he would now that he doesn’t have
anything to lose or do you think he will go the opposite direction?
Wahlberg: I
think Obama says a lot of things he needs to say to get elected and it
doesn’t necessarily mean anything now that he has been re-elected. I believe
the same things will continue on, people’s homes will still be foreclosed
upon which is why Occupy is taking really amazing steps to fight against
anti-eviction and home foreclosure by working on the Occupy Our Homes
campaign.
And also with the amount of debt per person, Occupy Wall Street has taken
this initiative called Strike Debt which is where individuals will
contribute to a larger pool fund and then Occupy Wall Street will buy up
people’s debt for pennies on the dollar much like debt collectors do that
are collecting the debt, but they will forgive it. So, we are looking at
radical debt reformation.
Robles: That
sounds great.
Wahlberg: Yes,
it is actually also called Rolling Jubilee and more information can be found
at RollingJubilee.org, and that debuts November 15th.
Robles: That
sounds very productive and positive.
Wahlberg: It
is amazing. Other actions that are going on. I don’t know if you heard about
this in Russia but it is something called the Fiscal Cliff. Have you heard
of that?
Robles: Nyet,
Nyet, I haven’t heard of that yet. What is that?
Wahlberg: Fiscal
cliff is a sort of phrase that has been invented by politicians as sort of
an urgent measure to balance the budget and that affects every state, every
person. In Illinois they are proposing balancing the budget on the backs of
the working class, more specifically this is something really dear to my
heart. The Illinois Senators are suggesting cutting the childhood
immunization, the medical shots that a kid needs to go to school, they are
going to be cutting that program, that means children whose parents don’t
have insurance, won’t be able to receive the free shots.
Robles: You’ve
got to be kidding me. This is supposed to be to save money?
Wahlberg: Yes,
they will save 7.1 million dollars by stopping 8,156 children, just like my
daughter. I have been the recipient of a program like this.
Robles :
Like I was when I was a kid, I think like 99% of us were. But they have 56
million dollars to host a NATO Summit. The Republicans and Democrats have
2.5 billion dollars for TV ads to say nothing about the real problems in
America. Unbelievable.
Wahlberg: And
how much do our drones cost that we are using to kill brown people in
Pakistan and Yemen, and I know that money could be better spent balancing
the budget instead of balancing the budget on the backs of the working
class. If anything the elections have shown that community groups like
Occupy Wall Street, Occupy Chicago are really the only network and resource
that individuals can count on. We have seen this with Hurricane Sandy where
Occupy Sandy volunteers went into neighborhoods where FEMA had never shown
up, gave them some hot food, gave them blankets and resources. We will keep
fighting and I will keep talking to you.
|